Gender diversity on boards pays dividends—but inequality persists
Evidence shows that diversity on boards boosts financial performance. So why are some firms still failing to reach gender targets?
Image: MJgraphics/Shutterstock
Some of the UK’s biggest companies stand accused of failing to reach gender board diversity targets in circumstances that could seriously damage both organisational reputations, and the opportunities offered by embracing different styles of leadership.
In 2016 the Hampton-Alexander Review, an independent, business-led framework supported by government recommendations, produced guidance on how FTSE 350 companies needed to improve the representation of women on their boards and in leadership positions.
The review set a minimum 33% target for women on FTSE 350 boards, alongside the two layers of leadership below the board—the executive
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
Shell climate plan ruling holds lessons for investors
Judge in court action brought by Dutch activists described Shell climate plan as “rather intangible, undefined and non-binding”.
-
The guardianship circle: praxis of governance and audit committees
Why is the practice of corporate governance so different from best practice standards? Effective corporate governance "in practice" is fluid, context-specific and depends on practitioners’ skills, initiative and adaptation.
-
ESG ‘not a factor’ in share price resilience during Covid-19 crisis
Researchers found that firms' ESG ratings were also “significantly negatively associated with returns” in the Q2 recovery period.
