Gender diversity on boards pays dividends—but inequality persists
Evidence shows that diversity on boards boosts financial performance. So why are some firms still failing to reach gender targets?
Image: MJgraphics/Shutterstock
Some of the UK’s biggest companies stand accused of failing to reach gender board diversity targets in circumstances that could seriously damage both organisational reputations, and the opportunities offered by embracing different styles of leadership.
In 2016 the Hampton-Alexander Review, an independent, business-led framework supported by government recommendations, produced guidance on how FTSE 350 companies needed to improve the representation of women on their boards and in leadership positions.
The review set a minimum 33% target for women on FTSE 350 boards, alongside the two layers of leadership below the board—the executive
Like this article? Sign up to our newsletter to get more articles like this delivered straight to your inbox. For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance & an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards & directors navigate the complexities of their roles. Subscribe to Board Agenda Subscribe Here
Related Stories
-
How will Covid-19 impact diversity in UK business?
Despite evidence that diversity leads to better business outcomes, the Covid-19 pandemic threatens progress in this area—and thereby risks the recovery.
-
EU set to review its Non-Financial Reporting Directive
The sustainability reporting rules have faced criticism for failing to produce the detailed disclosures required to confront climate change.
-
US boards increase engagement with investors’ ESG concerns
The number of withdrawn proxy proposals relating to the environment has risen significantly, suggesting boards are taking investor views more seriously.
