Skip to content

6 October, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • esg pay

      ESG-linked executive pay has failed

      It’s time to reform target-based pay systems—only meaningful targets can make a positive planetary difference.

      notebook on boardroom table

      How to gauge board effectiveness

      Board effectiveness evaluations are evolving in line with rising expectations on directors to learn, adapt...

      ask

      How to get better oversight of safeguarding

      Reporting is not assurance: a board can hugely improve its governance of safeguarding simply by...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • esg pay

      ESG-linked executive pay has failed

      It’s time to reform target-based pay systems—only meaningful targets can make a positive planetary difference.

      shareholder primacy

      What is a company for?

      We all have an ethical imperative to question whether shareholder primacy should still be dominating...

      data

      Every board needs a scientist or engineer

      STEM professionals are trained to work with incomplete data, and in business you rarely have...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • governance

      How better governance helps private companies grow

      If governance is to become mature, management decision-making has no place on the board’s agenda,...

      future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • executive pay levels

      Non-executive pay rises fastest in Europe

      Rises in financial services boards’ remuneration in the UK and Europe are beating North America...

      board skills clash

      When board skills clash

      Board composition in terms of expertise has a clear impact on entrepreneurial decision-making and strategy,...

      female ceos

      FTSE 100 CEO appointments rise

      The number of CEO appointments has doubled in six months, although the global picture suggests...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • Spencer Stuart US Board Index 2026

      The 2026 US Spencer Stuart Board Index is a review of board composition and governance...

      DIligent AI odyssey 2026 cover

      The AI odyssey: An inflection point for governance, risk and compliance (GRC)

      Diligent and Board Agenda’s whitepaper for boards shows where AI governance gaps emerge and what...

      ACCA

      ACCA 2026 Enabling finance insight: Bridging skills and data gaps for AI-enabled finance.

      This ACCA global survey of 1,600 finance professionals reveals that the function is increasingly embracing...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Alison Taylor: ‘Business can do the right thing’

by Gavin Hinks on January 24, 2024

Taylor is optimistic that better leadership can enable purpose and sustainability to go beyond tackling reputational and regulatory risk.

Favorite

Alison Taylor believes we need to have a “serious conversation about what the role of business is in society”. The Stern School of Business professor (pictured) has started that discussion with a new book—Higher Ground: How Business Can Do the Right Thing in a Turbulent World.

Taylor makes some key observations, one of which is that companies are struggling to be all things to all stakeholders. If they’re going to be better, and do the right thing, she suggests they will need a “purpose” but need to stop confusing “narratives” with substance, and start being honest about what they can and can’t achieve.

The book’s introduction claims: “You will come to regard ‘purpose’ in a fresh light. Purpose can prove useful in a practical sense, but only if it goes beyond a common win-win framing. It can—and must be—deployed as much more than a marketing gimmick.”

‘Purpose must be deployed as much more than a marketing gimmick.’

Taylor’s advice also rests on a unique diagnosis about corporate sustainability claims. What is traditionally known as “business ethics” has become a set of “defensive corporate principles” to defend shareholder value from reputational and regulatory risk. As a result, “sustainability” effectively becomes a narrative, a story, told to illuminate all the good things a company does, so that regulators and shareholders leave them alone.

“We’re telling corporations that if you have sustainability initiatives, and you keep your stakeholders happy, you’ll have a better reputation. And it’s not true. You can be a sustainability poster child… and you actually get more activist attacks, not less.”

Wake up and smell the coffee

The evidence is on the opening pages as Taylor cites the predicament of Starbucks. The company scores well on many sustainability measures, but the coffee chain undermines its position by opposing unionisation among its workers.

The company is falling short on being “consistent”, a factor corporates need “to wake up to”, she writes.

It’s a hard juggling act. Solving the conundrum, according to Taylor, involves movement on multiple fronts. Separating brand and reputation management specialists from sustainability leads to avoid competing public messages or even accusations of hypocrisy; purpose statements should be meaningful; companies need to be brutally honest about their “impact” on the outside world (many, Taylor observes, talk about sustainability, while ignoring the effects of their core products).

‘You see a lot more speaking up [from employees] and leaking on social media.’

In addition, leadership style, especially top-down leadership, will likely have to change. Companies will also need to be honest in discussing what they believe they can tackle and the issues best left to politicians and democratic process.

Leadership is a key issue for Taylor. A younger generation in the workplace wants to be listened to and involved: “barking” orders from the top has had its day.

“One thing I’m arguing is that doesn’t work anymore, partly because young people want to be led in different ways,” says Taylor.

“You see a lot more collective action. You see a lot more speaking up [from employees] and leaking on social media. You don’t necessarily see that respect for authority.”

The best policy

Honesty is necessary, according to Taylor, to avoid making superficial sustainability claims. “Saying we’re going to listen to stakeholders in a generic way doesn’t really make sense,” she says. “We need to understand that no company is getting everything right. We need to identify the good practices, not the good and bad companies.

“And we need to understand no one is perfect, and we have a lot to learn from a lot of companies that may be perceived as problematic.”

‘I have a lot of hope from the younger generation: they’re kind of amazing.

Taylor remains optimistic that companies will become better, largely because of the changing nature of up-and-coming leaders.

“I have a lot of hope from the younger generation: they’re kind of amazing. I think they will lead differently. Millennials are not in their 40s, so I think we’re starting to see leadership shifts.” And that’s a call back to changing leadership models.

“Now it’s much more about a facility with concepts of diversity and social impact, understanding sustainability. It’s much less about, ‘I’m a former CFO and I can bark orders from the top!’

“A lot of people tell me I’m crazy, that Gen Z will toe the line when they need to pay their mortgages.

“I’m not so sure. I think the world is changing. On climate change alone, we will see different leadership… I don’t think any of this is going to happen quickly or easily. I’m super concerned about all the 2024 elections, particularly in the US. There are many, many ways this can pan out very poorly; we certainly see some companies doubling down on practices that I say are wrong.

“But I have a lot of hope for a leadership shift over the long term and reconciling all of these ideas.”

As politics surrounding sustainability becomes increasingly polarised a new voice on business ethics is urgently needed. Taylor may just be that voice.

Higher Ground by Alison Taylor is out on 13 February.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • Investment managers hesitant to embrace ethics as part of ESG
    March 21, 2022
    Business ethics on cogs

    Study finds investors shy away from direct talk of ethics, but some are assessing company culture as an indicator of ESG performance.

  • Greenwashing threatens shareholders’ interests
    July 4, 2022
    greenwash

    ‘Companies that believe their own greenwash are embedding liability and storing up risk’, warns chair of UK Environment Agency.

  • Corporate efforts to define their 'purpose' fail to convince employees
    September 23, 2022
    patagonia corporate process

    Survey finds most staff believe their company has changed little or not at all since setting out a purpose.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

DIligent AI odyssey 2026 cover

The AI odyssey: An inflection point for governance, risk and compliance (GRC)

AI is already shaping board papers, risk decisions and compliance workflows. The...

The Future of FTSE 350 Chairs: Pathways, Pipelines & Barriers 2026

This report is a collaboration between the FTSE Women Leaders Review and Professor...

Agentic AI from principles to practice 

‘A C-suite guide to capturing value without losing control’, this Forvis Mazars...

Route to the Top: Europe 2026 

This survey report from Heidrick & Struggles finds that companies are tending...
board's role in a rewired world fgs 2026 cover

A hard job getting harder: The board's role in a rewired world

The role of a corporate director is demanding intellectually, ethically and strategically—and...

Boardroom resilience: Practical governance for risk, readiness and rapid response

Boards are operating in a world defined by uncertainty. Geopolitical tensions, climate...

Board Value Index Summer 2026

Board Intelligence found 86% of directors say rigid processes and inconsistent frameworks...

Governance Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Governance Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy