Skip to content

31 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Listen up—and get a feel for future risk

by Nada Kakabadse and Andrew Kakabadse

In a world rife with conflict, boards can develop valuable strategic opportunities from the geopolitical knowledge of their general managers.

future risk

Image: Ake13bk/Shutterstock.com

Human history is littered with the legacy of unresolved conflicts and bitter exchanges, many of which even escalate into full-blown war that destroys lives and property, and dismantles national and international services and trade. At their most extreme, such irresolvable positions devastate entire nations.

When it comes to top teams and organisational leadership, similar principles of unhealthy engagement apply.

An accusation often thrown at the firm’s senior executives during a conflict is ‘you mean you didn’t know this was going to happen?’ More often than not, the harsh truth is ‘yes,’ top management did foresee these outcomes all along, but they avoided taking action to halt them.

It is not unusual for boards to fall out of touch with the geopolitics of the operation they are meant to be stewarding, but it always surprising that they are so often disconnected from their own general managers.

The significance of general managers

The general managers are country or divisional heads, subsidiary managing directors, and senior middle-level managers who directly interact with the market and communities. As such they are held accountable for sales and localised performance. These managers are, in effect, the backbone of the organisation and represent the reality of the market.

In addition to meeting targets, general managers operate and reorganise local supply chains, which provide the materials and services to allow the firm to conduct its business.

General managers are the backbone of the organisation and represent the reality of the market

High-performing general managers form deep relationships with significant local stakeholders, including regulators, customs officials, ministers of state, and even entire governments. In this manner, the firm is seen in the most positive light and sales channels work efficiently.

In February 2022, the beginning of the war between Russia and Ukraine was presented as a surprise. However, the harsh reality is that it was no surprise at all.

In fact, Chinese president, Xi Jinping, asked President Vladimir Putin ‘to delay the invasion of Ukraine until after the Winter Olympics’ and Putin respectfully obliged. It is difficult to accept that western firms in Russia and the Ukraine did not have an idea of what was soon to come. It’s equally likely is that the board was informed but did not want to know.

The predictive power of ‘fracture points’

The Kakabadse Global Studies research has clearly identified a fundamental leadership concern termed ‘fracture points,’ which refer to the tense and damaging relationship between top and general management.

A fracture point is the place in the organisational structure is where strategy deviates from its intended course, largely because the general managers’ views have been ignored.

A fracture point is the place in the organisational structure is where strategy deviates from its intended course

General managers from a broad variety of companies repeatedly highlight the overwhelming challenge of getting top management to listen to critical messages coming from the bottom up. These are messages top management, at times, don’t wish to even acknowledge.

The same is true about bribery and corruption, which the Kakabadse Global Studies further identify as commonplace around the world.

Operating abroad and in regimes where governance is lax, our research shows that 82 per cent of companies issue bribes regularly through their agents.

The response from the majority of boards is to turn a blind eye. However, general managers are still obliged to meet their local sales targets. In the same vein, geopolitical concerns are just one of many issues the board conveniently sets aside.

Minimising geopolitical risks

In order to reduce geopolitical risk legitimately, the most widely accepted approaches are to:
• Have geopolitical experts on hand to advise the board
• Arrange geopolitical seminars to inform the board and the C-suite
• Appoint a specialist geopolitical director onto the board to offer insights on the damaging effects of sensitive points in the world

These are all tried—and in some cases, tired—options. However, a better route is to first listen to the general managers. They can provide invaluable insight into the true impact of geopolitical tensions and localities in which the company functions.

Sadly, not listening is the legacy of most medium-to-large organisations. The reason for this is the continued neglect of strategy delivery.

Sadly, not listening is the legacy of most medium-to-large organisations

To achieve best practice, 20 per cent of management attention should be devoted to strategy creation, and 80 per cent to the strategy delivery. For so many companies, the opposite is true. Lack of attention, until it is too late, to geopolitical risk is just one symptom of inadequate strategy delivery.

Most general managers are not brought into the future strategy-creating discussion. By failing in this regard, top management believe in their predictions, but these are devoid of the latest and often messy reality regarding what is actually happening in markets and communities.

Russia-Ukraine: the war no one—and everyone—saw coming

The Russia-Ukraine conflict is a case in point. The tension between Russia and the US and NATO led to an epic meeting in Bucharest in 2008, where Russia warned the West to cease its build-up of arms in Ukraine.

Providing a defence capability for Ukraine, as a newly-formed state, was acceptable. However, the magnitude of the arms build-up was seen as a threat to Russian sovereignty.

In the intervening years, Putin made numerous public statements regarding limiting the growing build-up of arms in the region. He even attempted an appeasement strategy, offering a public partnership with the US.

The general managers of many western companies operating in Russia and Ukraine had been living with these tensions for over 16 years. However, from the board’s perspective, no war had occurred at the time, so why would there be an imminent one now?

Companies repeatedly reposition their assets and move from one country to another for one reason alone—to realise competitive advantage.

Yet, as far as geopolitics are concerned, companies tend to relocate at the last minute or sometimes not all. Despite the geopolitical risk, relocating assets may not make competitive sense in terms of competitive advantage and from the perspective of the board.

Attending geopolitical programmes makes little or no difference. Dealing with fracture points does.

Improving the strategy creation and delivery process requires the full participation of general managers. At the same time, minimising geopolitical risk requires better listening to general managers and strategy delivery to enhance the health of the firm.

Nada Kakabadse is professor of policy, governance and ethics, and Andrew Kakabadse is professor of governance and leadership, both at Henley Business School.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • AI decision-making presents new ethical risks
    May 18, 2022
    AI thinker

    Businesses are allowing artificial intelligence to make decisions that need a human touch. Boards must balance the risks and benefits.

  • Why risk perception is vital
    June 9, 2022

    It is easy to see the tragic situation unfolding in Ukraine in terms of a failure of risk perception by both Russia and the West.

  • How 'risk blindness' threatens the effectiveness of board decisions
    January 25, 2022
    Businesswoman on a cliff edge

    A board's highly sophisticated procedure for making risk decisions can often be undermined by a failure to identify risk in the first place.

  • Embrace data analytics to boost risk assessment, advises CIIA
    November 30, 2022
    risk data analytics

    Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors’ report cites a lack of skills, resources and time as organisational barriers to effective analysis.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Andrew Kakabadse, board effectiveness, corporate culture, geopolitical risk, Henley Business School, leadership, Nada Kakabadse, NATO, risk, risk management, strategy, Ukraine, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|