Skip to content

12 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • Twitter Elon Musk Twitter drops due diligence bombshell

      The high-profile lawsuit brought by Twitter against Elon Musk raises an issue close to all...

    • short selling investors How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • short selling investors

      How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • US boards diversity US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

How resilience reporting could help firms meet future challenges

by Gavin Hinks

Boards face a formidable piece of new work as the government pushes forward with reforms to corporate reporting.

Man looking ahead with business data behind him

Image: Metamorworks/Shutterstock.com

Proposals that come as part of an effort to overhaul audit and governance ask corporate leaders to master a new discipline: reporting on their business prospects long into the future in a “resilience statement”. For some this could mean considering the business environment decades ahead.

This will be daunting. The proposals represent responsibilities never before imposed upon UK companies. But, according to experts, it should provide the chance to take a deep dive into business models and the significant issues that could knock them off course.

“It’s an important opportunity,” says Andrew Jones, director of narrative reporting at Mazars, the professional services firm.

“As a board you have to look at this statement and set out how you think the business will manage over the short, medium and long term. Those timeframes should help focus the board not only on firefighting but also company prospects long into the future.”

White paper

Proposals for a resilience report are contained in the government white paper Restoring Trust in Audit and Corporate Governance. The 230-page document includes a host of measures intended to improve audit, the audit market and corporate reporting, the most significant being the introduction of a brand new regulator.

But resilience reporting stands out as significant. The proposals adopt measures put forward in a report by Sir Donald Brydon in 2019 suggesting companies write a statement that “incorporates, enhances and builds on” going concern statements and viability reporting, and considers the future “survival prospects” of a company. Sir Donald described it as responding to a “legitimate demand”.

The resilience statement asks companies to take a substantial step forward in fixing deficiencies in viability reporting

While not entirely new, the resilience statement asks companies to take a substantial step forward in fixing deficiencies in viability reporting, which although it has been in place since 2014, has failed to deliver on the needs of investors or the intentions of government.

According to the latest white paper, a resilience statement requires directors to set out how they are “assessing the company’s prospects and addressing challenges to its business model over the short, medium and long term…”.

By short term the government means 1–2 years, incorporating the going concern report currently made by companies each year on solvency. Medium-term statements should cover five years, longer than the average three years covered by viability statements so already stretching the most common practices.

However, in a novel move, the government also wants “long-term” reporting, though it offers no recommended timeframe, leaving companies to make their own judgment about how far into the future they peer.

Sir Donald Brydon wrote that the long-term section of a report should examine the “threats” a company faces and “why they believe the company is resilient in the face of such threats”, or how a company will react to threats.

The government also aims to include requirements for companies to undertake at least two reverse stress-testing scenarios, an exercise common among financial services firms but rare in other sectors.

Ownership

Focus, however, has fallen on the long-term element of resilience statements. A close reading of the proposals reveals companies will need to cover key risks such as climate change, supply chain resilience and digital security among many others.

According to Anthony Carey, a partner and head of the board practice at Mazars, these proposed resilience statements are so important that companies should not be left to make their own decisions about how they provide assurance of them. “Given their importance to society and to all stakeholders we think there should be mandatory assurance,” he says.

Their status, he adds, also means that they should be owned by the board, beginning life with executives before going to audit committees for review and then to full boards for approval.

Models

But perhaps the biggest question for companies is formulating an approach to completing an examination of key risks without a definition of “long term”.

Andrew Jones says the key ingredient when approaching this problem is that a resilience statement should reflect a company’s core drivers.

“This is intended to be a statement that is tailored to the company and should revolve around its business model, and its business cycle. Reflections on resilience should mirror both of those elements,” says Jones.

The absence of a definition for “long term” makes sense when the life cycles of different business sectors are taken into account. A retailer’s cycle may last two to three years; a car manufacturer’s five years; a mining company’s decades.
Each model and cycle will raise different risks. But that should also persuade directors to think more deeply about other matters. “Whereas a going concern review is about solvency—whether a company will go bust—a review of long-term prospects should push a board into thinking about, and reporting on, strategy,” says Jones.

“Spotting the right opportunities and managing them is a key part of resilience”

—Anthony Carey, Mazars

A resilience statement will demand thought on whether a company can evolve to meet future challenges; whether its business processes are fit for purpose; whether its resources will continue to offer competitive advantage and how they can be maintained. And, if not, why not?

This process, says Anthony Carey, invites a company to look at the big risks it faces. But one of the challenges, he says, will be to resist the pull of reviewing only “cataclysmic” risks; climate change and, or, pandemics, for example. Companies should also consider the possibility of a “long decline” that remains unaddressed. “One or the other can take you out,” says Carey.

There is another common mistake to avoid too: looking only at bad news possibilities. A resilience statement should also consider opportunities.

“The tendency when you ask people to look at risks is to look at the downside,” adds Carey. “Spotting the right opportunities and managing them is a key part of resilience.”

Investors will be watching closely. Carey believes resilience statements will offer an insight that could prompt questions they otherwise might not have asked. The critical issue is that resilience statements reflect the companies they come from. “It will be about asking whether this statement could apply to any company in the sector: is it a generic statement or is it specific? That will be a key measure of a successful resilience statement.”

The government is yet to reveal the final form of resilience statements—consultation only closed in July. But they are unlikely to go away. They‘re also likely to provide invaluable insight, says Andrew Jones. “Being willing, or forced, to look into the future is a uniquely useful exercise.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Corporate reporting best practice
    October 1, 2019

    Overview of best practices in corporate reporting for FTSE 350 companies in 2019

  • How technology could transform board evaluations
    November 6, 2017
    data, data analytics, technology

    Reforms to corporate governance could require greater board evaluation, but this needn’t be a headache. Technology in the shape of an external evaluation tool can help give businesses an edge, especially in the collection and anonymisation of data.

  • EU non-financial reporting: Good start, could do much better
    February 11, 2019
    EU flag, EU sustainability, Sustainable Finance

    EU companies now report under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). They've made a good start but there's scope to improve their performance and the rules guiding them, say campaigners.

  • NGO governance: finding solutions to future challenges
    June 11, 2019
    NGOs, NGO governance, global

    A recent event brought together experts from national and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to identify future governance challenges for the sector—and share possible solutions.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

audit reform, board responsibilities, Brydon Review, corporate governance, mazars, Regulation, resilience

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Twitter drops due diligence bombshell
  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|