Skip to content

2 December, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • FCA rules

      News round-up: this week in governance

      New FCA rules on ESG claims; psychologically safe board communications; IT and governance; how workers...

    • Proxy adviser warns LSE Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance

      Abolishing the public register of shareholder revolts ‘won’t stop capital providers exercising their democratic rights’,...

    • sustainability governance Sustainability governance is on the rise

      But despite greater corporate attention being paid to ESG, directors’ engagement with it is losing...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • purpose statement

      On purpose: crafting an authentic statement

      Purpose statements define how organisations align purpose and people. Here’s how to make a statement...

    • first-time CFO

      How to succeed as a first-time CFO

      The remit and responsibilities of the chief financial officer have changed, which can seem daunting...

    • ethical culture

      How to embed an ethical culture

      Business success depends on purpose—and therefore ethics—being the top item on any organisation’s board agenda.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uk corporate governance

      Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up

      The LSE’s response to the government’s panicky U-turn on governance regulation is not helpful to...

    • faith in the UK Audit reform is essential to restore faith in the UK

      When it comes to understanding what attracts investors to a capital market, the London Stock...

    • U-turn on audit reform An uncomfortable U-turn on audit reform

      The government’s bonfire of the regulations expected for audit reform creates a source of uncertainty...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • reporting elements Boards urged to retain ‘beneficial’ reporting elements

      Although the government cancelled the requirement, resilience disclosures ‘cannot be wasted effort’, says senior auditco...

    • energy transition Collaboration is key to UK energy transition

      Communication, innovation and engagement are needed for the move to net zero, an expert panel...

    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • gender diversity study Academics criticise BlackRock gender diversity research

      Its methodology came under fire, with some critics also pointing out it was wrong to...

    • diversity of thought How to boost diversity of thought

      Companies benefit from diverse workforces, but also from having the input of different opinions and...

    • minority NED Number of minority NEDs drops

      Although there is some progress in diversity in other board roles, research suggests that boards...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Risk Map: Top Risks 2024

      Control Risks' Top Risks for 2024 cut across the geopolitical, security, operational, regulatory, and cyber/digital...

    • A Director’s Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

      An internal investigation must be handled meticulously to avoid legal exposure, regulatory or criminal prosecution...

    • Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023 cover

      Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023

      The 2023 UK Spencer Stuart Board Index is a review of board composition and governance...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Dual-class shares threaten shareholder democracy and good governance

by Barry Gamble on May 12, 2021

Despite City enthusiasm for dual-class shares, corporate governance is largely unworkable without equal treatment for all shareholders.

Share listings board

Image: AshDesign/Shutterstock.com

We could be forgiven for thinking that the proposed changes to the London listing rules following Lord Hill’s report were a done deal. Powerful lobbying from the London Stock Exchange and other City players may have all but pushed the measures—including the introduction of dual-class shares for premium listed companies—over the line.

The recent announcement of multi-billion pound initial public offerings for London portrayed, as miraculously saved from the clutches of markets in Amsterdam and New York, must mean the advisory fees and bragging rights from IPOs are in sight.

The government’s stated post-Brexit aim “to make the UK the most open and dynamic financial centre in the world [and] reduce burdens” is spot on.

But many remain unhappy with some of the proposed changes which cut across the further aim of  “maintaining high standards of regulation”.

How is it possible to have an equity market with dual-share classes when “equity” means “equal treatment”?

The concern relates primarily to the abandonment of the principle of equal treatment for all shareholders. The critics see this as heralding the very death of shareholder democracy. How is it possible, they ask, to have an equity market with dual-share classes when “equity” means “equal treatment”? So “dual-class equity” is an oxymoron.

Sadly, this particular boat has already sailed. Dual-class shares have already been allowed for the recent LSE standard listing IPO of loss-making The Hut Group (THG) and others have followed. Only two pages of the 200-page THG prospectus was devoted to governance. The founder and major shareholder is both executive chair and chief executive, as well as being the company’s landlord.

In addition there is an executive bonus scheme linked to share price, which could be worth several hundred million pounds and, finally, the founder has a golden share to block an early change of control.

The governance regime here is much less rigorous than the Quoted Companies Alliance Code adopted by most AIM companies. One wonders in future what incentive AIM and other boards will have to maintain governance standards if it becomes the norm for advisers and market practitioners to give in to the special pleading of founder shareholders or, worse still, encourage such behaviours?

This lack of governance accountability is bound to leak to other companies. Boards will increasingly go native. Indeed why wouldn’t they?

Shareholders and governance

While strenuous efforts and seemingly elegant arguments might be made to the contrary view, without equal treatment for all shareholders corporate governance is largely unworkable.

We still experience many a governance failure in companies large and small. Even with the existing protocols, good governance—the G in ESG—is not easily achieved, so let there be no delusion that allowing dual-class shares will contribute anything to safeguarding standards; it will do the very opposite.

Founder shareholders holding extra voting rights or a golden share to prevent a change of control will be nigh on impossible for non-executives to challenge

Right-thinking non-executive directors doing their best to encourage a good approach to governance could be left with a feeling of why are they bothering?

To be investable, a company needs to show it has good ethical values, a strong responsible culture and adopts the right behaviours. That it has a board transparent in its actions so that shareholders are not left in the dark as to what is going on with their company. This requires a board process of constructive challenge so that the board properly functions as the agent for all shareholders.

Founder shareholders holding extra voting rights or a golden share to prevent a change of control will be nigh on impossible for non-executives to challenge. Such arrangements coming to an end through a “sunset clause” miss the point.

The opportunity of the early years post-IPO governance conditioning of entrepreneur founder shareholders is lost. Shareholders lose leverage and the Stewardship Code becomes inoperable. It would be naive to expect non-executive directors will be in a position to be listened to on governance issues, let alone influence founder shareholders holding sway. The completed tick boxes of the proxy advisers become fit only for filing.

Challenge and scrutiny

There are many reasons why a company would choose to IPO on a particular market. Valuations achieved, not just at the point of the IPO but in early and development capital stages also have a bearing. High standards of corporate governance within a balanced regulatory framework should certainly be a positive reason.

But have dual listings worked out in other markets? The roaring success of the Silicon Valley tech behemoths have produced their own ESG issues, many of which global governments are struggling to resolve.

The proposed abandonment of “one share one vote” is not widely supported and is unwelcome to the vast majority of investors. Even the CEO of recently listed Pension Bee has been quoted as putting the poor market debut for the IPO of Deliveroo down to “decisions around governance”; presumably having the dual-class shares in her sights.

Just like any contentious decision before a board, best practice corporate governance would require that these proposed changes need to be fully challenged and scrutinised. It’s not too late so to do.

Barry Gamble is an experienced private, public company and charity board director, chair of The NED City Debates, and senior adviser to the Non-Executive Directors Association.

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Research reveals Silicon Valley's growing appetite for dual-class shares
    February 11, 2022
    Map showing Silicon Valley area of San Francisco

    US tech companies are less likely than S&P 100 firms to have dual CEO-chairs, but they continue to push ahead on dual-class shares.

  • Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?
    February 15, 2022
    London Stock Exchange

    US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. London needs to take a more global view.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Barry Gamble, corporate governance, dual-class shares, Hill Review, IPOs, listing rules, listings, non-executive directors

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us





Most Popular

  • Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up
  • Sustainability governance is on the rise
  • Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance
  • How to succeed as a first-time CFO
  • How to embed an ethical culture

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|

Copyright © 2023 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap