Skip to content

12 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Dual-class shares come a step closer in the UK as Lord Hill issues review

by Gavin Hinks on March 4, 2021

The report recommends pushing ahead with dual-class shares on the London Stock Exchange, with a consultation on the proposals to follow.

Stock market board

Image: Shutterstock

London has moved closer to the introduction of dual-class shares. Though contentious, a new report compiled for the UK Treasury recommends pushing ahead with dual-class shares for the London Stock Exchange to help calm the fears of nervous tech company founders as they search for a place to list.

While some will welcome the proposals by the report’s author, Lord Hill, there are those unsettled by his conclusions. The measure is much debated in corporate governance circles and comes with a catch.

The report says shares with extra voting rights should last only five years; the maximum weighted voting ratio should be no more than 20:1 (that would mean a 4.8% shareholding would command 50% of voting power); limits on who can own weighted shares (a founder); and limits on the use of weighted shares (remaining a director and takeovers).

Competition from other markets

Lord Hill’s report says that founders seek extra voting rights because they fear their vision being “derailed”, or having their companies taken over before their vision is able to “come to fruition”.

But dual-class shares, along with a raft of other reforms Lord Hill proposes for the UK’s listing regime, are part of a bigger concern: London has been losing its sheen as a place to list.

“Why do we need to act?” asks Lord Hill in his introduction letter to the chancellor of the exchequer. His answer: though a listing in London is viewed as a “mark of quality”, between 2015 and 2020 London won only 5% of global flotations. The number of listed companies in the UK has shrunk 40% since a peak in 2008.

There is hot competition from markets elsewhere. “Commentary about increased flows of business to Amsterdam makes the point that we face stiff competition as a finance centre not just from the US and Asia, but from elsewhere in Europe,” writes Lord Hill.

The big competition remains the US where tech giants like Facebook are listed. But markets such as Hong Kong and Singapore have in recent years changed their rules in an attempt to capture the listing business of China’s tech behemoths. In Europe, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Ireland and Sweden all allow dual-class share structures.

‘Watering down governance safeguards’

Some will nod a welcome to the recommendations. The Institute of Directors (IoD) has supported dual-class shares. Though it has reservations about some of Lord Hill’s recommendations, the institute’s head of policy, Roger Barker, says: “It would allow founders to retain greater control of their companies for a period of time, and provide a shield against the short-term demands of the stock markets during the early growth and development phase.”

Barker adds that the conditions “rightly” come with conditions. There are those, however, disappointed by the dual-class shares narrative. This includes Lord Hill’s proposal to reduce the free float threshold to 15%.

In a letter sent to Lord Hill as part of his review, the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN), says dual-class shares and the lower free float limit form a “a trade-off that waters down regulatory standards at the expense of investor protection”. It adds that the proposals would be “unwelcome” for many institutional investors.

“We are concerned in particular that we are witnessing a ‘race to the bottom’ by major global stock exchanges seeking to attract listings by watering down governance safeguards,” the letter says.

In a litany of evidence suggesting dual-class shares do not over time provide greater benefits to shareholders, the ICGN cites a Stanford University study by David Larcher and Brian Tayan that concludes that companies with dual-class shares have “lower governance standards”.

Remarks by the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, in a press statement, appear to brim with enthusiasm for Lord Hill’s recommedations saying he has “more than delivered” on his brief. The Treasury will now move to a consultation on the proposals. The argument is not over: dual-class shares are not yet a certainty for London. But their stock appears to be riding high.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Introduction of dual-class shares could create 'unsackable CEOs'
    September 3, 2021
    Green figure on pile of counters

    “Making directors irremovable, for any length of time, will damage British innovation and damage corporate governance" says Oxford law expert.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Research reveals Silicon Valley's growing appetite for dual-class shares
    February 11, 2022
    Map showing Silicon Valley area of San Francisco

    US tech companies are less likely than S&P 100 firms to have dual CEO-chairs, but they continue to push ahead on dual-class shares.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap