Skip to content

1 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • EU CSDDD

      Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules

      More companies have added their voices to the call to make the EU Corporate Sustainability...

    • norges vote Norges Bank leads investor voting against Exxon and Chevron

      The fund seeks to push the companies into speeding up their climate transition plans and...

    • ESG battle ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Black Lives Matter: US corporates speak out

by Gavin Hinks

Companies are increasingly willing to take a stand on social and political issues. But experts warn that words must be backed up by policies.

Sign at protest after the death of George Floyd

Image: Ali Jabber/Shutterstock

As protests continue against the brutal killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis, corporate America has felt unable to remain quiet.

A slew of companies have made their views heard through press statements, tweets, TV ads, letters to customers and interviews, condemning racism and declaring the need for change.

The messaging has underlined the increasing trend for companies to become involved in social and political issues. For many others it will prompt difficult internal conversations about how they should demonstrate their commitment to core values, the messaging they should adopt and what it means to take a stand on such critical topics.

As more companies publicise their views, others will come under pressure to do likewise. Ice-cream maker Ben & Jerry’s tweeted: “The murder of George Floyd was the result of inhumane police brutality that is perpetuated by a culture of white supremacy.”

Nike, the sports brand, released an ad declaring: “Don’t pretend there’s not a problem in America,” and used the hashtag #UntilWeAllWin. Merck, the pharmaceutical giant, tweeted a message from chair and chief executive, Ken Frazier, following a TV interview, saying: “What the African American community sees in that videotape is that this African American man, who could be me or any other African American man, is being treated as less than human.”

Chip Bergh, president and chief executive of fashion brand Levi Strauss, issued a statement condemning racism and added the protests were also about inequalities in the US revealed by the Covid-19 pandemic, and about history. “It’s about a shameful and destructive lack of progress on race and equality in a country that celebrates progress in so many other areas,” he said.

While many of these statements seem easy to publish, business pages have carried statements from campaign groups revealing they have been inundated with enquiries from corporates seeking advice on how to best deal with their reaction to the protests.

That may be because—as a Washington Post article puts it—“silence is not an option” on this issue; any attempt to remain “neutral”, or duck the subject, is “contributing to the problem of racism”.

But there is an additional question for companies: it’s one thing to make statements, it’s another to live by the values you talk about. Already there are warnings that many companies rushing to have their views heard could find themselves under close scrutiny.

‘Political corporate social responsibility’

This could be through the composition of their boards. In the UK, for example, the Parker Review found only 53 of the FTSE 100 could claim to have at least one board member from an ethnic minority. Launched in 2017, the Review gave companies until 2021 to resolve ethnic minority representation on their boards. Progress is slow.

The lesson here is that observers will look for public statements of support to be accompanied by policy making. One London-based inclusion adviser warned: “It’s difficult to spot who is doing this genuinely and who is jumping on the bandwagon.”

“It’s difficult to spot who is doing this genuinely and who is jumping on the bandwagon”

—London-based inclusion adviser

And that is important because in the absence of guidance from political leaders the public increasingly looks to corporate chiefs to steer them through difficult times. The 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer found that while only 42% of people trust politicians, 51% trust chief executives. Among employees, 92% believe their CEOs should speak out on important issues.

Indeed, that is exactly what many companies have been doing. The growth of corporate responsibility  as a guiding concept, as well as a clearer understanding of the financial benefits of being in tune with public sentiment on political questions, has prompted many managers and boards to tailor both their business strategies and marketing.

But even if it is a marketing ploy, many commentators note it may still be significant. Australian academic Bree Hurst agrees and argues there is a need for “political corporate social responsibility” from companies because it responds to consumer demands and fills “regulatory gaps” left by governments.

“Among the gaps in the US system contributing to overpolicing of black communities is the failure to provide equal access to public goods like education, health care and even clean air,” she writes.

Substantive policies

Statements of support, or “solidarity”, have their uses, according to Doyin Atewologun, an academic adviser to the Parker Review. She describes them as a “very powerful influencing technique” that can have an effect, especially over competitors who may be compelled to respond in kind. But, she adds, they should not be delivered in isolation. They must be accompanied by substantive policies too.

“They are statements of solidarity that do not hold anyone accountable… and don’t actually show the role that [corporates] play in disrupting the structural racism that everyone is talking about”

—Doyin Atewologun, adviser to the Parker Review

“One of the challenges I have with the statements out there,” says Atewologun, “is that they are broad brush; they don’t commit the organisations to anything in particular. They are statements of solidarity that do not hold anyone accountable, generally speaking, and don’t actually show the role that they [corporates] play in disrupting the structural racism that everyone is talking about.”

Messages should therefore centre on the roles companies “perceive they play in society”, for example the way Nike relates to disadvantaged and marginalised groups.

There are two other risks associated with messaging during an event like the current protests, says Atewologun. One is that corporates associate action, or messaging, with “flashpoints” instead of confronting an issue in depth and over the long term. Or, as in the current case, accepting that “people of colour are grappling with this every single day and it’s not one big incident”.

The other risk, she says, is taking advice from the “loudest” high-profile voice instead of seeking out advisers with a “track record” offering guidance “drawing on research and an evidence base”.

In the coming weeks and months company leaders and boards will continue to confront the issue of rascism. Corporate responsibility is an increasingly important factor and more boards will need to accept it becoming central to the way they operate in society. Many consumers expect them to take a position. But those that do so without their own underlying policy changes may well be exposed by close scrutiny.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Shawn Purvis named as president and CEO of QinetiQ US
    January 31, 2022
    QinetiQ logo and website

    Purvis is currently corporate vice president at Northrop Grumman Corporation, where she leads the firm's enterprise services sector.

  • BLM protests see investors back boards with black directors
    October 4, 2021
    BLM protest in Washington DC

    The recruitment of black directors and the discussion of diversity in company documents both increased following the death of George Floyd.

  • SEC set to issue proposals on US climate change disclosures
    March 14, 2022
    SEC seal

    Three-quarters of the 550 responses to the SEC consultation are said to be in support of mandatory climate reporting.

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

black lives, black lives matter, brand activism, CEO activism, communications, corporate social responsibility, CSR, diversity & inclusion, Doyin Atewologun, Parker Review, policymaking, social media

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Dual class shares have become ‘dual class stock lite’

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|