Skip to content

9 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

ISS policy change puts nomcos under pressure to boost gender diversity

by Gavin Hinks on November 13, 2019

US proxy advisory firm will advise shareholders to vote against nomination committee chairs where there are no female board directors.

shareholder vote, shareholder dissent

Image: Trum Ronnarong/Shutterstock.com

The chairs of UK nomination committees (nomcos) could face the ire of shareholders over gender diversity on their boards after proxy advisers ISS revealed a change in governance policy for the UK.

ISS said this week it will advise shareholders to vote against the chairs of nomcos if there are no female directors on their boards. The move brings the company’s UK voting policy in line with recent changes to its US policy and marks a significant step change in the pressure on companies by targeting the people in charge of appointments.

The move comes after warnings were issued this week that nomcos are about to face new scrutiny of their work. Research from headhunting firm Spencer Stuart shows that just 4.7% of nomco chairs in its FTSE 150 survey were female. That compares with 52% of remuneration committee chairs and 24% of audit committee chairs.

Nomcos’ role in diversity

ISS noted that FTSE 100 companies were advised to aim for 25% female representation on their boards following the Davies Review launched in 2011, while in 2016 the Hampton-Alexander Review recommended FTSE 350 companies make their boards 33% women by 2020. These targets were recently extended to the executive committee and direct reports to the executive committee.

According to ISS: “The advantages of a diverse board are well established and promoting diversity in UK boards is a part of mainstream conversation now.”

ISS also notes that the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code calls on nomination committees to ensure succession plans should “promote diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds and cognitive and personal strengths”.

The policy changes comes after ISS ran its 15th annual consultation on proxy-voting policies.

In its report published this week, Spencer Stuart said nomcos were joining audit and remuneration committees in the spotlight over issues such as appointments of board directors, senior management, gender and ethnicity.

Last year’s update to the UK code placed a nine-year limit on chair tenure, and gave nomcos wider responsibility for senior management in addition to board positions.

“Given new provisions on chair tenure, nomination committees need to pay even closer attention to chair and CEO succession planning,” Spencer Stuart said.

“They should certainly seek to avoid both appointments changing at the same time, if at all possible.”

Remco concerns

ISS also made policy changes to tackle concerns over remuneration policies in Europe, asking remuneration committees to report on how they incorporate environmental, social and governance factors into “remuneration outcomes”. ISS says these factors should include “workplace fatalities and injuries, significant environmental incidents, large or serial fines or sanctions from regulatory bodies and/or adverse legal judgements”.

In the US, ISS focused its new policies on dual-class shares and share buybacks.

ISS said it would only back multi-class shares with a sunset clause of no more than seven years.

ISS noted in its report that 14% of new US public companies now include multi-class shares in their capital structure. Around 7% of Russell 3000 companies—an index of the largest 3000 traded US stocks—now have a multi-class structure.

Of the respondents to ISS consultation, 55% said a maximum seven-year sunset clause was “appropriate”.

On buybacks, ISS said it would vote on a “case-by-case” but warned that it would only support them as long as they are not used to “manipulate incentive compensations metrics” or present to a company’s “long-term viability”.

ISS said its revised policy would provide “safeguards”. It said: “While some buyback critics express concerns that boards may authorise repurchases at the expense of R&D, CapEx or worker pay, shareholders generally support the use of buybacks as a way of returning cash without creating an immediate taxable event for shareholders who retain their shares, and as a form of market discipline to reduce the likelihood of uneconomic investments and empire-building acquisitions.”

ISS recently found itself in the midst of controversy after announcing it would sue the Securities and Exchange Commission, the US financial watchdog, over new regulation for proxy advisers.

ISS claims the regulation redefines its services to subject them to tougher rules. The changes comes after a long-running debate which has seen opponents argue that proxy advisers wield too much power over corporate boards.

Gary Retelny, ISS president and chief executive, said: “We believe litigation to be necessary to prevent the chill of proxy advisers’ protected speech and to ensure the timeliness and independence of the advice that shareholders rely on to make decisions with regards to the governance of their publicly traded portfolio companies.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • FRC report calls for more diversity on nominations committees
    July 22, 2021
    Business meeting

    Nominations committees must be more diverse themselves if they are to boost diversity in their organisations, says a report for the Financial Reporting Council.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    January 13, 2023
    NED recruitment

    Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board; audit engagement's virtuous diversity circle.

  • How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation
    May 9, 2023
    sexual misconduct

    Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and now is the time to speak up for ethics.

  • Women fill more board roles, but fewer are CEOs
    February 27, 2024
    women board level

    Although female representation at board level has improved, most chief executives are men, annual survey reveals.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap