Skip to content

31 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

When fighting social injustice clashes with shareholder demands

by Andrew Kakabadse on November 6, 2019

Business leaders are often troubled by social injustice, but shareholders take priority. To resolve this, governments, investors and society must change.

Revolutionary fist graffiti on wall

Image: Kunal Mehta/Shutterstock

The idea that business leaders are unsympathetic to social, political and economic concerns is largely a myth. Indeed, many leaders care deeply about such issues, but the reality is that society’s desire to address social injustice is sporadic and inconsistent.

If the media exposes a scandal then business leaders tend to take immediate action to minimise any impacts on corporate reputation. However, this exposure tends to be short-lived, unless a company is directly implicated in a wider issue, such as child labour or the abuse of workers’ rights. Even then the practical consequences are often minimal.

Despite such a troubling lack of long-term impact, it can be surprising to observe that many managers and leaders are deeply troubled by social injustice. However, the dilemma they face when it comes to taking action is the response that their shareholders will have.

Shareholders still dump the shares of any company that allows profits or performance to dip, and so it is of little surprise that most companies try to ride out adverse news and hope for the best. The duck and cover approach is simply easier.

Shareholder pressure

Most organisations are not directly involved in social injustice matters. Often they are observers who happen to operate in volatile markets or countries and so do not come under public scrutiny. This means the company defaults its attention to shareholder demands.

Large investment funds put pressure on companies to reduce costs, or at least work in low-expense environments to maximise revenues. Yet, the most demanding of shareholders are not just the investment funds, but trade unions, pension funds and public entities such as large religious institutions.

These alternative sources of investment have to satisfy thousands, if not millions of pensioners and also cover high costs such as property and real estate, as in the case of churches. Pensions, trade unions and religious orders’ investment funds frequently and covertly invest in arms and other activities that operate in low-cost economies.

We all face global political and social concerns and only a very few companies make social injustice a critical aspect of their strategy

Add to this the number of countries that refuse to address social injustice—which includes probably all of South America, most African countries, most of former eastern Soviet states and a considerable proportion of the Asian continent—and it is little wonder that business leaders find themselves paralysed into inaction.

In fact, a considerable proportion of countries allow social and political injustice as a matter of course, often with the tacit support of western governments. However, consumer pressure is fleeting and inconstant.

We all face global political and social concerns and only a very few companies make social injustice a critical aspect of their strategy. Even some of most ethical companies that actively address corruption and bribery often close their eyes to social injustice matters because of the overwhelming level of adverse incidents that take place in so many countries.

Business as usual

In the absence of governments taking a meaningful position on these matters, and with the increasing demands of shareholder pressure exerted on companies, there is an overwhelming influence that allows trade with these nations to continue as normal.

Businesses that choose to exit a particular market experience a drop-in revenue and a negative response from shareholders. Additional sources of pressure include the press, media and consumers.

In the few cases where consumers boycott the company and its products—Nike, Nestlé, Starbucks, VW—the result is a change in company behaviour. Consumer action impacts share price and the behaviour of the company in particular markets.

In the vast majority of cases ordinary citizens and consumers accept social injustice over increased prices

Nike had to change its employee practices and cut out the use of overseas sweatshops; Nestlé discontinued the promotion of baby milk sales in Africa and, despite expansive consumer, media and political attention, the impact on its bottom line was minimal.

In the vast majority of cases ordinary citizens and consumers accept social injustice over increased prices and continue to purchase products and services while managing on a tight budget. Social injustices are not just “out there” but equally prevalent in our own country.

We cannot get away from the fact that we live in a transactional economy driven by short-term investment, demands for cost reduction and shareholder pressure to maximise share prices. Until corrupt governments are confronted, weak institutions are strengthened, and longer-term investment finance is adopted, social injustice will continue to rise in all of its guises.

Andrew Kakabadse is professor of governance and leadership at Henley Business School.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Shell faces shareholder litigation over climate risk
    March 15, 2022
    Shell logo

    Campaign group ClientEarth claims board members have breached their directors’ duties by failing to “properly prepare” for climate change.

  • Ericsson faces shareholder ire over Iraq investigation
    March 29, 2022
    Ericsson building in Stockholm, Sweden

    Reports say investors including Cevian and Norges Bank will vote against a resolution to discharge board liability over compliance breaches.

  • Directors' social networks reduce risk of corporate failure
    May 4, 2022

    Study says failure is less likely when a board’s “social network” is large, its managerial network small and its executive pay relatively low.

  • BlackRock to test shareholder democracy in the UK
    November 3, 2022
    Blackrock shareholder democracy

    Chief executive Larry Fink seeks ‘to translate individual investor views into voting instructions’ for the first time.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Andrew Kakabadse, business ethics, ESG, reputational risk, shareholder pressure, social justice

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|