Skip to content

29 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

ESG catalysts: how consumers can change corporations

by Stephanie Mooij

Some companies encounter obstacles to full integration of ESG principles. It may be that consumers have more power than they imagine to change corporate behaviours for the better.

ESG

Image: Shutterstock

It is a cold December morning in Paris. A group of concerned investors is gathered in a conference room with a beautiful view. We are all there to discuss environmental, social and governance matters (ESG).

I am seated behind a lady who is the face of ESG for a large investment firm. The first thing I notice is that she is surrounded by a cloud of perfume that smells like a brand notorious for animal testing. Draped around her chair is a stylish and expensive-looking coat, which is lined with real fur.

As I am trying to wrap my head around this, she reaches for a handbag which carries the label of a company known for unfair labour conditions. That led me to wonder the following: If we criticise corporations for producing these products under those circumstances but still purchase from them, what is it exactly that motivates them to change for the better?

Although corporations have been criticised endlessly in the uproar surrounding ESG, their side of the story is often overlooked in the academic literature. This led me to interview 20 large corporations in the Netherlands, the UK and Germany to better understand what drives them to embark on their ESG journey.

Reputations

Certainly, today’s global and interconnected world has increased its expectations of corporations; they need to not only be profitable, but also socially and environmentally responsible. Not meeting these expectations can result in damage to their reputation, a bad ESG score, or even litigation costs which may affect their bottom line directly.

So, why are there still so many scandals?

One can argue that without the demand for harmful products or without the pressure to “make a quick buck”, this would be happening a lot less. Unfortunately, many socially and environmentally coloured issues are often merely perceived as a “nice to have’’. In other words, they are not core to the business or culture and, therefore, easy to discard.

This is also reflected by the way extra-financial information is presented in sustainability reports; it often lacks a connection to the strategy and business model of the organisation.

At the other end of the spectrum, there are corporations that have stepped up as leaders and have made 
environmental and social issues an integral part of their business model. The question I wanted answered is whether it is external pressure or criticism that drives corporations to integrate ESG? Or, perhaps, the driver is engagement or active ownership from shareholders?

The reactive stance from 
corporations towards ESG is understandable, in the 
sense that they do not want to be too far ahead of consumer demand

It could also very well be that it all comes down to committed senior executives. 
What became clear during the interviews is that, although they believed in the business case of ESG, most embarked on their ESG journey because they reacted to their external environment. ESG disasters, especially, and the subsequent criticism seem to have served as a wake-up call for many.

Although there is nothing wrong with learning 
from mistakes, this reactive stance means that something must go wrong first. This “something’’ could be 
fraud, but it could also mean irreversible environmental damage or human lives.

This reactive stance from 
corporations towards ESG is understandable, in the 
sense that they do not want to be too far ahead of consumer demand. After all, there needs to be a market for 
their products. The companies I spoke to referred to this as “finding the sweet spot’’ and they emphasised how difficult it is to find a balance.

Consumer power

The reason for embarking on the ESG journey for most corporations is simple—consumer demand. In other words, we, as the customer, can play a significant role in driving ESG adoption.

I find this interesting, because even though we often blame the “big bad corporation’’, we tend to avoid scrutinising our own purchasing behaviour. Clearly, the demand for more responsible products or brands can drive corporations to do better. To make that happen, we should think twice about whether we agree with the values of the brands that we buy.

Do we want the people who made our stylish new jacket to be fairly compensated? Buying it means that you endorse whatever the corporation did to produce that jacket. Instead of just sharing the newest scandal 
on social media, we can take a stance with our purchasing power.

Of course, we need to trust that corporations are transparent about their production processes, so that we can make an informed purchasing decision. This is not that easy, as you really have to do some research.

Perhaps, if the social and environmental impact of products was more clearly communicated on the labels, we would be more inclined to either buy them or steer clear of them. 
For this to happen we need a way of measuring impact and we need that data audited. It is hard for the consumer to distinguish between the corporations who are trying to make a difference and those that are good at “greenwashing”.

Do we want the people who made our stylish new jacket to be fairly compensated? Buying it means that you endorse whatever the corporation did to produce that jacket

Similar to the difficulty consumers have in distinguishing the good from the not so good, the same gap 
is found on the other end of the investment chain.

After having spoken to many asset owners and managers, it became clear that there is a considerable gap between the data that is needed and the data that 
is disclosed. Moreover, they struggle with the incomparability of data and standalone reporting. 
These shortcomings are exactly why the ESG rating and ranking industry has become so popular.

Fortunately, the 
companies in my sample acknowledged this issue and stated that significant improvement is necessary in the way they communicate the business case of ESG.

The idea that corporations should better communicate the value-add of ESG, and how it is connected to 
strategy, is in line with the efforts of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). Unfortunately, this practice is still in its infancy and many companies are unsure of how to set it up.

If they do clearly communicate how they benefit from ESG in the future, it will remove several other obstacles that I found in the investment chain. For example, the obstacle at the asset-owner level where there is a lack of belief in the business case. Or, on 
the investor level, how to differentiate between outperformers and underperformers in the context of 
ESG.

Lastly, the ESG rating and ranking industry may 
become less crowded if companies report the information in a way that allows investors to more easily 
understand the materiality of ESG.

So, coming back to the question I asked myself on that cold December morning in Paris: what motivates a company to change for the better?

From the interview analysis it appears that if a 
company does not have internal catalysts (i.e. top management committed to the cause or influential change 
agents), the external environment can sometimes shock them into fundamental change.

Other times, the external shock (i.e. a revealing report by an NGO) is just not enough to truly change the company for the better. Instead, it often just appears as if the company has made changes, since ESG tends to be a peripheral issue to many.

So, I say we show them that we are not all talk. Let’s put our collective purchasing power to work and show the “big bad corporations’’ that we are here to help them work towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

It’s a big job, but many hands make light work.

 

Stephanie Mooij is a researcher at the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
    July 25, 2022
    global warming

    We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society to address global warming and climate change.

  • Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis
    November 16, 2022
    climate change energy crisis

    The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the courage to put oil, gas, and coal into stewardship.

  • Companies 'may inflate ESG performance' to boost ratings
    June 17, 2022
    Green stock market graph

    Researchers say firms may exaggerate their ESG performance over fears that investors will divest from their stock.

  • ESG communications: What boards need to know
    July 28, 2022
    ESG communications

    Here are some tangible steps to take that can help connect ESG to corporate purpose and long-term value creation.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

ESG ratings, ESG reporting, IIRC, non-financial reporting, risk management, shareholder engagement, Stephanie Mooij, UN SDGs

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|