Skip to content

13 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • Twitter Elon Musk Twitter drops due diligence bombshell

      The high-profile lawsuit brought by Twitter against Elon Musk raises an issue close to all...

    • short selling investors How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • short selling investors

      How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • US boards diversity US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Success for women in the boardroom, but not necessarily as chair or CEO

by Gavin Hinks on November 14, 2018

The latest Hampton-Alexander review reveals that women have reached a major milestone on FTSE 100 boards, but still fail to win CEO or chair positions in significant numbers.

gender diversity

Photo: Shutterstock

There’s good news, but also bad news. The good news is that the number of women on FTSE 100 boards has reached a major milestone. The bad news is that the same cannot be said of the number of female chief executives and chairs.

That’s the conclusion of the third Hampton-Alexander review looking at the progress of women in the boardroom.

One woman said she watched “mediocre guys coast to high-ranking positions based on likeability.”

The report celebrated the fact that in the FTSE 100 the proportion of women on boards has reached 30.2%, the first time the number has passed the 30% mark. That’s a significant rise from last year’s static figure of 27.7%.

But the number of women who make the highest level–CEO or chair–hasn’t moved. There were six female CEOs last year, and the same this year. There were also six female chairs last year, and that has risen to a “barely” improved seven.

In the FTSE 350 there are 22 female chairs compared with 17 last year, while the index actually saw the number of female CEOs fall from 15 to 12.

According to Sir Philip Hampton, chair of the review, the poor showing for CEOs and chairs comes “despite an ever-increasing pool of women with substantial board experience”. He adds: “A sharper focus is needed to understand what is happening in the appointment process for these really top jobs.”

Clues

Sir Philip’s review provides some clues. “Early insights”, he says, suggest that inexperienced senior independent directors (SIDs) may play it safe when recruiting chairs; job descriptions could be too narrow or written to benefit an existing board member; boards may worry that investors will complain that women are not perceived as having “City” experience; the interview process may not provide a level playing field; and lastly, search firms may suffer from bias, or stereotyping, when constructing shortlists.

One problem may also be that “everyday sexism” still has a grip on some influential figures. The review helpfully provides some anecdotes from women in the workplace. One woman said she watched “mediocre guys coast to high-ranking positions based on likeability.” Another complained she showed up to deliver a report for visitors who “asked me for coffee, white no sugar”.

“Women, we know, often fail to take on, or to be promoted to stretch jobs because they have an unwarranted lack of confidence…”

–Fiona Hathorn, Women on Boards

Others see alternative reasons. According to Fiona Hathorn, managing director of Women on Boards, a network for female executives, access to “stretch” jobs for women may come down to a lack of investment in leadership, or the fact that women tend to be collaborative and therefore come across as “managers” rather than leaders when interviewed. C-suite collaboration is also markedly different to cooperation in other parts of an organisation; as a result many male-dominated boards resist entry to women. Then there are simple, but significant, confidence issues.

“Women, we know, often fail to take on, or to be promoted to stretch jobs because they have an unwarranted lack of confidence and … they frequently have less information about what a senior role entails than others,” says Hathorn. “This means that when they are interviewed, they lack the leadership language to win promotion, even when their actual skills and capabilities make them the best candidate for the job.”

Progress will require better preparation for the top jobs, plus a “step change” in the way recruitment takes place to board positions, including open advertising for vacancies, instead of the traditional methods used by search firms.

Optimism

Other figures produced for the review may give rise to some optimism. For instance, there are now more female non-executives around in the FTSE 350: 757 this year compared with 684 last year, and 244 in 2011. That could suggest that the non-exec/independent director pipeline is improving. Improvement was also seen in the FTSE 100 where 36.5% of non-exec roles are now occupied by women, against 33.3% last year and 15.6% in 2011.

Sir Philip also remarks that on the wider figures, the FTSE 100 is on course to meet its 33% target for women on boards by 2020. It is possible that the current generation of executive directors will, in turn, become a new wave of non-execs and, potentially, chairs.

“We’re certainly now seeing more women coming through to senior levels and progressing to board level.”

–Susanne Thorning-Lund, Odgers Berndtson.

According to Kieran Moynihan, an adviser on board performance, senior independent directors will need to change the way they run the selection of chairs to ensure the process is “genuinely unbiased”. He also believes institutional investors will need to do more to push for change. Many investors, says Moynihan, echoing thoughts elsewhere, are preoccupied with appointing a “safe pair of hands”.

“As long as institutional investors leave it very much to the SID and existing board to appoint a board chair successor, you will invariably have a self-fulfilling prophesy where the existing board will, the vast majority of the time, gravitate to the comfort zone of a male board chair,” he says.

Release of the review coincided with the publication of figures from Odgers Berndtson, an international headhunting firm, also offering reason for optimism that things are changing in the search process. The firm said that for the second year running, 50% of the FTSE 350 placements it undertook led to a women being appointed.

“We’re certainly now seeing more women coming through to senior levels and progressing to board level,” says Susanne Thorning-Lund, a partner in the non-exec and chair practice at Odgers.

Thorning-Lund lauded a switch in attention at the review to focus on the management level just below the board as an area where gender diversity needs to be improved.

This year gender diversity received a boost from a revised UK Corporate Governance Code which also included measures to improve the number of women in leadership.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC), guardians of the UK code, wants “momentum to be maintained” towards more women on boards. Tracey Vegro, the FRC’s executive director for strategy and resources, says: “In the year when we remember 100 years of women’s suffrage, there is much to celebrate about gender diversity, but we must all now rise to the challenge of embedding diversity.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • More scrutiny on the way for ‘comply or explain’
    May 5, 2015

    The UK’s governance watchdog is to scrutinise the explanations given by companies for ignoring the country’s governance code.

  • PM: Too few women reach the top in financial services
    October 11, 2016
    Theresa May, prime minister

    Financial services firms sign up to charter committing them to promote women in top roles.

  • Tech skills in the boardroom and the race for survival
    July 10, 2020
    board thinking creatively about strategy

    Executives and non-executives from a range of backgrounds met to gauge boardroom tech skills, board culture and adapting to the pandemic.

  • McGuire crosses the line for Sportech
    August 24, 2016
    horse racing

    Betting business Sportech takes a punt on Richard McGuire as non-executive director.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board diversity, Fiona Hathorn, FRC, gender diversity, Hampton-Alexander, Sir Philip Hampton, women on boards

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Twitter drops due diligence bombshell
  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|