Skip to content

31 May, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ESG battle

      ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

    • McDonald's antibiotics News round-up: this week in governance

      Investors challenge McDonald’s over antibiotic use; Norges Bank’s ESG push criticised; diversity box-ticking; revolt at...

    • boost audit Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls

      UK watchdog’s proposals include giving audit committees greater reporting responsibilities and addressing ‘overboarding’.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Success for women in the boardroom, but not necessarily as chair or CEO

by Gavin Hinks on November 14, 2018

The latest Hampton-Alexander review reveals that women have reached a major milestone on FTSE 100 boards, but still fail to win CEO or chair positions in significant numbers.

gender diversity

Photo: Shutterstock

There’s good news, but also bad news. The good news is that the number of women on FTSE 100 boards has reached a major milestone. The bad news is that the same cannot be said of the number of female chief executives and chairs.

That’s the conclusion of the third Hampton-Alexander review looking at the progress of women in the boardroom.

One woman said she watched “mediocre guys coast to high-ranking positions based on likeability.”

The report celebrated the fact that in the FTSE 100 the proportion of women on boards has reached 30.2%, the first time the number has passed the 30% mark. That’s a significant rise from last year’s static figure of 27.7%.

But the number of women who make the highest level–CEO or chair–hasn’t moved. There were six female CEOs last year, and the same this year. There were also six female chairs last year, and that has risen to a “barely” improved seven.

In the FTSE 350 there are 22 female chairs compared with 17 last year, while the index actually saw the number of female CEOs fall from 15 to 12.

According to Sir Philip Hampton, chair of the review, the poor showing for CEOs and chairs comes “despite an ever-increasing pool of women with substantial board experience”. He adds: “A sharper focus is needed to understand what is happening in the appointment process for these really top jobs.”

Clues

Sir Philip’s review provides some clues. “Early insights”, he says, suggest that inexperienced senior independent directors (SIDs) may play it safe when recruiting chairs; job descriptions could be too narrow or written to benefit an existing board member; boards may worry that investors will complain that women are not perceived as having “City” experience; the interview process may not provide a level playing field; and lastly, search firms may suffer from bias, or stereotyping, when constructing shortlists.

One problem may also be that “everyday sexism” still has a grip on some influential figures. The review helpfully provides some anecdotes from women in the workplace. One woman said she watched “mediocre guys coast to high-ranking positions based on likeability.” Another complained she showed up to deliver a report for visitors who “asked me for coffee, white no sugar”.

“Women, we know, often fail to take on, or to be promoted to stretch jobs because they have an unwarranted lack of confidence…”

–Fiona Hathorn, Women on Boards

Others see alternative reasons. According to Fiona Hathorn, managing director of Women on Boards, a network for female executives, access to “stretch” jobs for women may come down to a lack of investment in leadership, or the fact that women tend to be collaborative and therefore come across as “managers” rather than leaders when interviewed. C-suite collaboration is also markedly different to cooperation in other parts of an organisation; as a result many male-dominated boards resist entry to women. Then there are simple, but significant, confidence issues.

“Women, we know, often fail to take on, or to be promoted to stretch jobs because they have an unwarranted lack of confidence and … they frequently have less information about what a senior role entails than others,” says Hathorn. “This means that when they are interviewed, they lack the leadership language to win promotion, even when their actual skills and capabilities make them the best candidate for the job.”

Progress will require better preparation for the top jobs, plus a “step change” in the way recruitment takes place to board positions, including open advertising for vacancies, instead of the traditional methods used by search firms.

Optimism

Other figures produced for the review may give rise to some optimism. For instance, there are now more female non-executives around in the FTSE 350: 757 this year compared with 684 last year, and 244 in 2011. That could suggest that the non-exec/independent director pipeline is improving. Improvement was also seen in the FTSE 100 where 36.5% of non-exec roles are now occupied by women, against 33.3% last year and 15.6% in 2011.

Sir Philip also remarks that on the wider figures, the FTSE 100 is on course to meet its 33% target for women on boards by 2020. It is possible that the current generation of executive directors will, in turn, become a new wave of non-execs and, potentially, chairs.

“We’re certainly now seeing more women coming through to senior levels and progressing to board level.”

–Susanne Thorning-Lund, Odgers Berndtson.

According to Kieran Moynihan, an adviser on board performance, senior independent directors will need to change the way they run the selection of chairs to ensure the process is “genuinely unbiased”. He also believes institutional investors will need to do more to push for change. Many investors, says Moynihan, echoing thoughts elsewhere, are preoccupied with appointing a “safe pair of hands”.

“As long as institutional investors leave it very much to the SID and existing board to appoint a board chair successor, you will invariably have a self-fulfilling prophesy where the existing board will, the vast majority of the time, gravitate to the comfort zone of a male board chair,” he says.

Release of the review coincided with the publication of figures from Odgers Berndtson, an international headhunting firm, also offering reason for optimism that things are changing in the search process. The firm said that for the second year running, 50% of the FTSE 350 placements it undertook led to a women being appointed.

“We’re certainly now seeing more women coming through to senior levels and progressing to board level,” says Susanne Thorning-Lund, a partner in the non-exec and chair practice at Odgers.

Thorning-Lund lauded a switch in attention at the review to focus on the management level just below the board as an area where gender diversity needs to be improved.

This year gender diversity received a boost from a revised UK Corporate Governance Code which also included measures to improve the number of women in leadership.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC), guardians of the UK code, wants “momentum to be maintained” towards more women on boards. Tracey Vegro, the FRC’s executive director for strategy and resources, says: “In the year when we remember 100 years of women’s suffrage, there is much to celebrate about gender diversity, but we must all now rise to the challenge of embedding diversity.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • The Home Depot names Ted Decker as chief executive
    February 4, 2022
    Home Depot logo

    Decker takes over from current CEO and chair Craig Menear, who will continue to serve as chair of the board.

  • Ethics in the technology sector remains a headline issue
    January 26, 2022
    Businessman has biometric data scanned

    For a second year running technology is the sector that garnered the most news stories about ethical lapses—with data privacy a key concern.

  • A remixed roadmap for the future of board leadership
    October 18, 2021
    Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

    A recent report identifies the need for a new governance model that reflects the changing responsibilities of boards and their leaders.

  • Why the right sponsors are crucial to women's leadership progress
    February 3, 2022
    Women in discussion at business meeting

    Women need sponsors who will help them to access the mission-critical assignments that lead to top executive roles.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board diversity, Fiona Hathorn, FRC, gender diversity, Hampton-Alexander, Sir Philip Hampton, women on boards

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|