Skip to content

2 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Succession planning

      News round-up: this week in governance

      UK 'less optimistic' on ESG than European boards; holding stock; ethics codes; governance in Japan;...

    • C-suite barometer Leaders are positive about growth despite economic uncertainty

      Sustainability and technology are strategic priorities for boards in 2023, Mazars’ annual barometer of the...

    • EU CSDDD Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules

      More companies have added their voices to the call to make the EU Corporate Sustainability...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

MEPs protest over EU sustainable corporate governance measures

by Gavin Hinks on June 25, 2021

Members of the European Parliament have written to commissioners amid fears that key measures in the legislation will be watered down.

EU flag

Image: Wlad74/Shutterstock.com

There is a clash under way in Brussels over the future of measures to introduce sustainable corporate governance across the European Union.

This week members of the European Parliament wrote to commissioners to “insist” on the inclusion of key measures in the coming legislation they fear will be watered down. Meanwhile, campaign groups have voiced their concerns over delays. The new directive is certainly causing friction.

An EU consultation on sustainable corporate governance was launched in October last year aimed at writing new governance rules that would compel companies to address their impact on climate, the environment and society. It would also introduce mandatory human rights due diligence across EU states.

But the move has attracted much criticism, especially a study conducted by EY, the professional services firm, used to establish the reasoning for new governance laws. One group of professors delivered a brutal review saying the study “fails on every important dimension,” and presents “inapposite evidence”. Another group of academics wrote an open letter calling for a pause on developing new rules. “Well-intentioned but ill-considered prescriptive corporate governance reform can make it harder, not easier, to address the pressing social challenges,” they wrote.

‘Liability regime’ for human rights

MEPs are now concerned at a “lobbying campaign currently happening” against the reforms they called for in March, while NGOs worry that the European Commission has delayed introduction of the directive until after the summer and handed shared responsibility for pushing it through to internal market commissioner Thierry Breton. Development work so far has been handled by the justice and consumer affairs directorate.

In their letter MEPs’ demand the new legislation apply to “large undertakings”, “all publicly listed SMEs” and “high-risk SMEs” covered by EU law. They call for human rights due diligence measures included in the legislation to include “all risk along the entire value chain” and argue for a “liability regime” so companies can be held to account for “any harm arising out of potential or actual adverse impacts on human rights, the environment or good governance”. MEPs also call for sanctions that can be applied to companies who breach the rules that are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”.

MEPs say all of this is needed so new EU law is in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. “We expect the Commission’s upcoming proposal on sustainable corporate governance to have a level of ambition commensurate with the position of the European Parliament…,” the letter says.

Adding to the sense of crisis around the proposals, the NGOs—among them Amnesty International, Friends of the Earth and Oxfam—write: “The fate of these proposals and their new timelines for adoption is now unclear.”

Shareholders to stakeholders

Efforts to craft new EU sustainable corporate governance measures were always going to encounter obstacles because they embody an attempt to lever corporate purpose away from shareholders to “stakeholders”. This shift in thinking is one of the hottest debates in corporate governance at the moment. The UK’s Institute of Directors last year launched a new think tank aimed at researching stakeholder governance and sustainability.

The consultation document highlights ambitions to introduce new directors’ duties that would compel board members to “identify stakeholder interests” and manage sustainability risks and opportunities “in relation to stakeholder interests”.

These were underpinned by proposals to introduced mandatory links between sustainability measures and executive pay. Elsewhere the proposals also include measures to introduce corporate due diligence duties based on minimum standards.

The Commission has undertaken its consultation but as ever there will be much backroom wrangling before there is any resolution. The final shape of corporate governance for EU member states is yet to be hammered out.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code
    July 1, 2022
    Man with magnifying glass

    Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the boundaries of good regulation.

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    July 15, 2022
    Elon Musk Twitter

    Dutch stakeholder committees; Elon Musk's next move on Twitter; C-suite partisanship in the US; ESG 'no distraction' from climate change.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    August 5, 2022
    carillion fine

    Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the UK governance code?

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, EU, European Commission, European Parliament, EY, human rights due diligence, Regulation

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|