Skip to content

30 May, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ESG battle

      ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

    • McDonald's antibiotics News round-up: this week in governance

      Investors challenge McDonald’s over antibiotic use; Norges Bank’s ESG push criticised; diversity box-ticking; revolt at...

    • boost audit Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls

      UK watchdog’s proposals include giving audit committees greater reporting responsibilities and addressing ‘overboarding’.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

by Bobby Reddy and Brian Cheffins on July 1, 2022

Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the boundaries of good regulation.

Man with magnifying glass

Image: FGC/Shutterstock

The venerable Cadbury Code of Best Practice, the precursor to the modern-day UK Corporate Governance Code, is 30 years old this year. Its twentieth anniversary was marked with substantial media coverage, a book on the history of the Cadbury committee, and a celebratory series of essays instigated by the Code’s current custodian, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). Thus far, however, the thirtieth anniversary has passed with little fanfare. Admiration for the Code may be waning. In recent research, we go further and argue that the UK Corporate Governance Code should be abolished.

The Cadbury Code was a succinct two-page corporate governance trailblazer, pioneering the concept of “comply-or-explain”, under which companies could either comply with Code provisions or explain departures from it. As the years have passed, though, the Code has ballooned into the expansive UK Corporate Governance Code, which present-day premium listed companies must address.

Ticking governance boxes

While listed companies are not required per se to comply with the Code, its growth poses challenges for companies since the compulsion to “comply” rather than “explain” has progressively intensified. Shareholders and FRC guidance, as well as the way various Code “recommendations” are framed, have led companies to engage in “box-ticking”. The scope to deviate correspondingly is narrower than the comply-or-explain rhetoric would suggest. Accordingly, the high-growth companies that UK policymakers are keen to attract to the London Stock Exchange have precious little scope to engage in governance innovation and to reject ill-suiting arrangements the Code recommends.

Much of the Code now substantively overlaps with other, more prescriptive, regulatory missives

Another strike against the UK Corporate Governance Code is that the governance raison d’être underpinning it has fallen into irrelevance. The original Cadbury Code mostly drew upon already known governance ideas but helped to ingrain in the market approaches that were still relatively fresh. In the ensuing decades, those recommendations have been standardised in the governance space.

Much of the Code now either substantively overlaps with other, more prescriptive, regulatory missives, or embraces banal common sense ideals from which no board would ever deviate, or at least would never acknowledge divergence. For example, surely boards do not need to be told that a “successful company is led by an effective and entrepreneurial board” or that the “chair leads the board and is responsible for its overall effectiveness in directing the company”?

Not for the purpose it was intended

Moreover, in recent years, policymakers have counterproductively co-opted the UK Corporate Governance Code to advance non-shareholder stakeholder causes, such as worker engagement and diversity. Additionally, recent FRC reviews of the Code imply that environmental and social issues will come to the fore in future versions of the Code. The Code is ill-suited for this particular task.

The operation of the Code relies upon shareholders reviewing Code-generated disclosures and lobbying appropriate listed companies for change. Although many stakeholder issues will impact on shareholder value, meaning shareholders will not sit on their hands, they will only go so far when intervening on behalf of non-shareholder constituencies.

Surely boards do not need to be told a “successful company is led by an effective and entrepreneurial board”

Worker engagement, diversity and climate change are undeniably issues with which policymakers must urgently engage. Simply dumping such matters into the Code, however, amounts to passing the buck in the likely vain hope that the market will make the world a better place, and gives public officials an excuse to postpone tough and necessary regulatory decisions.

Finally, abolition of the Code arguably could help to revive the UK’s flagging equity markets. “Over-governance” has been cited as a factor simultaneously deterring companies from listing on the London Stock Exchange and prompting existing listed companies to desert the market and return to the discreet existence private ownership largely affords. Abolishing the UK Corporate Governance Code would be a meaningful statement that the London Stock Exchange is evolving, and ready and raring to go as Britain seeks to keep pace with a rapidly evolving tech-driven world.

Regulation is still needed

We hasten to add that while we favour abolishing the UK Corporate Governance Code, we are not advocating full-scale deregulation. Good regulation done well can benefit public companies, market participants, UK equity markets and wider society alike.

With most UK Corporate Governance Code guidelines being well-entrenched as governance norms, now is the time to move away from a comply-or-explain Code to a streamlined set of mandatory governance disclosures that will give shareholders the governance information they really need. Listed companies, for their part, will have greater scope to innovate in the corporate governance space and will avoid the blight of box-ticking.

The Code has given years of sometimes exemplary service. It is now time to put it out to pasture. Controversial perhaps, but boards should ask themselves: would corporate governance really be less effective without the UK Corporate Governance Code?

Bobby V. Reddy is assistant professor of corporate law, and Brian R. Cheffins is the S.J. Berwin professor of corporate law, both in the Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    July 15, 2022
    Elon Musk Twitter

    Dutch stakeholder committees; Elon Musk's next move on Twitter; C-suite partisanship in the US; ESG 'no distraction' from climate change.

  • ESG legislation: What are the FRC proposals?
    August 17, 2022
    FRC proposals sustainability ESG

    The FRC has set out its plans to help integrate sustainability into corporate governance, reporting and audit reforms.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    August 5, 2022
    carillion fine

    Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the UK governance code?

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    October 27, 2022
    company cashflow

    Company cashflow reporting; workers on boards; country-by-country tax reporting; FTSE companies and ethics; US corporate crime database.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Cadbury Report, compliance, corporate governance, corporate reporting, ESG reporting, Financial Reporting Council, FRC, London Stock Exchange, Regulation, stakeholders, UK Corporate Governance Code

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|