Skip to content

18 May, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs

      Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • AI will transform

      4 ways AI will transform board dynamics

      Opportunities and challenges are arising from the integration of artificial intelligence into corporate governance.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • meritocracy Fairness makes for meritocracy

      Favouring actions over persuasion, boards can take small yet extremely effective steps to improve diversity,...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

    • EU non-financial reporting reforms are an ‘opportunity’

      Firms can take advantage of the delayed implementation of CSRD and CSDDD to take stock...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • Director Reference Guide: Fostering the board-CEO relationship

      This Board Agenda Director Reference Guide on fostering the board-CEO relationship provides practical advice to...

    • Forvis Mazars AI 2025

      Performance Pulse: Are UK businesses prepared for AI?

      Forvis Mazars measured the AI preparedness of more than 300 UK businesses: 97% say they're...

    • Parker review cover

      Improving the Ethnic Diversity of UK Business, Parker Review update 2025

      The 2025 Parker Review update report, supported by EY. Over the past year, significant progress...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

The promises and limitations of institutional investors

by Iris Chiu and Roger Barker

Policymakers believe that investment institutions can be persuaded to take a greater role in corporate governance. But do they really possess the willingness and capacity to embrace their stewardship role?

Stewardship, investment, institutional investors

Image: Shutterstock

In January 2018, Jeff Fairburn, CEO of FTSE 100 housebuilder Persimmon, was awarded a total annual remuneration package of £100m. This was an eye-watering pay award, and was based on the approval of a long-term incentive scheme in 2011 by both the board of Persimmon and most of its major shareholders.

However, the real context was that much of Mr Fairburn’s recent success in boosting corporate earnings had apparently arisen as a consequence of the serendipitous launch of a government-subsidised scheme (Help-to-Buy), aimed at boosting UK housebuilding, which gifted a big boost to the sector’s profit margins.

As a result, an award of absurd proportions was made through an entirely legal process and, despite public criticism, Mr Fairburn felt under no moral compunction to refuse the payment. In his defence, he pointed to the fact that, although his personal reward was substantial, shareholders had also enjoyed significant gains in the wake of the fulfilment of the company performance conditions for the award.

Corporate governance bellwether

The Persimmon case can be viewed as a bellwether for the wider corporate governance debate as an increasing number of governments around the world (including those in the UK, US and EU) have expressed faith in the capacity of institutional shareholders to act as “stewards” of listed and, to a lesser extent, private companies.

[The ownership of corporate equity] arguably brings with it moral rights and obligations relating to the practice of good corporate ownership, which policymakers nowadays call “stewardship”.

Many have enacted regulation or legislation (like the UK Stewardship Code, the EU Shareholder Rights Directive and the Dodd-Frank Act) which empowers shareholders and encourages them to become more engaged in a high-profile corporate governance role (including the oversight of CEO remuneration).

Policymakers appear to be convinced that if institutions can be persuaded to adopt a meaningful corporate governance oversight role, the resulting impact on corporate performance, behaviour and accountability will be beneficial for the companies themselves and the economy as a whole.

In our new book, we examine the major institutional shareholders in UK corporate equity, including pension funds, retail collective investment funds, alternative investment funds and sovereign wealth funds. The rise of institutions as owners of corporate equity is in no small part due to the general trend of financialisation in developed economies, and collective investment vehicles have grown to become dominant owners and representatives of corporate equity.

The ownership of corporate equity brings with it historically defined legal and economic rights to participate in corporate decision-making. It also arguably brings with it moral rights and obligations relating to the practice of good corporate ownership, which policymakers nowadays call “stewardship”.

Long-term ideals

As owners of corporate equity, institutions should, in theory, be aligned with social interest in the long-term performance, wellbeing and sustainability of their investee companies. They should be eager to contribute their influence to the shaping of a healthy and sound corporate sector which delivers long-term savers’ needs through long-term value creation.

However, for a variety of reasons (described in the book and demonstrated by cases such as Persimmon), this optimal corporate governance role is often not realised in practice.

For a variety of reasons (described in the book and demonstrated by cases such as Persimmon), this optimal corporate governance role is often not realised in practice.

For example, most pension schemes and retail collective investment schemes are subject to short-termist pressures that can make the expenditure of significant time, or resources, on the corporate governance oversight of any particular investee company incompatible with their commercial imperatives and regulatory obligations. Indeed, regulatory obligations are often a key source of the short-termist pressures that funds face, even though these obligations are well intentioned for beneficiary protection and prudential objectives.

Private equity funds that play an engaged corporate governance role in unlisted enterprises can exert significant economic and governance impact on their investee companies.

Activist hedge funds can also influence corporate performance by using their legal powers to make certain specific demands of boards and management. Their activism is, however, instrumentally orchestrated to achieve certain objectives—primarily to benefit themselves—and it is uncertain whether their shareholder roles are necessarily for the good of the company in the long term.

We find that such investment fund models are, on the whole, also unlikely to promote a long-term ownership approach based on stewardship (although there may be individual cases of beneficial impact).

New players

Sovereign wealth funds are important new players in the corporate ownership universe, and are inherently less subject to short-termist investment pressures. In principle, they could be well suited to advancing the sustainable wellbeing of their investee companies.

Overall, we are sceptical of claims that institutional investors possess (in aggregate) the capacity or the willingness to genuinely embrace a “stewardship” role, based on principles of good company ownership…

However, many of them may be subject to the political influence of regimes whose public governance is viewed with suspicion in many western countries, although some institutions—such as Norway’s public pension fund—should be applauded for using their ownership rights in corporate equity to encourage improved corporate responsibility and behaviour.

Overall, therefore, we are sceptical of claims that institutional investors possess (in aggregate) the capacity or the willingness to genuinely embrace a “stewardship” role, based on principles of good company ownership—notwithstanding the contrary claims which are often made by their PR and corporate governance teams.

This is not to deny that the investment management sector performs an increasingly important function: that of intermediating the myriad and voluminous needs for savings on a global scale. However, investment management is just one economic sector among many, with its own commercial and regulatory concerns.

Shareholder primacy

In order to address public interest in a well-governed and performing corporate sector over the long run, perhaps part of the solution will be to re-examine the legitimacy of the traditional ethos of shareholder primacy. The policy expectation that institutions will embrace “stewardship” is itself a facet of shareholder primacy; it is taken for granted that shareholders have both the legal right and the inherited social mandate to guide corporate decision-making and behaviour.

However, shareholder primacy in listed companies has generated problems of corporate and market short-termism, an unhealthy focus on dividends and share buybacks, and often justifies the sacrifice of stakeholder interests for boosting financial performance.

Shareholder primacy is a narrow and limited premise for company law, since it does not take into account the reality that a company’s economic organisation is made up of many more sources of value than its top management and shareholders. The best companies already recognise this reality themselves.

It is now imperative to consider introducing a more stakeholder-oriented model in company law and the wider corporate governance framework.

It is now imperative, though, to consider introducing a more stakeholder-oriented model in company law and the wider corporate governance framework. This would in turn broaden the focus of corporate governance beyond the investment management industry, in favour of wider sources of accountability and oversight.

It may be argued that enrolling a wider group of stakeholders in company law would necessarily be disruptive for existing legal structures, creating confusion for directors’ duties and corporate decision-making.

However, the stakeholder voice could be incorporated in many practical ways, including board or board committee representation for employees and major creditors; making independent directors genuinely independent instead of vulnerable to dismissal by major shareholders; and establishing dedicated forums for engaging the stakeholder voice within a company.

Our conclusion is that the investment management industry will continue to flourish as a major industry in many economies, but should no longer distort the wider corporate system in a way that is inconsistent with the social and economic requirement for long-term value creation. This is a change of role that fund managers themselves may ultimately come to welcome.

Professor Iris Chiu, professor of corporate law and financial regulation, University College London, and Dr Roger M. Barker, managing director of Barker & Associates, a corporate governance advisory firm, are the authors of “Corporate Governance and Investment Management: The Promises and Limitations of the New Financial Economy”, December 2017, Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Good governance boosts companies' CSR performance
    July 5, 2021
    Board members looking at corporate reports

    Study concludes that “corporate board reforms... appear to have a positive spillover for non-financial stakeholders”.

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • Internal auditors sound alarm over corporate culture
    March 1, 2022
    Book marked "company culture"

    Two-thirds of internal audit chiefs support attempts to strengthen directors’ duties to “promote, monitor and assess” corporate culture.

  • Are UK corporate governance rules leading to market malaise?
    January 14, 2022
    Share listings board

    A recent article argued the UK needs "more directors who understand risk-taking, not virtue signalling" if London is to regain its status.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

CEO remuneration, corporate equity, corporate governance, finance, institutional shareholders, investment, long-term value creation, Persimmon, stewardship, Winter 2017

Search


Follow Us

Boardroom Intelligence

Stay in the know and register for free to receive our essential Boardroom Intelligence Briefing featuring:

  • Top governance headlines, expert opinion & boardroom insights, exclusive whitepapers & strategy guides, delivered to your inbox every week – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

By registering you will be able to access one premium article each month, selected partner newsletters and content, plus updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap