Skip to content

27 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Davos resilience

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

    • Elon Musk Glass Lewis Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis

      On Twitter, Musk complains that large proxy advisers hold ‘far too much power’ over shareholder...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

There’s no merit in untapped female talent for board roles

by Fiona Hathorn

We may know the benefits of gender diversity in theory, but in reality there are still too few women on boards. Setting targets and challenging unconscious bias could help, argues Fiona Hathorn, MD of Women on Boards.

Women on boards, gender diversity

Image: Shutterstock

Has the C-suite truly bought into the business case that diversity makes us smarter?

The short answer is that we’ve made some progress in the boardroom, but mainly on the non-executive director side—the easy option, some might argue.

When it comes to internal company executive appointments, cultural change requires investment and the will to use data to set objectives and track progress: what gets measured gets managed, and what gets managed gets done.

Men don’t intentionally keep women down, but they are not aware of the significant role that men play…

Our society is hardwired with biases and assumptions that limit us. Women need to overcome their self-limiting beliefs imposed by society, but men need to help women by welcoming them into their departments and teams. After all, only very few individuals cope well when they are not welcomed by others.

Men don’t intentionally keep women down, but they are not aware of the significant role that men play and, importantly, they don’t see themselves as a major part of the solution.

Billions have been spent on this by global firms hoping to change behaviour. It hasn’t. Training in unconscious bias only lets your employees know why you are working on changing the company’s culture; we all have biases and they are so deeply ingrained that they are almost impossible to change. A one-hour training course cannot transform those deeply ingrained, unconscious views. This is just one tiny part in a “change programme” where hearts and minds have to be won over.

Research shows that four-year-old girls and boys have few biases. By six years old, however, they have learnt how their society perceives how they should behave.

Diversity makes us smarter

But why is diversity important for business? Because diversity makes us smarter, improves margins and increases a country’s GDP as business grows faster.

This is not just wishful thinking: it is the conclusion drawn from decades of research from organisational scientists, psychologists, sociologists, economists and demographers.

According to Katherine W. Phillips in Scientific American, diversity enables innovation. Different people have different ideas. Research shows that socially diverse groups (those with a diversity of race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation) are more innovative than homogeneous groups.

Diversity enhances creativity, improves the bottom line and leads to unfettered discoveries and breakthrough innovations. It also enables problem-solving. And it changes the way you think. Simply interacting with individuals who are different forces group members to prepare better, anticipate alternative viewpoints and expect to achieve a consensus.

Diversity enhances creativity, improves the bottom line and leads to unfettered discoveries and breakthrough innovations.

Increased productivity and profits come from numerous sources and result in better business outcomes; greater customer loyalty; better negotiations and team effectiveness; efficient capital usage; and talent retention. It takes a lot of work and a unified team to leverage individual strengths in an integrated way, but the practical and creative insights of different perspectives make it worthwhile.

Organisations with only one type of employee will need to become more aware and more savvy if they are going to survive. Modern styles of leadership are now flat rather than hierarchical, with the leader sometimes choosing who steps into the middle depending on the specific issue of the day. The current buzzword in management is authenticity, not hierarchical command.

To make a difference ask yourself these questions: How balanced is my leadership team? Does my team have a wide spectrum of styles, traits, strengths and behaviours to ensure that we are ready for everything? Do my team members understand different styles of thinking and respect those styles to ensure results?

What else can I do to gain the advantage of an integrated leadership model?

Practical implementation

Let’s turn to practical implementation. How do you make things better for women and minorities, to enable them to get to the top within a level playing field?

Setting targets and talent management is key. To have a merit-based system you must ensure that you manage talent and ensure blockers are removed and opportunities are enhanced.

We have targets for everything in business, so why not for talent management? If you don’t have targets then it says something about you—are you scared?

The most common argument I hear against setting targets is: “It will affect performance, and we only hire on merit.”

Firstly, there is no evidence that targets affect performance. Secondly, the implication here is that if women are disappearing from the pipeline, it must be that they have less merit. Given that women have historically outperformed men—albeit slightly—after leaving secondary school, in most university faculties, and through to the mid-levels of most large organisations, the argument that there are simply not enough talented women is a very shaky one.

This is not fully explained by child-rearing, and it cannot be rationally explained as an evaporation of women’s talent at mid-career. So, if organisations are already meritocracies, and women have as much performance potential as men when they arrive in organisations, merit is clearly not as effective at identifying talent as the conventional corporate wisdom suggests. Why is this so?

Merit is not a fair measure

Research has shown that an obsession with a merit-based preoccupation in hiring activates stronger unconscious bias. The result is that hiring decisions made using merit as a focus are more biased in favour of men, compared with decisions made using fairness as a focus, for equally qualified male and female candidates.

The fact is that merit is not fair, nor does it guarantee objectivity. Merit is a movable feast of self-referential assumptions and stereotypes on the part of hirers. Despite good intentions and egalitarian values, no-one is immune from these assumptions, or their largely unconscious impact on decision-making.

Women do not lack merit (or confidence, for that matter). What they lack is a close enough resemblance to the prevailing masculine assumption about what leaders looks like. Quotas simply ensure that these dynamics are ruled out of hiring decisions.

If we are content to let social evolution take its course, we effectively sacrifice the next two generations of talented, ambitious women and girls to gender roles and stereotypes.

However, the blanket application of quotas can be problematic. Without careful tailoring, quotas can be counter-productive for industries that struggle to attract women in the first place. They can also result in cynical attempts to make up numbers by making token female appointments, or parachuting women into “new” roles. However, from my experience, executives who have diversity targets as part of their performance measures already engage in these strategies.

Targets or quotas can do three things that are essential to achieving real progress in gender balance, at least in my lifetime.

Search and selection processes become more rigorous and more innovative. Companies that now focus on “diversity of thinking”, or diverse collective intelligence, should take note that rigorous, bias-proofed, innovative search and selection practices are critical to enhancing an organisation’s collective intelligence by bringing in a broader range of talent more quickly. If this is your aim, quotas are a remarkably effective way of forcing recruiters to question their assumptions, check their biases, and think outside the square.

Unconscious bias in selection becomes a non-issue. Organisations continue to spend a large amount of money, time, and effort on unconscious bias training in order to reduce its effect on recruitment decisions. While this continues to be important, de-biasing could be achieved much more quickly and cost-effectively by applying a gender-balance quota for roles where a reasonable talent pool of women exists.

Temporary special measures achieve a critical mass quickly. If we are content to let social evolution take its course, we effectively sacrifice the next two generations of talented, ambitious women and girls to gender roles and stereotypes. Quotas can force our hand and ensure that we see talent in all its guises. There is no more motivating factor for the current generation of girls and boys than to know that their aspirations won’t be constrained by baseless assumptions about their capabilities.

Evidence or assumption

It’s time for organisations to engage in diversity of thinking to better understand whether their reservations about quotas are actually based on evidence or assumption.

The direct effects of historical bias and a stalling diversity agenda are becoming more and more evident with the publication of gender pay gap data—for example, witness the front-page furore generated by the BBC’s recent publication of its gender pay gap data.

Overall, today’s gender pay gap is 19%, and 9% for full-time workers, on average. But within the highly paid sector it is much higher. Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, announced recently that the gender pay gap within the financial services industry is 39%.

I do not know what it is in the legal profession but I suspect it might be above the UK national average.

Fiona Hathorn is managing director of Women on Boards UK and a trustee of the charity Fight for Sight. She is a former investment director for Old Mutual Asset Management and Hill Samuel Asset Management, running the global equities and emerging markets desks respectively.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • In extreme times, we need new priorities for corporate governance
    September 29, 2021
    People meeting in front of a green cityscape

    Corporate governance that prioritises shareholder profit maximisation is no longer adequate in light of the challenges that society faces.

  • The war for talent: creating competitive advantage through diversity
    December 7, 2021
    Magnet attracting diverse talent

    Companies that strategically invest in diversity and building an inclusive culture will become talent magnets in today's challenging market.

  • Top 150 UK firms have more women than men in non-executive roles
    December 14, 2021
    Silhouette of female executive

    Board diversity push sees 51% of non-exec roles held by women, compared with just 24% of executive committee positions.

  • MHP chair offers a case study in crisis leadership in Ukraine
    March 8, 2022
    Ukrainian soldier and flag

    John Rich is co-ordinating MHP's distribution drivers throughout the country: "If we fail the biggest distribution of food in Ukraine fails.”

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Autumn 2017, executive recruitment, gender diversity, gender pay gap, non-executive directors, Remuneration, unconscious bias, women on boards

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
  • Companies ‘will face growing climate litigation’
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|