Skip to content

28 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Sustainable Finance report: implications for investors and directors

by Filip Gregor on July 20, 2017

Reform of the financial system towards a sustainable economy has been detailed in an EU report, whose recommendations—which draw upon corporate governance reform—impact upon fiduciary duties in varying degrees.

sustainable investment, EU, ESG, sustainable finance, sustainable economy

Photo: igorstevanovic, Shutterstock

Potential avenues for reform of the financial system towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient and sustainable economy have been mapped out in an interim report, published by the EU High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance.

The interim report presents recommendations on directing investments that support sustainable projects.

Established last year by the European Commission, the Group is composed of 20 senior experts from civil society, the finance sector and academia. It is expected to deliver concrete policy recommendations to the European Commission by the end of this year in a final report.

The interim report presents recommendations on directing investments that support sustainable projects. More importantly, the Group explores how to transform the system into a more sustainable one by reforming the corporate governance of both financial institutions and public corporations.

Several of their recommendations have direct implications for the interpretation of fiduciary duties:

  1. The reflection of end beneficiaries’ interests and, as part of it, the integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors and sustainability in investors’ fiduciary duties;
  2. The promotion of integrated reporting and the reinforcement of transparency on ESG issues;
  3. The definition of European directors’ duties incorporating long-term sustainable value-creation.

The term “fiduciary duty” refers to an obligation based on trust to act in the best interest of another person. There are two separate forms of fiduciary duties that are relevant to improving corporate governance: those of institutional investors and those of corporate directors. What differentiates them is to whom the duty is owed.

Responsibilities of institutional investors

In the case of institutional investors and other financial intermediaries, the Expert Group recognises that the responsibilities owed by the financial institutions to their beneficiaries and clients (including an obligation to consider the principle of sustainability) is encompassed within their fiduciary duty.

Furthermore, the interim report reflects the common misinterpretation of the fiduciary duty as a principle that focuses solely on the maximisation of short-term financial returns.

In order to address this misconception and, in addition, establish sustainability factors across the investment and lending chain, the Expert Group recommends the formation of a single set of principles relating to fiduciary duty and associated concepts of loyalty to beneficiary interests and prudence in handling money.

A change in the interpretation of investors’ fiduciary duties will affect the understanding of the directors’ duties of listed companies and will have similar implications in terms of increased litigation risk.

Although it is generally accepted that legislation requires ESG factors to be taken into account, the Group also calls for clarification on those legal requirements, as there is a lack of clarity with regards to how far this duty extends and how it relates to other considerations[1].

Furthermore, the interim report states that the legal definition of investors’ and directors’ duties should be amended to include the management of long-term sustainability risks. The Expert Group even calls on the European Commission to push for such clarification and common interpretation of fiduciary duty at the international level via an OECD convention.

This clarification may also have major implications on listed companies. The above-mentioned changes would assist beneficiaries and clients of financial institutions in claiming damages arising from financial institutions, by ignoring material ESG risks and not acting in their client’s best interests.

This will arguably change the expectations of investors regarding their investee companies and their directors, in terms of identifying and managing such risks and developing long-term economic plans to contain them.

Eventually, a change in the interpretation of investors’ fiduciary duties will affect the understanding of the directors’ duties of listed companies and will have similar implications in terms of increased litigation risk.

Responsibilities of EU company directors

The High-Level Expert Group also addressed the question of governance of listed companies and the duties of their directors. The Group argues that developing a set of principles of corporate governance and stewardship that incorporate long-term and sustainable value-creation should be a central objective at the European level.

The report addresses this point at a fairly general level, but it identifies the definition of European directors’ duties as one of the principal means to improve corporate governance.[2] This and other corporate governance-related recommendations will be further expanded upon in the final report.

The law recognises that directors’ duties are owed to the company, rather than to the shareholders. This point was recently confirmed by a study funded by the European Commission. Therefore, corporate directors are already under an obligation to proactively and critically evaluate the material financial risks to, and opportunities for, their business.

ESG factors

Furthermore, European directors are legally permitted and required to take into account ESG factors when they meet the materiality threshold.

ESG risks are increasingly seen as financially material, both in positive terms (high ESG performance is correlated with improved long-term financial performance) and in negative or defensive terms (ignoring them can result in lower returns or losses, directly through stranded assets; and indirectly through the vulnerability of companies to regulatory investigations, litigation, regulatory changes and reputation/brand damage).

From the perspective of integrated reporting and governance, ESG issues represent a different kind of capital that is essential, alongside the financial capital, to foster the long-term success of the company.

Evidently, such an understanding of directors’ duties, and to whom they are owed, prevents directors from properly considering the challenges of sustainability.

Adoption of a common definition of directors’ duty as considered by the Expert Group would assist in clarifying the misinterpretation of the term currently espoused by the dominant corporate model, which serves the perceived interests of shareholders in a short-term manner, rather than promoting long-term sustainable value-creation.

This narrow model has directed the focus of executives and boards towards managing short-term increases of market value. Evidently, such an understanding of directors’ duties, and to whom they are owed, prevents directors from properly considering the challenges of sustainability.

Such clarification would have two major implications for companies and their directors. Firstly, it would act as a defence for their refocus on long-term strategy, instead of focusing on the short-term due to pressure from shareholders.

Secondly, and if coupled with a similar clarification of investors’ fiduciary duties, it would increase the the risk of litigation if they fail to properly consider material ESG risks and plan for a sustainable future. Concerned shareholders could then hold them accountable for harming the company’s prospects.

Short-termism—the biggest obstacle to a sustainable economy

The interim report notes that the pressure to maximise short-term returns prevents investors and publicly listed companies from properly considering strategy, risks and opportunities: “the time horizon in finance is typically much shorter than the time horizon needed to address society’s pressing challenges; and the conception of risk in finance is typically much narrower than one that effectively captures economic, social and environmental sustainability”.[3]

Any solution to short-termism must, in addition to expanding and broadening an investor’s horizon, recognise that companies need to be protected from this pressure to maximise short-term shareholder value. Corporate governance policies must encourage companies to focus on sustainable long-term strategies directly, rather than bend to the will of investors.

This is only possible if the policy is built on the recognition that shareholders do not run or own companies, because an over-reliance on their role increases the pressure on company managers to put the interests of shareholders first, and therefore sustainability, ESG and indeed any other factors second—irrespective of their importance for the company’s longevity and success.

References:

[1] Financing a Sustainable European Economy, section lll, p.23.

[2] Ibid., section Vl, p.60

[3] Ibid., section lll, p.19

Filip Gregor is head of responsible companies section at Frank Bold, a purpose-driven law firm that leads the Purpose of the Corporation Project. The project invites businesses, academics, policymakers and civil society to debate the future of publicly traded companies. Recent publications include “Corporate Governance for a Changing World: Report of a Global Roundtable Series” and “Revisioning the Corporation: A Short Guide to Sustainable Corporate Governance”.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Steps for a smooth and successful CEO transition
    January 18, 2022
    New CEO sitting in his office

    A succession plan is only the start: an effective CEO transition requires clear KPIs, objective assessment and ongoing board support.

  • Executive pay, sustainability KPIs and the climate crisis
    December 1, 2021
    CSO with green tie and leaf in his top pocket

    Linking KPIs to sustainability targets results in complexity. A focus on corporate purpose is a better way to tackle climate change.

  • Climate risk and supply chains revealed as AGM hot topics for 2022
    February 10, 2022
    AGM cubes on financial documents

    A recent webinar hosted by Diligent and Board Agenda saw experts unpick the big issues on the agenda at shareholder meetings this year.

  • Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures
    April 22, 2022
    Board risk meeting

    There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, ESG, EU, EU High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance, European Commission, finance, Frank Bold, investment, responsible business, short-termism

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|