Skip to content

1 October, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • auckland calling

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Auckland calling auditors; why ESG ratings matter; Victoria carpets’ ‘qualified’ audit; ethics and oligarchs; US...

    • pwc australia Review reveals leadership failure at PwC Australia

      Investigation into confidentiality leak finds ‘excessive’ power at the top and says poor decisions added...

    • board control Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • reporting requirements Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • ciia risk in focus

      Risk in Focus 2024: Hot topics for internal auditors

      Risk in Focus 2024 surveyed chief audit executives on their key challenges: geopolitical uncertainty and cybersecurity...

    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Implementing strategic change at a time of uncertainty

by Nada Kakabadse and Andrew Kakabadse

Companies are navigating one of the most unpredictable periods in modern history. Strategic change at these times is a challenging endeavour.

businessman in a maze

Image: William Potter/Shutterstock

Covid-19 has left organisations operating in an uncertain world. Boards and employees alike have faced a volatile, complex and ambiguous environment, promising only a challenging future and little guidance on how to remain productive. Normal methods and techniques that enable companies to demonstrate innovation and superior performance have been found wanting.

Strategic change during these times is a challenging endeavour that more often than not fails to meet key stakeholder expectations. Reasons for change are varied and new approaches are often perceived as being inconsistent with others’ values and benefits. This in turn triggers negative emotions that can adversely impact the implementation of change.

In addition change processes can result in a sense of inconsistency. For example, a hasty or secretly prepared downsizing strategy in the immediate aftermath of an emotionally draining and compassion-driven event such as the Covid-19 pandemic is likely to result in a significant stakeholder backlash.

Other markers of inconsistency associated unfavourably with change include:

  • What is being proposed—disagreement over the initiative’s content, scope or motive
  • How the initiative is implemented—disagreement over methods of integration, coordination or a perceived lack of resources
  • Values that are at odds with stakeholder expectations—disagreement over the norms being conveyed as crucial to change.

Scenario planning and foresight

Inconsistency between expectation and reality happens when our belief systems are challenged by interfering initiatives. These generate negative emotions that individuals go on to share with others. The scale and spread of negativity will vary from individual to individual and can include feelings that range from puzzlement and confusion, through to indignation, worry, shock, annoyance and apathy.

To counter this some organisations use scenario planning, a process that creates imagined future narratives based on factors arising from a particular set of circumstances. A focus is placed on “critical uncertainties” or forces considered important to stakeholders. Insights from this approach can help decision-makers weigh up various options and courses of action to invest in, although the results can be dubious in terms of identifying detailed resolutions.

Others use foresight—a discipline that provides a structured and systematic approach to gaining awareness of mid-to-long-term future possibilities. This improves preparedness and resilience, while also helping management identify relevant forces that influence future developments, and shows how they interact to shape an operating ecosystem’s transition and future.

Strategic implementation of change during uncertainty

The interplay between multiple initiatives and their subsequent implementation during the pandemic have been complex and often imprecisely conceptualised. Although the organisation’s foresight methods and techniques may promise a desired expectation, this seldom happens.

Achieving the desired results and planned outcomes is contingent on the implementation of strategic initiatives. This requires attention being paid to the people involved in the strategic implementation, and an appreciation of the chosen foresight technique being applied to the problem and the context within this is taking place. Evaluation and feedback throughout the process to correct the strategy as required is also of crucial importance.

Those who have to implement strategic change on the ground often feel that management is ignorant about how change is implemented

For example, once the board approves a strategic change initiative, it is then usually left to management to implement the desired change. However, if the management is focused only on a narrow field of control, or are embedded in autonomous governance structures with insufficient coordination mechanisms in place, inconsistency across the organisation is more likely to surface.

C-suite and various other management levels across the organisation often independently implement changes with a narrow focus on the initiative alone, or with limited attention to the broader social context that may already be under stress from other ongoing change initiatives.

A lack of managerial attention to social context is more likely to result in initiatives being perceived as inconsistent with change activities already in place. Many great strategic change initiatives and foresight plans never get implemented due to ignorance of future-making practices by those who have to implement them.

Those who have to implement strategic change on the ground often feel that management is ignorant about how change is implemented, and the level of harm it can sometimes cause. They believe management doesn’t listen and has lost touch with its employees.

Even middle managers who initially champion change often became disengaged and hesitant about how to move forward and struggled with this duality of position, being expected by managers to deliver results and at the same time having to respond to criticism from below. Middle managers experience their subordinates’ negative emotions first hand, and so it is important to understand activities and practices through which people in the organisation will have to engage with in the future.

Predicting the future and identifying fracture points

We’d all like to be able to predict what will happen to our organisation and understanding future-making practices is the only real way to achieve this. Whether the process is led by strategic or scenario planning, or corporate foresight, it is vital to incorporate the everyday work through which people in the organisation move forward amid uncertainties about the future.

The one constant is maintaining a clarity of competitive advantage that is championed by a committed management. Smart leadership displays an enticing strategic direction that has evidently addressed the organisational weaknesses surfaced by Covid-19.

Regardless of the strategy design elegance, not being responsive to local market requirements adversely disturbs competitive advantage delivery

It is also locating these weaknesses that is of critical concern. There is a necessity to gain a detailed appreciation of how and why strategy is delivered, and at which point fractures in the structure arise.

There are two primary fracture points that deviate strategy from its original course. The first fracture point is the interface between the C-suite and the board. This is where governance often goes wrong, chiefly as a result of management continually resisting the board due to its perceived interference. “Feed the board with information that gets them off our back” is the common refrain. While the board’s attention is distracted from the sensitive concerns requiring consideration, neglect of this governance fracture point can induce ever greater compliance stipulations from the board.

As this happens the board becomes progressively out of touch while the greater focus on compliance results in diminishing attention to stewardship. An out of touch board profoundly impacts levels of attention paid to the challenges that arise at the second fracture point—where competitive advantage is derailed.

The competitive advantage fracture point is the most damaging because it occurs between the C-Suite and general managers—in other words the company heads. The main point of contention is the relevance of the corporate centre designed strategy in meeting the needs of differing contexts. Regardless of the strategy design elegance, not being responsive to local market requirements adversely disturbs competitive advantage delivery.

A common perspective on strategic delivery

Most boards and C-suites recognise that 20% of the effort needs to be devoted to strategy generation. Yet, many have not come to terms with why 80% of attention needs to focus on strategy delivery. It is the appreciation of the finer points of detail concerning the execution of strategy, market by market and country by country that makes all the difference. Complexity increases with the ever-growing number of locations across which the corporation operates.

One of the most frequent laments of country managing directors is “what is the relevance of that corporate centre strategy for me in my market?” It is clear that bottom-up determined quality and granularity of understanding is what differentiates world-class companies from their competition.

What makes a genuine difference is the board becoming fully acquainted with the details of how strategy is delivered

To accurately predict the future requires the organisation must positively address the concerns arising from fracture point one. In doing so the board is enabled to become the steward of the enterprise. Distorted strategy delivery at fracture point two now comes under the board’s scrutiny.

A stewardship-minded board sympathetically represents the concerns of disaffected country heads, and the board’s grasp of finer detail and the clear delineation of roles and duties between them and the C-suite encourages a common perspective to surface concerning what is most required to make strategy work. With trust and respect enhanced the board’s intervention is perceived as positive and purposeful.

Despite this, the board being sympathetic to the general managers for sympathy’s sake is of little value. What makes a genuine difference is the board becoming fully acquainted with the details of how strategy is delivered. The capture of relevant and detailed evidence transforms strategy into efficient operational action, which aligns the board with the C-suite and with the general management.

Proof of this sharpness is exemplified by the clarity of expression concerning differentiation, which now has to be clearly defined in through the adoption of digitalisation, namely the evidence platform supporting purpose and mission. Proof of strategic delivery is ultimately in the integration of daily routines along with a direction that makes sense. When supported by a resilient board and management, the future is more sustainable than ever.

Nada Kakabadse is professor of policy, governance and ethics, and Andrew Kakabadse is professor of governance and leadership, at Henley Business School.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Companies must put equality at the heart of the race to zero
    November 10, 2021
    Trees reflected in buildings

    Singular pursuit of net-zero by 2050 could exacerbate inequality and derail our chances of a climate-resilient future.

  • Company law 'should place purpose at the centre of business'
    September 23, 2021
    Businessman holding a compass

    Report from the British Academy calls for new regulatory powers that would enable watchdogs to hold directors to account.

  • Meaning at work: the value of workplace rituals
    March 31, 2022
    Employees meeting in the workplace

    Many workers are struggling to find inspiration and purpose post-pandemic. Leaders must nurture workforce rituals that create meaning.

  • Lyssa McGowan takes the lead at Pets at Home
    February 16, 2022
    Pets at Home store

    McGowan, currently chief consumer officer at Sky UK, will become group CEO designate in April and succeed Peter Pritchard in June.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Andrew Kakabadse, business transformation, communications, corporate governance, Nada Kakabadse, strategy

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Labour commits to audit reform legislation
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Are boards losing control?
  • Boards on their ESG journey still have some way to go
  • BDO now biggest auditor in the UK by number of listed clients

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|