Skip to content

9 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Responsible innovation: implications for corporate governance

by Andreas Georg Scherer and Christian Voegtlin

To address challenges such as Covid-19, a responsible innovation process is required. Here’s how corporate governance can help.

Responsible innovation

Image: Shirstok/Shutterstock

The world faces unprecedented grand challenges of which the recent Covid-19 pandemic is just one pertinent example. Innovation is crucial for addressing these grand challenges and business is an important source of innovation and needs to be integrated. However, to harness the full potential of innovation in addressing grand challenges, the resulting novel products or services need to be subject to a responsible innovation process.

In a series of recent articles (in 2020, 2017 and 2019), we have worked on the idea of responsible innovation. We have proposed an understanding of responsible innovation consisting of three types of responsibility: (1) the responsibility to do no harm, (2) the responsibility to do good, and (3) responsible governance, which involves establishing institutions, structures, and procedures on multiple levels in order to facilitate innovations that suffice (1) and (2).

Legitimacy, effectiveness and efficiency

In our most recent work, Corporate Governance for Responsible Innovation: Approaches to Corporate Governance and Their Implications for Sustainable Development, we focus on corporate governance and suggest that corporate governance can help steer business toward innovations that avoid harm and do good. We discuss legitimacy, effectiveness and efficiency as criteria with which corporate governance models can be explored with regard to their contributions to responsible innovation and, ultimately, sustainable development.

Corporate governance ideally influences the corporate innovation process so that the outcomes are socially acceptable (legitimacy), meet sustainable development goals (effectiveness), and use appropriate means (efficiency). Drawing on political science and deliberative democracy research, we outline participative and reflexive structures as useful mechanisms for facilitating responsible innovation.

We propose that corporate governance can learn from deliberative democracy research. Deliberation aims at dialogue with stakeholders and at producing decisions that are informed by discussion, relevant information, and claims made by those affected. Deliberation should therefore be open to all potentially affected parties and be based on free exchange of information and opinions.

Allowing for a diversity of stakeholder voices guarantees social acceptability of the innovation

As such, deliberation can help corporations to (1) define the right goals (through public discourse), (2) choose the appropriate means (by involving stakeholder expertise) and (3) secure social acceptance (by securing the support of those affected).

Corporate governance can create individual and structural conditions for deliberation and reflexivity by including stakeholders with various perspectives and providing arenas for open discourse. However, to fully harness the positive potential of deliberation, corporate governance needs to make sure firms can find a balance between potentially conflicting demands: participation and expertise, between polycentricity and centralisation, and between diversity and consensus.

Involving stakeholder expertise and creating polycentric innovation structures allow for idea generation, while broad-based stakeholder inclusion and centralisation of the innovation process facilitate idea implementation. Allowing for a diversity of stakeholder voices guarantees social acceptability of the innovation, while having focused discussions facilitates the agreement on consensual solution. To achieve this balance, corporate governance can open up for different degrees of stakeholder participation and thereby build deliberative capacities that can be leveraged depending on the situation.

Stakeholder participation

In our research, we provide various examples alongside different dimensions of corporate governance. For instance, with regard to stakeholder participation, companies can include expert stakeholders in the composition of the board of directors or employ stakeholder advisory panels. This allows for direct participation of stakeholders and increases reflexivity through different voices. It provides expertise that helps to reflect on the goals and means of the firm’s innovation strategy and can contribute to innovative ideas.

With regard to modes of decision-making, the innovation process can open up to various forms of involvement of stakeholders in the decision-making process. Such an open discourse aimed at consensus among stakeholders when making decisions about investing in R&D and innovation secures social acceptance of innovation as the decision is widely supported.

Deliberative governance creates the preconditions for perceiving potential trade-offs between the legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness of innovative solutions

Adopting a legal statute that is emerging in several countries and ties the corporation to a social purpose (e.g., benefit corporation, business with purpose, etc.) increases managerial reflexivity about the goals of its innovation processes and legally obliges managers to dedicate resources to foster the corporation’s social purpose and thus to pursue innovations that foster sustainable development.

As a case in point, innovative solutions to address Covid-19 challenges often face trade-offs between legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness. We propose that reflexive and deliberative governance can help companies navigate these trade-offs, because deliberative capacities create slack resources for such innovations, e.g., through previously established stakeholder relations, intersections to the public sector and the sensitivity to social acceptability of innovation, especially when contributing to the provision of public goods like health care.

Deliberative governance creates the preconditions for perceiving potential trade-offs between the legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness of innovative solutions, because deliberation creates the necessary sensitivity to stakeholder rights and related legitimacy questions, and enables the search for innovative solutions that try to take all three aspects into account, as e.g., in the case of solutions relying on anonymous tracking of individuals to control the spread of the disease.

To summarise, corporate governance can facilitate a process that allows the company to develop innovations while taking societal needs and concerns into consideration, thereby increasing the potential for doing good and decreasing the potential for causing harm, and thus, ultimately, enabling a contribution to sustainable development.

Andreas Georg Scherer is a professor of business administration at the University of Zurich and an associate editor of the Business Ethics Quarterly.

Christian Voegtlin is professor of managerial responsibility at Audencia Business School, Nantes, and is a former section editor of the Journal of Business Ethics. He currently serves as associate editor for Business & Society. 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Corporate disclosures affect strategic ability of boards
    August 29, 2023
    Audit ESG reporting

    Meeting reporting responsibilities means boards are left with less time for strategic discussions, reveals annual survey.

  • Academic warns that 'good' corporations are bad for democracy
    September 13, 2021
    US flag flying on Wall Street

    So called 'good' corporations have “not actually changed, at least not in terms of their legal mandates”, claims Joel Bakan.

  • Can outsourcing improve governance?
    November 11, 2022
    charity governance

    How restructuring is allowing one charity to focus on what it does best, and improve its corporate governance along the way.

  • Governance must not stand in the way of innovation
    October 27, 2022
    governance and innovation

    As regulation increases, innovation suffers—but a diverse, savvy board can promote a corporate culture open to change.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap