Skip to content

31 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • annual reports longer

      Annual reports reach ‘door-stopper’ size, says campaign group

      The Quoted Companies Alliance puts the average length of a FTSE 100 board report at...

    • stakeholder governance Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Responsible innovation: implications for corporate governance

by Andreas Georg Scherer and Christian Voegtlin

To address challenges such as Covid-19, a responsible innovation process is required. Here’s how corporate governance can help.

Responsible innovation

Image: Shirstok/Shutterstock

The world faces unprecedented grand challenges of which the recent Covid-19 pandemic is just one pertinent example. Innovation is crucial for addressing these grand challenges and business is an important source of innovation and needs to be integrated. However, to harness the full potential of innovation in addressing grand challenges, the resulting novel products or services need to be subject to a responsible innovation process.

In a series of recent articles (in 2020, 2017 and 2019), we have worked on the idea of responsible innovation. We have proposed an understanding of responsible innovation consisting of three types of responsibility: (1) the responsibility to do no harm, (2) the responsibility to do good, and (3) responsible governance, which involves establishing institutions, structures, and procedures on multiple levels in order to facilitate innovations that suffice (1) and (2).

Legitimacy, effectiveness and efficiency

In our most recent work, Corporate Governance for Responsible Innovation: Approaches to Corporate Governance and Their Implications for Sustainable Development, we focus on corporate governance and suggest that corporate governance can help steer business toward innovations that avoid harm and do good. We discuss legitimacy, effectiveness and efficiency as criteria with which corporate governance models can be explored with regard to their contributions to responsible innovation and, ultimately, sustainable development.

Corporate governance ideally influences the corporate innovation process so that the outcomes are socially acceptable (legitimacy), meet sustainable development goals (effectiveness), and use appropriate means (efficiency). Drawing on political science and deliberative democracy research, we outline participative and reflexive structures as useful mechanisms for facilitating responsible innovation.

We propose that corporate governance can learn from deliberative democracy research. Deliberation aims at dialogue with stakeholders and at producing decisions that are informed by discussion, relevant information, and claims made by those affected. Deliberation should therefore be open to all potentially affected parties and be based on free exchange of information and opinions.

Allowing for a diversity of stakeholder voices guarantees social acceptability of the innovation

As such, deliberation can help corporations to (1) define the right goals (through public discourse), (2) choose the appropriate means (by involving stakeholder expertise) and (3) secure social acceptance (by securing the support of those affected).

Corporate governance can create individual and structural conditions for deliberation and reflexivity by including stakeholders with various perspectives and providing arenas for open discourse. However, to fully harness the positive potential of deliberation, corporate governance needs to make sure firms can find a balance between potentially conflicting demands: participation and expertise, between polycentricity and centralisation, and between diversity and consensus.

Involving stakeholder expertise and creating polycentric innovation structures allow for idea generation, while broad-based stakeholder inclusion and centralisation of the innovation process facilitate idea implementation. Allowing for a diversity of stakeholder voices guarantees social acceptability of the innovation, while having focused discussions facilitates the agreement on consensual solution. To achieve this balance, corporate governance can open up for different degrees of stakeholder participation and thereby build deliberative capacities that can be leveraged depending on the situation.

Stakeholder participation

In our research, we provide various examples alongside different dimensions of corporate governance. For instance, with regard to stakeholder participation, companies can include expert stakeholders in the composition of the board of directors or employ stakeholder advisory panels. This allows for direct participation of stakeholders and increases reflexivity through different voices. It provides expertise that helps to reflect on the goals and means of the firm’s innovation strategy and can contribute to innovative ideas.

With regard to modes of decision-making, the innovation process can open up to various forms of involvement of stakeholders in the decision-making process. Such an open discourse aimed at consensus among stakeholders when making decisions about investing in R&D and innovation secures social acceptance of innovation as the decision is widely supported.

Deliberative governance creates the preconditions for perceiving potential trade-offs between the legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness of innovative solutions

Adopting a legal statute that is emerging in several countries and ties the corporation to a social purpose (e.g., benefit corporation, business with purpose, etc.) increases managerial reflexivity about the goals of its innovation processes and legally obliges managers to dedicate resources to foster the corporation’s social purpose and thus to pursue innovations that foster sustainable development.

As a case in point, innovative solutions to address Covid-19 challenges often face trade-offs between legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness. We propose that reflexive and deliberative governance can help companies navigate these trade-offs, because deliberative capacities create slack resources for such innovations, e.g., through previously established stakeholder relations, intersections to the public sector and the sensitivity to social acceptability of innovation, especially when contributing to the provision of public goods like health care.

Deliberative governance creates the preconditions for perceiving potential trade-offs between the legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness of innovative solutions, because deliberation creates the necessary sensitivity to stakeholder rights and related legitimacy questions, and enables the search for innovative solutions that try to take all three aspects into account, as e.g., in the case of solutions relying on anonymous tracking of individuals to control the spread of the disease.

To summarise, corporate governance can facilitate a process that allows the company to develop innovations while taking societal needs and concerns into consideration, thereby increasing the potential for doing good and decreasing the potential for causing harm, and thus, ultimately, enabling a contribution to sustainable development.

Andreas Georg Scherer is a professor of business administration at the University of Zurich and an associate editor of the Business Ethics Quarterly.

Christian Voegtlin is professor of managerial responsibility at Audencia Business School, Nantes, and is a former section editor of the Journal of Business Ethics. He currently serves as associate editor for Business & Society. 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Governance must not stand in the way of innovation
    October 27, 2022
    governance and innovation

    As regulation increases, innovation suffers—but a diverse, savvy board can promote a corporate culture open to change.

  • In extreme times, we need new priorities for corporate governance
    September 29, 2021
    People meeting in front of a green cityscape

    Corporate governance that prioritises shareholder profit maximisation is no longer adequate in light of the challenges that society faces.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    November 3, 2022

    Companies retreat to their bubbles; introverts retreat to home working; the French get ahead on 'responsible capitalism'.

  • The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code
    July 1, 2022
    Man with magnifying glass

    Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the boundaries of good regulation.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

AI, Andreas Georg Scherer, artificial intelligence, Christian Voegtlin, coronavirus, corporate governance, innovation, stakeholders, strategy, sustainable development

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|