Skip to content

31 May, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ESG battle

      ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

    • McDonald's antibiotics News round-up: this week in governance

      Investors challenge McDonald’s over antibiotic use; Norges Bank’s ESG push criticised; diversity box-ticking; revolt at...

    • boost audit Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls

      UK watchdog’s proposals include giving audit committees greater reporting responsibilities and addressing ‘overboarding’.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

FRC scrutiny of audit quality reveals “unacceptable” level of issues

by Gavin Hinks on July 14, 2020

The Financial Reporting Council looked at 88 audits conducted by a number of firms and found that 33% needed “more than limited improvements”.

Magnifying glass on audit documents

Image: Sergii Gnatiuk/Shutterstock.com

There is fresh criticism of auditors this week, as regulators report a third of audits inspected during the past year required a level of improvement that is “unacceptable”.

Audit firms have also been warned that losing work may be a necessary element in maintaining audit quality.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) says it looked at 88 audits conducted by a number of firms and found that 33% needed “more than limited improvements”.

The statement comes just a week after the FRC gave the Big Four firms (PwC, Deloitte, KPMG and EY) a deadline for publishing plans to bring about an operational split between their audit operations and other services such as consultancy. The reform has been introduced as part of a drive to improve audit quality and head off the possibility of conflicts of interest at the firms.

The latest inspections, while acknowledging auditors are delivering good work, worries that they fail to reach the right levels every time.

According to David Rule, executive director of supervision at the FRC: “We are concerned that firms are still not consistently achieving the necessary level of audit quality. While firms have made some improvements and we have observed instances of good practice, it is clear that further progress is required.

“The tone from the top at the firms needs to support a culture of challenge and to back auditors making tough decisions.”

The issues found by inspectors remain bugbears of regulators, who have highlighted the same problems in the past.

These include impairment of goodwill and intangibles, revenues and contracts and provisions, including loan provisions. Over the past three years almost half (46%) of audit reviews have been driven by these issues.

Improving audit quality

The FRC’s report pulls no punches in pointing out that audit firms may need to make sacrifices in order to ensure the integrity of their audits, including parting company with clients.

“Firms’ senior management need to be clear that taking difficult decisions is an appropriate response to improving audit quality, even if it might sometimes mean delaying or modifying opinions, and ultimately losing some audit engagements,” the report says.

“The tone from the top needs to support a culture of challenge and back auditors making tough decisions.”

In addition to the “operational split”, the FRC says it will also make its supervision “proactive” and will soon publish findings on individual audit inspections. It currently only offers an “overall assessment”.

Of the Big Four firms KPMG came out worst from the most recent round of inspections. The FRC gave it a pass mark of 61%, based on examination of 18 audits. Top was Deloitte with 76%, EY on 71% and PwC, the largest auditor of FTSE 100 firms, scored 65%.

The FRC says that KPMG needs to improve its “culture of challenge”. Previously, the firm’s work concerned inspectors so much it was placed under “increased scrutiny”, although the FRC says the firm has made improvements.

“However, our inspection results show that high audit quality is not being achieved consistently and this report identifies key areas where the firm must make improvements more quickly.

“The overall inspection results therefore remain unsatisfactory and we expect the firm to take specific action to address this.”

Last week the Big Four were put on notice that operational separation of their audit units would take place by June 2024. They have until the end of October this year to give regulators their plans to implement the change.

While many welcome the measure, others remain sceptical that it will produce improvements to audit quality. The audit sector is still waiting for word from government on further reforms which could see companies forced to have joint audits and new powers put in place that would allow regulators to censure audit committee members.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Audit committee chairs 'are confusing quality of audit and quality of service'
    February 2, 2022
    Calculator on top of business report

    FRC report also warns that audit committee chairs have a "negative perception of joint audits", despite this being a key reform proposal.

  • FRC unveils new audit committee standards
    November 10, 2022
    audit committee standards

    Watchdog’s guidance to audit committees aims at expanding choice and addressing competition within the audit market.

  • FRC warns over climate disclosures ahead of COP26 summit
    October 27, 2021
    COP26 flag

    Regulator's annual review of corporate reporting says it will be “closely revising how companies report against the new TCFD requirements”.

  • FRC chief's comments spark debate over audit market cap
    October 19, 2021
    Big Four, Deloitte, KPMG, EY, PwC

    Discussions about the merits of an audit market share cap have intensified after remarks made by Sir Jon Thompson last week.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

audit, audit reform, Big Four, Deloitte, EY, Financial Reporting Council, KPMG, PwC

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|