Skip to content

2 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Succession planning

      News round-up: this week in governance

      UK 'less optimistic' on ESG than European boards; holding stock; ethics codes; governance in Japan;...

    • C-suite barometer Leaders are positive about growth despite economic uncertainty

      Sustainability and technology are strategic priorities for boards in 2023, Mazars’ annual barometer of the...

    • EU CSDDD Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules

      More companies have added their voices to the call to make the EU Corporate Sustainability...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Ethical business in the age of AI

by Peter Montagnon

Artificial intelligence is causing a revolution in business, but how should boards respond to the implications of technologies they don’t understand? The answer is to take an ethical approach and ensure human accountability.

AI, artificial intelligence

Image: Shutterstock

Whether we like it or not, technological advances are reshaping the way companies do business. Artificial intelligence, which involves the processing of huge amounts of data by machine, is becoming more and more commonplace, creating both opportunity on a grand scale and a daunting level of risk.

Because boardrooms are the place where opportunity and risk are assessed and judgements made, technology is now on the governance agenda. Directors who have shied away from tackling the subject in the past have less and less excuse for ignoring it, but the question is: where and how to begin?

At the Institute of Business Ethics we have been trying to work out some of the answers to the complex questions posed by the increasing use of AI. This article offers some tentative conclusions based on some core observations and principles. These are:

  • Data belongs to the person to whom it relates.It has an economic value which may be increased, sometimes in unexpected ways, by amalgamation with the data of others. An important principle enshrined in Europe’s new General Data Protection Regulation is that when companies use data in this way, they must respect the rights of the original owner.
  • Access to data confers an information advantage on the person or entity obtaining that access. This may create a conflict of interest, for example when it allows firms to exploit the vulnerability of their customers or their employees without their knowledge.
  • Human accountability is vital. Machine learning may lead AI to deliver decisions with an accuracy and complexity that defy mere human skills, but there must always be human accountability at the end of the process and steps taken to manage conflicts in a way that is fair and generates trust.
  • Boards are responsible for providing this accountability. They do not need to understand exactly how AI works, but they need to consider the implications of what it sets out to do and be prepared to address the risks. For this, most will need reliable technical advice from people they understand and trust.
  • In many cases there is a need to draw a line. For example it may be perfectly acceptable to price airline tickets according to overall demand at a specific time of day, but it is not acceptable to track a passenger’s booking habits to push up for that one individual the price of tickets he or she is likely to buy. Airlines that do that and are caught out face big reputational risk.

Risk appetite

These principles demand that boards make some important decisions; but while these decisions require understanding of the technology and the issues involved, they are normally ethical and philosophical in nature rather than technical.

The best context for them is as part of regular discussion on risk appetite and risk management. Take the question of driverless cars. It may well be true that the technology around driverless cars is already—or soon will be—sufficiently developed to lead to an overall improvement in road safety, even though there are still plenty of manoeuvres they are not equipped to do. Automated cars are not driven by people who are drunk or, like most of us, subject to momentary lapses of attention. Yet the overall improvement in road safety would be obscured by the occasional disastrous accident that could be attributed to failure of technology.

While the board’s decisions require understanding of the technology and the issues involved, they are normally ethical and philosophical in nature rather than technical

For businesses the critical question is how much risk they are prepared to take to secure the opportunity. In different ways, this question will be played out across sectors, and the key judgement relates to risk appetite.

Consider insurance. The insurance industry can now use information, often compiled by independent data brokers using mostly publicly available sources of information, to sharpen dramatically its estimate of risk. Social media postings related to drinking habits may be a good predictor of driving risk and therefore affect premiums. The ability to analyse and price risk with these techniques can give insurers a commercial advantage.

Yet there is also a reputational risk of being seen to be too intrusive and abusing personal privacy. Moreover, if individual risks can be measured in this way, the traditional insurance model of pooling risk no longer works. Why insure somebody’s life if AI tells you they will die at the age of 42 and six months? Why take out life insurance if AI predicts you will live to 103? For insurance companies these are existential questions, and there is little doubt that, over time, they will change the face of the industry.

Different perspectives

To steer their way through these ethical questions, boards need a great deal of wisdom and experience. Directors need to be alert to the issues but cannot simply rely on technology experts to give them the answer. A key skill is to bring together different perspectives to give a viable answer.

For example, what should a company go about restoring its systems after they have been brought down by a hacker? At that stage the tech teams are likely to be extremely risk averse. They will want to know that the defences are now watertight. But the marketing teams will be eager to resume normal business. Indeed, the whole company may be at risk if it cannot do so. The judgement for the board in this case is one of business risk, though they will be helped to make it if the two teams can talk to each other in language both can understand.

The IBE findings are that, while technology and the use of megadata must be on the board agenda, the context in which they are considered should not be overspecialised but more generally folded in to the discussion about business and reputational risk.

True competitive advantage comes not from using AI to extract value from customers, but in delivering value to them

It is worth emphasising reputational risk, particularly for companies with a strong consumer focus. Trust can be destroyed very quickly by a failure or abuse of technology. Systems that are overly intrusive, biased or which set out to exploit vulnerability are likely to result in reputational damage. In 2017 The Australian newspaper reported that Facebook had mined user data to reveal teenagers’ emotional state for advertisers. Despite Facebook’s denials, the article provoked public outrage against the company, which is facing a constant global struggle to maintain its reputation.

True competitive advantage comes not from using AI to extract value from customers, but in delivering value to them. As Ginni Rometty, CEO of IBM, says, companies are trusted not just by how they use data but whether they are trusted stewards of other people’s data. Those that consider and respond to the ethical challenges are more likely to be trusted. And those that are trusted are more likely to survive and prosper in the long run.

Governance has a key role in building these reflections into business models. If boards succeed in doing so they will be creating a framework in which new technology can be used to everybody’s advantage.

Peter Montagnon is associate director at the Institute of Business Ethics.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Annual survey reveals 42% of the public consider business 'unethical'
    January 18, 2022
    Employees commuting to work

    The Institute of Business Ethics says just 40% of those polled in its annual survey think business is ethical—down from 59% in 2020.

  • CEOs under fire: the psychology of leaders in a warzone
    March 11, 2022
    Bullet hole in glass in front of Ukrainian flag

    The business world expects bosses to perform under pressure, not under fire. How are corporate leaders in Ukraine dealing with the crisis?

  • Board effectiveness in the new world of work
    April 21, 2022
    Boardroom at sunrise

    Boards should use this post-pandemic period to reflect and reinvent themselves and their working practices.

  • Company law 'should place purpose at the centre of business'
    September 23, 2021
    Businessman holding a compass

    Report from the British Academy calls for new regulatory powers that would enable watchdogs to hold directors to account.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

artificial intelligence, data ethics, ethics, Spring 2019, technology risk

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|