Skip to content

8 February, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • CEO legacy

      Long-standing CEOs can leave a legacy of trouble for boards

      Performance and productivity can suffer after a long-tenured chief executive leaves the company, researchers find.

    • cost-of-living crisis Aviva highlights cost-of-living crisis

      Fund calls for ‘mindful’ pay ratios, showing executive pay is now firmly an issue for...

    • diversity talent pipeline News round-up: this week in governance

      Target diversity early; directors job market 'ossified'; US extends duty of oversight; 'kindness bias' hinders...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • mission zero

      Can the UK achieve net zero by 2050?

      To gain economic benefits, UK businesses will need resilient and flexible supply chains to provide...

    • governance recession

      What use is governance in a recession?

      Companies seeking competitive advantage in uncertain times will find that effective governance allows much sharper...

    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO legacy Long-standing CEOs can leave a legacy of trouble for boards

      Performance and productivity can suffer after a long-tenured chief executive leaves the company, researchers find.

    • diversity talent pipeline News round-up: this week in governance

      Target diversity early; directors job market 'ossified'; US extends duty of oversight; 'kindness bias' hinders...

    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Balancing act: stock exchanges and dual-class shares

by George Dallas on October 11, 2018

As stock exchanges allow dual-class shares in a bid to attract new listings, investors worry they that represent a “watering down” of listing requirements.

London Stock Exchange, LSE

Photo: Shutterstock

Stock exchanges form a critical component of the global financial market ecosystem, serving as gatekeepers linking companies to investors and as a platform for trading the securities of listed companies.

Investors, as providers of capital, are a key stakeholder base for stock exchanges, and in many areas investors and stock exchanges are aligned in their views about promoting the health of financial markets and the corporate governance of listed companies. But there are also potential areas of disconnect.

The International Corporate Governance Network’s 2018 conference in Milan featured a plenary session, including representatives from the international stock exchange community, on how exchanges influence corporate governance. The session also raised questions about the governance of stock exchanges themselves.

This ICGN plenary was catalysed in many ways by a specific development concerning many institutional investors—the proliferation of dual-class share structures. ICGN and the investor community more broadly regard dual-class shares negatively, insofar as they can entrench management, diminish external accountability and marginalise minority shareholder rights.

Compromised listing standards

The linkage of this issue to stock exchanges comes with regard to investor concern that stock exchanges may be compromising listing standards relating to dual-class share offerings as a competitive tactic to attract new listings. This concern relates most fundamentally to the potential for conflicts of interest, and is most apparent for those stock exchanges that themselves are listed companies, opposed to mutual ownership structures privately held by the brokerage community, and include some of the world’s leading stock exchanges.

The stock exchange and investment communities have joint cause for reflection with regard to the diminishing number of listed companies, particularly in key market economies such as the US and the UK.

While these exchanges have in place mechanisms to separate “church” and “state” between listing and commercial functions, investors can expect that this greater “for profit” orientation of stock exchanges will inevitably encourage exchanges to develop new initiatives for growth, and the maintenance of a competitive value proposition.

While that may be positive both for exchanges and for the markets more generally, the key risk that investors wish to discourage is the extent to which the search for new growth and profits will prompt a collective “race to the bottom” on the basis of watering down listing requirements and investor protections—particularly in areas where the exchange, issuer, and brokerage communities win, but the investor loses.

Broader questions

While the dual-class share debate will continue to remain a specific area of focus with investors, broader questions relate to the governance of stock exchanges themselves and their relations with the institutional investor community. Given the importance of investors as a stakeholder base, how does the influence of the investment community compare to that of the underwriting community—the companies, their brokers and their lawyers? How can the voice and concerns of investor be better heard?

It is important to build trust and mutual understanding between the stock exchange community and investors, and to identify clear areas of common ground, where possible.

Against these questions of investor concern there are also clear areas of shared interest between exchanges and investors. Clearly both communities promote sustainable value creation, for individual companies and the market as a whole; to this end exchanges play a particularly important role in supporting good corporate governance through their listing and disclosure standards.

At the same time the stock exchange and investment communities have joint cause for reflection with regard to the diminishing number of listed companies, particularly in key market economies such as the US and the UK. In a delegate poll at ICGN’s Milan conference, for example, 64% of conference delegates agreed that corporate governance requirements and short-termist performance pressures by institutional investors are driving factors behind the slowdown of IPOs and new listings in these markets.

Lower incentives

As alternative methods of finance develop to compete with traditional capital markets, investors and exchanges must ask themselves to what extent regulatory burdens and perceptions of investor short-termism may be contributing to lower incentives for public listings, and assess how to react constructively to these concerns.

It is important to build trust and mutual understanding between the stock exchange community and investors, and to identify clear areas of common ground, where possible. Constructive dialogue is one place to start, and this has begun.

Beyond this, an investor response to offset the potential disadvantages of public listing lies in the potential for stronger and more responsible investor stewardship, in which investors engage constructively with companies to support longer-term value creation.

And in return? What should investor expectations be of exchanges and how should exchanges consider and balance the concerns of investors as critical stakeholders? This is likely to remain an open discussion, one that might evolve from specific issues such as dual-class shares to the broader role of investors and other stakeholders in stock exchange governance. 

ICGN will continue to contribute to this debate.

George Dallas is policy director at the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN).

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Research reveals Silicon Valley's growing appetite for dual-class shares
    February 11, 2022
    Map showing Silicon Valley area of San Francisco

    US tech companies are less likely than S&P 100 firms to have dual CEO-chairs, but they continue to push ahead on dual-class shares.

  • Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?
    February 15, 2022
    London Stock Exchange

    US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. London needs to take a more global view.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, dual-class shares, finance, George Dallas, ICGN, investment, shareholders, stakeholders, stock exchanges

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Investors favour votes against directors over say-on-climate proposals
  • Shell overhauls its board
  • ESG grows in importance as driver of M&As
  • What use is governance in a recession?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|