Skip to content

20 May, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • senior executives

      How senior executives help boards form judgement

      Senior executives below the C-suite can provide critical board insight—if access is built on trust,...

      venture capital startup

      How venture capital boosts good governance

      It’s not merely financial support: venture capital expertise can put an early-stage business in the...

      AIM diversity

      AIM’s failure to act on diversity threatens governance

      The alternative investment market is not keeping pace on gender diversity, to the detriment of...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • senior executives

      How senior executives help boards form judgement

      Senior executives below the C-suite can provide critical board insight—if access is built on trust,...

      early warning

      Are you ignoring a crucial early warning system?

      When organisations choose to silence those who question corporate actions, it is bad for society—and...

      venture capital startup

      How venture capital boosts good governance

      It’s not merely financial support: venture capital expertise can put an early-stage business in the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

      stewarding AI

      AI is a ‘special case for governance’

      As AI use in the boardroom grows, it’s essential to focus on the ethical and...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • AIM diversity

      AIM’s failure to act on diversity threatens governance

      The alternative investment market is not keeping pace on gender diversity, to the detriment of...

      UK and US CEO

      Corporate shift toward experienced CEOs

      Leadership succession shows fewer first-time chief executives, especially in the US, according to turnover figures.

      female CEO

      Number of women in leadership stays unchanged

      In 2021, there were only eight female CEOs in the FTSE 100—a figure that is...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • board's role in a rewired world fgs 2026 cover

      A hard job getting harder: The board’s role in a rewired world

      The role of director is demanding intellectually, ethically and strategically. FGS interviewed 175 experts and...

      Internal Control Failure!

      This Chartered IIA report analyses FCA enforcement action and examines cases where weaknesses in internal...

      European Corporate Governance Barometer 2026

      EcoDa's report highlights emerging governance challenges for European boards, such as technology, cyber risk and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Campaigners rally to save EU corporate due diligence law

by Gavin Hinks on February 7, 2024

Germany’s threatened abstention from a key vote on Friday could lead the way to derail the new sustainability directive.

EU CSDDD

Image: Andy.LIU/Shutterstock.com

Favorite

Hundreds of companies, campaign groups and lawyers have signed a letter in support of new EU legislation compelling companies to undertake human rights and sustainability due diligence, following threats that the German government would abstain from a key vote.

It emerged this week that Germany could withhold its support for the new law—the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)—as last-gasp concerns grew over the burden it would place on companies.

An abstention could not on its own derail the CSDDD, but it could persuade other states to withdraw their support ahead of a scheduled vote in the European Council on Friday.

The campaigners’ letter calls on EU member state governments to “recognise” the “pivotal importance” of the due diligence directive and vote in favour.

‘Ensure businesses contribute positively’

“It is time for decisive action to ensure businesses contribute positively to our society and planet and align business and human rights for good,” the letter says.

The CSDDD mandates companies to define and act on due diligence policies, which check and address any “adverse impacts” in their supply chains on the environment and human rights.

Boards must integrate the due diligence policies into strategy; identify and mitigate “adverse impacts”; engage with stakeholders; and monitor due diligence policies.

Failure to comply could result in fines of up to 5% of worldwide turnover, while the law also provides civil liability route for damages claims.

The rules apply from 2027 to companies with 1,000 employees or more and a worldwide turnover of €300m (£256m).

Critical thinking

Late last week, Euractive, a European news service, reported that German ministers had said they would abstain. Previously, Germany has been concerned about the level of liabilities companies could face if they fell foul of the law.

There is speculation that if Germany goes ahead with an abstention, Italy could follow suit. Euractive reports that Sweden, Finland, Czechia and Estonia have also expressed concern in the past.

The CSDDD is one of two wide-ranging directives aimed improving sustainability performance. The other, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) came into law last year and will be implemented by large listed companies from this year, and large unlisted companies from 2026.

The CSDDD has always been controversial with campaigners frequently pushing for stiffer measures, while companies have consistently expressed concern about the cost and scope of implementation. One worry was how “adverse impact” might be defined. There were also concerns about impacts beyond the direct control of large corporates.

The EU has been pushing hard for sustainability policy as politics has polarised around the issue. Friday’s vote could be a nailbiter.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • EU delays vote on corporate due diligence law
    February 12, 2024
    EU delays vote

    There are fears the European Council may not gain the required votes to pass the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.

  • Campaigners protest against EU due diligence proposals
    September 7, 2022
    EU due diligence directive

    Objectors say the directive on corporate sustainability and human rights falls short, while companies criticise the demands it makes.

  • EU negotiates in bid to pass sustainability directive
    March 8, 2024
    human rights supply chain

    After the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive vote was delayed, Belgium has come up with proposed revisions.

  • B Lab calls for EU directive to keep sustainability ‘duty of care’
    March 8, 2023
    EU sustainability

    The not-for-profit body cautions that removing mandatory consideration of sustainability in due diligence threatens green targets.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 - UK insights

Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy