Skip to content

1 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • EU CSDDD

      Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules

      More companies have added their voices to the call to make the EU Corporate Sustainability...

    • norges vote Norges Bank leads investor voting against Exxon and Chevron

      The fund seeks to push the companies into speeding up their climate transition plans and...

    • ESG battle ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Growing backlash against ‘inflexible dogma’ of ESG

by Gavin Hinks on May 3, 2022

Experts warn ESG risks “mission drift” amid geopolitical and economic challenges, such as the war in Ukraine and energy prices.

Board members looking at corporate reports

Image: Freedomz/Shutterstock.com

ESG is suffering some serious criticism. As the dominant concept shaping corporate governance today, proponents could expect ESG to come under close scrutiny. But recent attacks have been vehement and even argued the invasion of Ukraine highlights the hollow nature of the ESG movement. Is the criticism justified?

The answer to that may depend on your point of view and how you expect ESG (environmental, social and governance) concerns to affect the running of companies.

The most recent criticism focused on the effect of ESG considerations on the provision of key essentials; in the context of the Ukraine–Russia war that is arms and fossil fuels. An article in The Times by Oliver Shah claimed a “monomaniacal focus” on ESG of some investors had seen them turn away from arms and fossil fuel companies and take decisions that should otherwise be reserved for a democratically elected government. Weapons are currently required in vast quantities and fuel is needed to drive Ukraine’s war effort.

“It is time to dismantle this inflexible dogma and replace it with something nimbler and more nuanced,” Shah wrote, adding that he wants ESG to be replaced with “common sense, decency and pragmatism”.

“The best part? There won’t be highly paid advisers or priests [institutional investors] lecturing from the pulpit of giant fund managers. There will just be investors who engage with boards thoughtfully.”

Shah is not alone in his ESG scepticism. Earlier this year one of the City’s most high-profile fund managers, Terry Smith, turned on Unilever, the consumer goods company famous for its ESG reputation. He worried the company was preoccupied with “sustainability credentials” at the expense of “focusing on the fundamentals of business”.

He took aim at management’s treatment of a kitchen staple. “A company which feels it has to define the purpose of Hellman’s mayonnaise has in our view clearly lost the plot.”

ESG investors

There is much to unpack here. Smith seems concerned about ESG getting in the way of the best possible return for investors; Shah worries that ESG is getting in the way of a war effort because of a blind adherence to its principles. Both seem to agree ESG is a distraction.

Not everyone agrees the ESG landscape is so simple. According to Leon Kamhi, head of responsibility at fund manager Federated Hermes, investment around some industries, for example weapons is more nuanced.

“Simplistically,” says Kamhi, “there are two types of ESG investors. Firstly, the thematic investor who excludes certain activities on environmental, social or governance grounds based on their ethics. Many thematic investors have excluded defence companies for those reasons.

“The second type is the investor who credibly integrates ESG factors that are material to performance and risk in investment decision-making and engages with the company to improve their performance in relevant ESG and other performance factors.

“This type of ESG investor will not be underweight in defence companies but rather—if active—supporting the defence company to play an appropriate role in a country’s society and economy. Providing a country with a deterrence capability could well be that role.”

So, investors are still backing defence companies. Defence, particularly in the face of an invader, is easily defined as having a societal purpose and thus, an ESG candidate. Indeed, one investment adviser told Board Agenda defence investment accords with No. 16 in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which aims to ”promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.” The war in Ukraine serves as a brutal and tragic reminder of that fact.

Reporting and ratings

Perhaps the problem is not the ideas underlying ESG, but the way it is implemented. And that’s not just about boards making policy decisions inside their organisations. ESG standards are, in part, driven increasingly by regulators adopting or setting reporting standards, including the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

ESG is also subject to a superstructure of consultants, experts and index providers pushing companies along. (There may be as many 450 ESG indexes for fund managers to use in the construction of portfolios, according to some counts.)

This is a particular concern for Shah. His article points to what he describes as the “bloated industry of advisers, experts, lobbyists and PR firms” that have grown up around ESG: A “gormless snake eating its own tail”, he calls it.

Of course, the purpose of ESG is not ESG. But, perhaps, the mission has drifted. According to James Corah, head of sustainability at fund manager CCLA, it may be time for “taking stock”.

Corah’s belief is that this isn’t the time to move away from away from ESG but to see what’s fundamentally important in the concept. And what’s important is that ESG is an issue for all companies, not a process for fund managers to pick stocks that “just do good”.

That, Corah says, has forced fund managers to focus on “portfolio construction” which misses the point that the whole economy—all companies—should be thinking ESG. He uses Australian brush fires as an analogy. A fire extinguisher is a good thing to have, congratulations all round to whoever owns the fire extinguisher. But it doesn’t change the fact the country is burning.

‘This isn’t the moment for ESG to disappear’

In the same way, an ESG portfolio may look good, but if the climate is still collapsing in on itself, well, that portfolio looks a little redundant. Or, to put it another way, it look a little like escapism.

“The idea that you can build portfolios that focus just on companies that do good things is a Panglossian fantasy,” says Corah.

“We really have to take this moment to reassess what ESG is about and remember that, actually, it should be about connecting to the real world. And connecting with the real world means that we accept the world as it is, not as we want it to be.

“We realised that the whole purpose of ESG in the starting place was to make things better; to use the power of finance to improve the environment and the lives of our communities.

“When you begin to get back to that, this isn’t the moment for ESG to disappear. It’s actually the moment for ESG to step up and focus back on what makes the world a better place.”

And that’s where many investment advisers find themselves: using ESG, or responsible investment, as a means of pursuing long-term financial performance by allocating capital in a way that fits with evolving political, social and legal expectations. As one adviser told Board Agenda: “In the final analysis, responsible investment—with its E, S and G pillars—may be a fancy name for good business sense that is focused on the long-term, measures its externalities and is transparent about its impacts on all stakeholders, not just shareholders.”

ESG need not exclude investment in defence industries. Nor should it exclude investment in traditional energy companies if those companies are on a road to transition from fossil fuels to more sustainable forms.

If the cost of saving the planet, and improving the lives of the disadvantaged, is a “bloated” industry of advisers, or reflection on the purpose of a condiment, then that seems a small price to pay for shifting mindsets wholesale. We might be doing ourselves a disservice if we confuse content with form.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Directors need to ‘up their game’ on ESG strategy
    April 4, 2022
    Board members looking at corporate reports

    Study says 70% of board directors say they are “not at all” or only “moderately“ effective at integrating ESG concerns into company strategy.

  • Boards need dedicated ESG committees 'as part of company strategy'
    November 25, 2021
    Board members discussing ESG

    Report for the Institute of Directors says boards need to integrate ESG into strategy and operations as a response to climate concerns.

  • Companies 'may inflate ESG performance' to boost ratings
    June 17, 2022
    Green stock market graph

    Researchers say firms may exaggerate their ESG performance over fears that investors will divest from their stock.

  • ESG communications: What boards need to know
    July 28, 2022
    ESG communications

    Here are some tangible steps to take that can help connect ESG to corporate purpose and long-term value creation.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

defence, ESG, ESG ratings, fossil fuel, investors, strategy, sustainability, Sustainable finance

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Dual class shares have become ‘dual class stock lite’

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|