Skip to content

1 October, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • auckland calling

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Auckland calling auditors; why ESG ratings matter; Victoria carpets’ ‘qualified’ audit; ethics and oligarchs; US...

    • pwc australia Review reveals leadership failure at PwC Australia

      Investigation into confidentiality leak finds ‘excessive’ power at the top and says poor decisions added...

    • board control Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • reporting requirements Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • ciia risk in focus

      Risk in Focus 2024: Hot topics for internal auditors

      Risk in Focus 2024 surveyed chief audit executives on their key challenges: geopolitical uncertainty and cybersecurity...

    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Workforce voice in corporate governance: where are we now?

by Janet Williamson on June 25, 2021

FRC research into implementation of requirements on workforce engagement shows that progress has been patchy.

Workers in overalls and helmets

Image: Kichigin/Shutterstock.com

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has just published research into how companies have implemented the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code on workforce engagement.

To recap: the 2018 code included for the first time a principle stipulating that “for the company to meet its responsibilities to shareholders and stakeholders, the board should ensure effective engagement with, and encourage participation from, these parties”.

And for engagement with the workforce, the code says that one or a combination of three methods should be used: a director appointed from the workforce; a formal workforce advisory panel; or a designated non-executive director.

Overall, the results make for disappointing reading. On the other hand, the report’s analysis should—if companies take notice— help to assuage concerns about worker directors, which have clearly worked well in the few instances where they are in place. And there are plenty of pointers about how to improve going forwards.

Workforce engagement still has a long way to go

Perhaps the most shocking finding is that very few companies consulted their workforce over how to implement the code’s requirements on workforce engagement. The exceptions to this were companies that already had good established mechanisms for staff dialogue and for whom it was therefore natural to use those trusted channels to discuss this development.

This depressing finding illustrates the importance of understanding the purpose and indeed the full meaning of workforce engagement—and for many companies there is clearly a long way to go.

There has also been a lack of workforce input into the selection of workforce advisory panel members and worker directors, and changing this is one of the recommendations of the report.

A designated NED is the least effective choice

We already knew that designating an existing non-executive director (NED) has been the most common approach taken by companies to comply with the code. The TUC has been critical of this approach, arguing that if the code aims to ensure that boards include a workforce perspective in decision-making, this is best done with the input of the workforce themselves through worker directors.

Many companies have gone down the NED route as that most aligned to the status quo and the easiest to carry out. Given this, it is not surprising that is has been the least effective in practice

While the report tries—perhaps a little too hard, given its own findings—to be even-handed about the approaches, it also makes clear that in practice a designated NED is the weakest of the three options: the report says that “in broad terms, most of the weakest and least substantive practices were those relying solely on NEDs, or on underdeveloped ‘alternative arrangements'”.

It says it is unclear why particular individuals were chosen, noting that few had any relevant experience, and that many companies are “brief or vague” about the activities NEDs are undertaking, noting that it is “not uncommon” for the NED to function as a “vestigial limb”, cut off from other workforce engagement practices. It seems from this that many companies have gone down the NED route as that most aligned to the status quo and the easiest to carry out. Given this, it is not surprising that is has been the least effective in practice.

Worker directors are rare, but work well

There are now five FTSE 350 companies with worker directors, up from just one before Theresa May made her 2016 speech saying “if I’m Prime Minister, we’re going to… have not just consumers represented on company boards, but employees as well”. So still a low number but a substantial increase.

It is clear that companies with worker directors have found they bring valuable insight and experience to the board

While the sample is small, it is clear that companies with worker directors have found they bring valuable insight and experience to the board. The report probes why more companies have not adopted this approach and suggests that boards may underestimate the ability of workforce representative to speak for a wider group of workers and take the interests of the wider company into account.

As it points out “where boards have been willing to trust worker directors or advisory panels with confidential information, or involve them in serious discussion of important issues, that trust has generally been repaid many times over.”

Conclusions

While the code has certainly brought about some improvements in how boards engage with their workforce, there is still a long way to go. Too few companies have trusted their workforce to speak for themselves in the boardroom. And there is too much variation, with a tendency for companies already committed to workforce engagement to take the code more seriously than those with a weak record on workforce engagement.

A notable gap in the report is any examination of the impact of the workforce engagement strategies from the perspective of the workforce

Unfortunately, the menu of options and the comply and explain nature of the requirement make this patchy response inevitable. Comply and explain codes can work well when there a high degree of consensus about a proposal, and a case for flexibility about how and when it is implemented. For workforce engagement, these conditions are not met.

The current state of workforce engagement within companies and the degree of consensus on its purpose and significance are too weak for a comply and explain approach with no enforcement mechanism to work effectively as a means of bringing about change. The TUC will continue to argue for a regulatory requirement that worker directors elected by the workforce should comprise one third of the board at all companies with 250 or more staff.

Ironically, a notable gap in the report (presumably reflecting its remit) is any examination of the impact of the workforce engagement strategies from the perspective of the workforce. This limits the conclusions that can be drawn about the real impact of the changes to date.

Linked to this last point, whatever form of workforce voice in corporate governance is used, this is not a substitute for collective bargaining with trade unions who directly represent their members’ interests. Worker directors are there to bring a workforce perspective to decision-making and being part of the board means that they can feed into discussions and decisions at their inception. Union representatives are there to directly represent the views and interests of the workforce in negotiations and discussions with management. The two roles complement, and do not replace, each other.

Janet Williamson is senior policy officer (rights, international, social and economics) at the Trades Union Congress (TUC).

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • Are UK corporate governance rules leading to market malaise?
    January 14, 2022
    Share listings board

    A recent article argued the UK needs "more directors who understand risk-taking, not virtue signalling" if London is to regain its status.

  • In extreme times, we need new priorities for corporate governance
    September 29, 2021
    People meeting in front of a green cityscape

    Corporate governance that prioritises shareholder profit maximisation is no longer adequate in light of the challenges that society faces.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    January 28, 2022

    Aviva issues climate warning; FRC seeks stakeholder insights; Unilever fights back; AI reporting needs improvement; and UK firms lead on ESG.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, employees, employees on boards, Financial Reporting Council, Janet Williamson, TUC, UK Corporate Governance Code, workforce engagement

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Labour commits to audit reform legislation
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Are boards losing control?
  • Boards on their ESG journey still have some way to go
  • BDO now biggest auditor in the UK by number of listed clients

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|