Skip to content

31 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • annual reports longer

      Annual reports reach ‘door-stopper’ size, says campaign group

      The Quoted Companies Alliance puts the average length of a FTSE 100 board report at...

    • stakeholder governance Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Workforce voice in corporate governance: where are we now?

by Janet Williamson on June 25, 2021

FRC research into implementation of requirements on workforce engagement shows that progress has been patchy.

Workers in overalls and helmets

Image: Kichigin/Shutterstock.com

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has just published research into how companies have implemented the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code on workforce engagement.

To recap: the 2018 code included for the first time a principle stipulating that “for the company to meet its responsibilities to shareholders and stakeholders, the board should ensure effective engagement with, and encourage participation from, these parties”.

And for engagement with the workforce, the code says that one or a combination of three methods should be used: a director appointed from the workforce; a formal workforce advisory panel; or a designated non-executive director.

Overall, the results make for disappointing reading. On the other hand, the report’s analysis should—if companies take notice— help to assuage concerns about worker directors, which have clearly worked well in the few instances where they are in place. And there are plenty of pointers about how to improve going forwards.

Workforce engagement still has a long way to go

Perhaps the most shocking finding is that very few companies consulted their workforce over how to implement the code’s requirements on workforce engagement. The exceptions to this were companies that already had good established mechanisms for staff dialogue and for whom it was therefore natural to use those trusted channels to discuss this development.

This depressing finding illustrates the importance of understanding the purpose and indeed the full meaning of workforce engagement—and for many companies there is clearly a long way to go.

There has also been a lack of workforce input into the selection of workforce advisory panel members and worker directors, and changing this is one of the recommendations of the report.

A designated NED is the least effective choice

We already knew that designating an existing non-executive director (NED) has been the most common approach taken by companies to comply with the code. The TUC has been critical of this approach, arguing that if the code aims to ensure that boards include a workforce perspective in decision-making, this is best done with the input of the workforce themselves through worker directors.

Many companies have gone down the NED route as that most aligned to the status quo and the easiest to carry out. Given this, it is not surprising that is has been the least effective in practice

While the report tries—perhaps a little too hard, given its own findings—to be even-handed about the approaches, it also makes clear that in practice a designated NED is the weakest of the three options: the report says that “in broad terms, most of the weakest and least substantive practices were those relying solely on NEDs, or on underdeveloped ‘alternative arrangements'”.

It says it is unclear why particular individuals were chosen, noting that few had any relevant experience, and that many companies are “brief or vague” about the activities NEDs are undertaking, noting that it is “not uncommon” for the NED to function as a “vestigial limb”, cut off from other workforce engagement practices. It seems from this that many companies have gone down the NED route as that most aligned to the status quo and the easiest to carry out. Given this, it is not surprising that is has been the least effective in practice.

Worker directors are rare, but work well

There are now five FTSE 350 companies with worker directors, up from just one before Theresa May made her 2016 speech saying “if I’m Prime Minister, we’re going to… have not just consumers represented on company boards, but employees as well”. So still a low number but a substantial increase.

It is clear that companies with worker directors have found they bring valuable insight and experience to the board

While the sample is small, it is clear that companies with worker directors have found they bring valuable insight and experience to the board. The report probes why more companies have not adopted this approach and suggests that boards may underestimate the ability of workforce representative to speak for a wider group of workers and take the interests of the wider company into account.

As it points out “where boards have been willing to trust worker directors or advisory panels with confidential information, or involve them in serious discussion of important issues, that trust has generally been repaid many times over.”

Conclusions

While the code has certainly brought about some improvements in how boards engage with their workforce, there is still a long way to go. Too few companies have trusted their workforce to speak for themselves in the boardroom. And there is too much variation, with a tendency for companies already committed to workforce engagement to take the code more seriously than those with a weak record on workforce engagement.

A notable gap in the report is any examination of the impact of the workforce engagement strategies from the perspective of the workforce

Unfortunately, the menu of options and the comply and explain nature of the requirement make this patchy response inevitable. Comply and explain codes can work well when there a high degree of consensus about a proposal, and a case for flexibility about how and when it is implemented. For workforce engagement, these conditions are not met.

The current state of workforce engagement within companies and the degree of consensus on its purpose and significance are too weak for a comply and explain approach with no enforcement mechanism to work effectively as a means of bringing about change. The TUC will continue to argue for a regulatory requirement that worker directors elected by the workforce should comprise one third of the board at all companies with 250 or more staff.

Ironically, a notable gap in the report (presumably reflecting its remit) is any examination of the impact of the workforce engagement strategies from the perspective of the workforce. This limits the conclusions that can be drawn about the real impact of the changes to date.

Linked to this last point, whatever form of workforce voice in corporate governance is used, this is not a substitute for collective bargaining with trade unions who directly represent their members’ interests. Worker directors are there to bring a workforce perspective to decision-making and being part of the board means that they can feed into discussions and decisions at their inception. Union representatives are there to directly represent the views and interests of the workforce in negotiations and discussions with management. The two roles complement, and do not replace, each other.

Janet Williamson is senior policy officer (rights, international, social and economics) at the Trades Union Congress (TUC).

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • Are UK corporate governance rules leading to market malaise?
    January 14, 2022
    Share listings board

    A recent article argued the UK needs "more directors who understand risk-taking, not virtue signalling" if London is to regain its status.

  • In extreme times, we need new priorities for corporate governance
    September 29, 2021
    People meeting in front of a green cityscape

    Corporate governance that prioritises shareholder profit maximisation is no longer adequate in light of the challenges that society faces.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    January 28, 2022

    Aviva issues climate warning; FRC seeks stakeholder insights; Unilever fights back; AI reporting needs improvement; and UK firms lead on ESG.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, employees, employees on boards, Financial Reporting Council, Janet Williamson, TUC, UK Corporate Governance Code, workforce engagement

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|