Skip to content

2 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Succession planning

      News round-up: this week in governance

      UK 'less optimistic' on ESG than European boards; holding stock; ethics codes; governance in Japan;...

    • C-suite barometer Leaders are positive about growth despite economic uncertainty

      Sustainability and technology are strategic priorities for boards in 2023, Mazars’ annual barometer of the...

    • EU CSDDD Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules

      More companies have added their voices to the call to make the EU Corporate Sustainability...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

The ICGN Global Stewardship Principles: 2020 revisions

by George Dallas

The updated ICGN GSP reflect shifts in market practice and regulation, as well as evolving attitudes towards stewardship.

Global stewardship

Image: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock

The International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) celebrates its 25th anniversary this year, normally a time for great celebration, which had been planned for this year’s annual general meeting in Toronto. Covid-19 sadly derailed those plans as part of its broad wave of disruption. So while our ICGN conference remains on the agenda for 2021, the AGM took place this year virtually—like many other AGMs around the world.

A key item on the agenda was the revision of ICGNs Global Stewardship Principles (GSP), which were first published in 2016, as other stewardship codes were coming into place in markets around the world. The purpose of the GSP is to reinforce a core ICGN policy priority of making successful stewardship a reality. This is both an aspirational goal and a journey. But it is a journey that many in the investment community have embarked upon, and progress is being made— even if not all investors are at the same stage along this journey.

A global stewardship credential

ICGN’s GSP were developed to provide an international standard of reference for investors, regulators and standard setters with regard to investor stewardship. The GSP are also used by some institutional investors with global holdings as an international “passport” to present a global stewardship credential in markets where they may not be a signatory to a local stewardship code.

As of July 2020, 48 of ICGN’s investor members, representing US$17trn in assets under management, have formally endorsed ICGN’s GSP. The GSP have also been used by regulators in many markets as a global benchmark as they develop or update their own stewardship codes.

The ICGN GSP consist of seven principles:

  1.  Internal governance: foundations of effective stewardship
  2. Developing and implementing stewardship policies
  3. Monitoring and assessing investee companies
  4. Engaging companies and investor collaboration
  5. Exercising voting rights
  6. Promoting long-term value creation and integration of ESG
  7. Enhancing transparency, disclosure and reporting.

Like stewardship codes that have developed in individual markets, the ICGN GSP emphasise many basic elements of the stewardship process, such as monitoring, engaging, voting and client reporting. But relative to other codes ICGN’s GSP is differentiated by starting with the internal governance of the investment firm itself as the first principle of stewardship.

The GSP have been used by regulators in many markets as a global benchmark

The other distinguishing feature of ICGN’s GSP relative to many other stewardship codes (at least at the time) was its inclusion of ESG integration as a core principle. This reflects both economics and ethics.

ESG integration builds awareness of what an investee company’s interface is with its stakeholders and society more generally. They are fundamental drivers of long-term risk and opportunity for companies, economies and markets and are critical considerations for sustainable value creation.

Revisions to the ICGN GSP

The project to revise the GSP for the first time since their 2016 launch began in 2019 with an internal review and feedback from ICGN’s Board and Shareholder Responsibilities Committee, followed by a membership consultation. The revised GSP were ratified by ICGN members at its 2020 AGM.

Stewardship will continue to evolve and mature and the GSP will also remain a work in process

While ICGN believes the 2016 principles were robust and fit for purpose, it made a number of specific changes or additions to reflect shifts in market practice and regulation and ongoing thinking about stewardship. The main changes in the 2020 GSP include:

  • More emphasis on fiduciary duty and the “soft”, but real, issues of culture and values by institutional investors. Good stewardship requires not only policies and processes, but it is essential that investors embrace its underlying principles and adapt these within their organisations.
  • An explicit link between fiduciary duty and long-term value creation, which is in turn directly linked to sustainable benefits for the economy, environment and society.
  • The use of ESG factors in investment decision-making, as well as stewardship. ESG factors are clearly linked to long-term company performance and should be considered not only in the context of engagement and voting, but also in investment decisions relating to valuation and the buying or selling of financial assets.
  • Greater focus on systemic risks relevant to institutional investors. It is important for investors to recognise that systemic risks, including those relating to pandemics, climate change, wealth inequality and corruption, can affect the sustainable value creation of individual companies as well as the health of economies and financial markets.
  • More emphasis on the application of stewardship to asset classes beyond listed equities. Institutional investors invest in a wide range of assets on behalf of their beneficiaries, including corporate and public sector debt, private equity, real estate and infrastructure.
  • Identifying capital allocation as an important topic for engagement for both creditors and shareholders. Creditors generally seek a stable and predictable credit risk profile and shareholders have a focus on upside potential and risk adjusted returns on capital. Capital allocation seeks to achieve a sustainable equilibrium between these potential tensions.
  • Protecting voting rights against dual class shares and other forms of differential ownership which have the practical effect of marginalising stewardship and the accountability of companies to minority shareholders by diluting their voting rights.
  • Encouraging investors to disclose more information about stewardship activities and outcomes. Stewardship has the greatest meaning when it is directly relates to practical outcomes, and not just a policy framework.

As ICGN begins its next 25 years, stewardship will continue to evolve and mature and the GSP will also remain a work in process. But we believe we have made progress with this latest set of revisions and look forward to continuing the journey.

George Dallas is policy director at the International Corporate Governance Network.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Ann-marie Murphy joins The Gym Group board
    April 22, 2022
    The Gym Group logo

    Murphy joined the company in April 2018 as director of people and development, and became chief operating officer earlier this year.

  • Companies must put equality at the heart of the race to zero
    November 10, 2021
    Trees reflected in buildings

    Singular pursuit of net-zero by 2050 could exacerbate inequality and derail our chances of a climate-resilient future.

  • The storm before the calm: how boards can make better decisions
    October 18, 2021
    Businessman looking at stormy sky

    Behind every apparently calm surface lies a mass of board member interests, beliefs and emotions. How these conflicts can be managed?

  • 'The most important topic we discuss is the safety of our people'
    March 4, 2022
    Ukraine energy company DTEK logo

    Ukrainian firms are facing huge operational challenges, as well as responsibilities to their employees and the economy of their country.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

ESG, George Dallas, ICGN, ICGN Global Stewardship Principles, investors, stewardship, sustainability

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|