Skip to content

23 September, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Lonely leadership; how governance helps in a crisis; Kerrie Waring to depart ICGN; ESG and...

    • say-on-pay votes Say-on-pay votes lack link to sustainability

      Very few investors use their AGM votes on executive pay as a spur to improve...

    • fast-moving threats ‘Fast-moving threats’ will soon challenge boards, warns CIIA

      Resilience will be required to face a ‘poly-crisis’ of immediate and simultaneous risk issues, internal...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • trust matters Ignore trust at your peril

      Consumers and employers expect ethical corporate behaviour—and will vote with their feet when trust is...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

    • IoD Are boards losing control report cover

      Are Boards Losing Control? 2023

      This IoD Centre for Corporate Governance report looks at the biggest challenges facing companies over...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Twitter CEO takes on Trump over tweets that ‘violate company rules’

by Gavin Hinks

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s decision to fact-check and flag the president’s more egregious tweets is a stark reminder that corporate reputation is a governance issue.

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Image: Frederic Legrand COMEO/Shutterstock

Last week news outlets were filled by stories of Twitter’s clash with Donald Trump over the president’s tweets. While somewhat overtaken by recent events, the collision highlights how corporate leaders have felt compelled to step in to the political arena to both defend corporate reputation and, as commentators often observe, fill the void left by political actors.

The conflict began with Twitter’s decision to add warning labels to three of President Trump’s tweets. The first two, on 26 May, involved adding a “fact checking” warning to claims made by the president that postal ballots would lead to voter fraud. The next involved a declaration attached to the now notorious Trump tweet in which he proclaimed that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts”. Twitter’s label said the president’s message “violated” the social media site’s rules about “glorifying violence”.

Trump was furious and responded with an executive order “cracking down” on social media sites with amendments to a key piece of US legislation, section 230, the law which absolves platforms of liability for the content users post.

That it is an urgent governance issue is underpinned by the capital structure of Twitter compared with Facebook

The amendments will affect other sites too, including Facebook, whose founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has argued fervently that it should not be the role of platforms to censor users.

The episode leaves Twitter in a compelling face-off with the president and a demanding corporate governance issue for its chief executive Jack Dorsey—and his board—to handle.

That it is an urgent governance issue is underpinned by the capital structure of Twitter compared with Facebook. As corporate governance expert Professor Richard Leblanc points out, Facebook has a dual-class share structure giving Zuckerberg enormous power. Twitter does not, making Dorsey more accountable to his board.

But the intervention also places Dorsey in the realm of “activist CEO”—a company leader making a stand on political or social issues.

CEO activism on the rise

The US has seen much of this in recent years as elected leaders remained silent or swung away from core political concerns. “As the global challenges keep piling up, CEOs are becoming the bullhorns of democracy,” wrote US academics Caroline Kaeb and David Scheffer in June last year.

Examples are numerous. Following school shootings in 2018, many retailers took guns off their shelves and distanced themselves from the National Rifle Association (NRA). Following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, chief executives from all over the world boycotted a conference in Saudi Arabia billed as the “Davos in the desert”. May last year saw the leaders of 13 US companies help found the CEO Climate Dialogue as part of an effort to shift government policy on the environment.

While most activist CEOs make moves on issues somewhat removed from their company operations, Twitter’s intervention was about the way its own services are used

Netflix became the first company to join legal advocacy groups in challenging the state of Georgia’s efforts to curtail female reproductive freedoms. Elsewhere, Nike famously featured the football player Colin Kaepernick in an advertising campaign. Kaepernick had outraged some in the US with his refusal to stand for the national anthem in protest at police brutality against African-Americans.

Trump tweet flagged by Twitter
Twitter’s Trump warning.

These are all conscious decisions. While moves such as these are risky, they can pay off. Despite provoking a backlash, the “buzz” surrounding Nike and Kaepernick was estimated to be worth $163m in marketing value. Though, marketing benefits are not the only reason. Companies are allowed to do the right thing, not least because their employees and customers will reflect the diversity within society.

It may help that despite corporate scandals and the financial crisis of 2008, trust in politicians is lower than it is in company leaders. The 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer found that while 51% of those polled for the survey trusted CEOs, only 42% trusted heads of government. A huge 87% said stakeholders were more important than shareholders to long-term company success while 92% of employees believe it is important for CEOs to speak out on social issues.

However, it is worth noting that Twitter’s situation is different in quality to the CEOs in many of the examples cited here. What makes Dorsey’s position so unique is that while most activist CEOs make moves on issues somewhat removed from their company operations, Twitter’s intervention was about the way its own services are used.

In short, the company’s reputation was at stake. A CEO and a board cannot ignore that indefinitely.

“Twitter is a teachable moment for board discussions with management on pushing back when politicians take steps that harm the reputation and goodwill of the company,” says governance expert Leblanc.

Twitter’s action may well prompt other CEOs to take similar stands, especially when political actors play fast and loose with the truth. “A company CEO would never have the unlimited speech that bad political actors have. There should be greater accountability for political speech,” adds Leblanc.

Social media law

Mark Zuckerberg now has his own leadership concerns after staff and civil rights leaders chose to protest against his refusal to follow Twitter’s lead. Whether there is enough momentum to force a change of heart remains to be seen.

The law is not enough for boards in social media firms to steer a clear path through the complex questions raised

But the fact that Facebook and Twitter are at odds over an issue so critical to the functioning of contemporary society means Section 230 probably needs be reformed, according to Leblanc. As it stands the law is not enough to help boards in social media firms to steer a clear path through the complex questions raised by freedom of speech, fake news and the needs of a functioning society in general.

Outside social media, other corporate leaders will be watching what happens. Twitter’s example may give them courage to chart their own course into activism.

In the end, the way social media companies respond to content may come down to governance structures, as mentioned earlier. Carum Basra, a policy adviser at the Institute of Directors, says: “Ultimately, for many of these entities it will be for their boards to determine where to draw the line in terms of what is acceptable.

“However, some of these firms have governance structures that concentrate power in the hands of one or two individuals; more boardroom challenge might be what is needed.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • TUC urges change to company law that prioritises shareholders
    January 10, 2022
    Frances O'Grady, general secretary of the TUC

    New report says the balance of company interests has swung too far towards shareholders and “away from working people who create the wealth”.

  • Company credit ratings 'negatively associated with CEO narcissism'
    May 18, 2022
    Businessman in tailored suit

    Research suggests credit rating agencies perceive companies led by narcissistic chief executives as riskier propositions.

  • Xerox appoints CEO
    August 19, 2022
    Xerox CEO

    Steven Bandrowczak has been confirmed in post after stepping up as interim chief executive officer since June this year.

  • Unilever CEO defends company's focus on sustainability
    May 25, 2022
    Unilever logo

    Alan Jope tells Davos that consumer habits, costs and recruitment mean that Unilever has to put ESG 'at the heart of our business model'.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

CEO activism, corporate reputation, Donald Trump, Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, reputational risk, social media, Twitter

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures
  • G20 backs OECD corporate governance principles
  • Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • ‘Fast-moving threats’ will soon challenge boards, warns CIIA

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|