Skip to content

15 May, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs

      Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • AI will transform

      4 ways AI will transform board dynamics

      Opportunities and challenges are arising from the integration of artificial intelligence into corporate governance.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • meritocracy Fairness makes for meritocracy

      Favouring actions over persuasion, boards can take small yet extremely effective steps to improve diversity,...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

    • EU non-financial reporting reforms are an ‘opportunity’

      Firms can take advantage of the delayed implementation of CSRD and CSDDD to take stock...

  • Career
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board & Governance Services
    • Director Reference Guide: Fostering the board-CEO relationship

      This Board Agenda Director Reference Guide on fostering the board-CEO relationship provides practical advice to...

    • Forvis Mazars AI 2025

      Performance Pulse: Are UK businesses prepared for AI?

      Forvis Mazars measured the AI preparedness of more than 300 UK businesses: 97% say they're...

    • Parker review cover

      Improving the Ethnic Diversity of UK Business, Parker Review update 2025

      The 2025 Parker Review update report, supported by EY. Over the past year, significant progress...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Why insecure leaders trust algorithms over advisers

by Gavin Hinks on August 15, 2019

Psychological experiments suggest that secure leaders are more likely to seek counsel from peers, while insecure bosses prefer to ask an algorithm. What are the implications for leadership?

AI, artificial intelligence

Image: Jirsak/Shutterstock

Boards are not just made to hold management to account; they’re also there to provide advice. Except, it seems, some leaders might prefer the counsel of machines rather than real people.

That’s the view one could conclude from an interesting piece of research conducted at the BI Norwegian Business School investigating the attitude of leaders to advice from others.

Psychology researcher Ingvild Müller Seljeseth undertook three experiments involving more than 500 business students asking them to answer questions as leaders would.

In the main study the students were asked to do two things: estimate the numbers of peas in a jar, and forecast price developments on the stock market.

“Insecure leaders are more willing to accept advice from the data algorithm as machines are not perceived as competing with them, unlike a human being”

—Ingvild Müller Seljeseth, BI Norwegian Business School

When looking at the jar of peas, researchers found those students in a “stable” position—i.e., unlikely to lose their jobs—were more likely to take the advice of previous participants in the experiment.

When looking at stock prices, “unstable” subjects—those at risk of losing their jobs—were more likely to take the advice of a computer algorithm rather than turn to the expertise of previous participants in the exercise.

Seljeseth believes this may have significant implications for leadership: leaders insecure about their futures become trapped into rigid thinking, she concludes.

“They also feel at risk of being perceived as incapable or indecisive if they take advice from someone else,” says Seljeseth. “However, these insecure leaders are more willing to accept advice from the data algorithm as machines are not perceived as competing with them, unlike a human being,” she says.

Challenge and debate

In the age of big data and artificial intelligence, that may seem like the thing to do. Aren’t machines better at thinking? Seljeseth thinks not. “The big concern is that, as leaders have to constantly make decisions that are in the best interest of their organisations, better decisions are made by leaders who are open to advice and suggestions from others.”

Seljeseth even tested whether the source of the advice made any difference. When advice came from a “prominent” human expert stable leaders listened, while those in a “threatened” position remained reluctant to follow it.

Leadership expert Kieran Moynihan, managing partner at advisers Board Excellence, says the research tallies with some of his experience with boards on the thorny topic of whether they can formulate a “genuine partnership” where chief executives feel “very comfortable in balancing very high-quality challenge, debate and oversight from the non-executive directors,” as they offer “high value guidance and support at critical phases”.

“The machine is not reflecting back the weaknesses and insecurities that the CEO feels when they look across the board table at a non-executive who is challenging their performance and decision-making”

—Kieran Moynihan, Board Excellence

Insecurities, he says, are problematic. “The idea of getting guidance from a machine is a lot more appealing as the machine is not reflecting back the weaknesses and insecurities that the CEO feels when they look across the board table at a non-executive who is engaging with them and in some cases seriously challenging their performance and decision-making.” The risk, Moynihan says, is that the chief executive retreats into a “bunker mentality”.

And the problem may be widespread. According to Sabine Dembkowski, managing partner at Better Boards, an advisory firm, developments in technology, current geopolitical risks and economic uncertainty all combine to create an environment in which “hardly any position is safe”.

It should be borne in mind that Seljeseth’s PHD is entitled The Inevitable Thucydides Trap? How Hierarchical Instability and Threat Influences Leaders’ Openness to Inputs from Others. The “trap” referred to here is the idea that when a rising power causes insecurity in another power, it results in war. Grim stuff, but with a parallel in business as change creates insecurity. Indeed, insecurity may be a sign of the times, in business, as much as anywhere else.

Dembkowski believes business leaders can fall into the trap of thinking “people issues” take up too much of their time and that consulting with peers is part of their problem, though more research might be needed to identify if this is true across a range of age groups, or more accurate for younger executives. “I would not be surprised if we see a difference,” says Dembkowski.

Most of all, however, Dembkowski points to the need for boardrooms to be places of “trust”. Top decision-making bodies need to be “safe places to be”.

“The importance of psychological safety in boardrooms and executive committees cannot be overstated,” she says. The best leaders, Dembkowski adds, use a “balanced approach” utilising both algorithms as well as advice from trusted human experts. But she also wonders how the mindset of business leaders can be changed at an earlier stage of their careers. After all, the students involved in the study appeared already caught in bunker thinking.

“It begs the question of what has to be changed in the curricula of business courses to create a different mindset.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Is there a Machiavellian CEO in your boardroom?
    June 7, 2022

    While being Machiavellian is generally seen as a negative characteristic, a study shows that it can offer important advantages for leaders.

  • How to be an effective chair during volatile times
    July 18, 2022

    Now, more than ever, boards need to be on top of their game to make the right decisions and drive growth—effective chairing is the key.

  • Facebook owner Meta names Tony Xu as board director
    January 18, 2022
    Meta logo and Facebook logo

    Xu is co-founder, chief executive officer and chair of DoorDash, the leading online food delivery company in the US.

  • Nick Bate named as chair of Redcentric board
    November 23, 2021
    Data on a screen

    Bate, a chartered management accountant with a background in corporate M&A transactions, takes over from Ian Johnson.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

artificial intelligence, board effectiveness, board oversight, CEOs, leadership, machine learning, psychology

Search


Follow Us

Boardroom Intelligence

Stay in the know and register for free to receive our essential Boardroom Intelligence Briefing featuring:

  • Top governance headlines, expert opinion & boardroom insights, exclusive whitepapers & strategy guides, delivered to your inbox every week – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

By registering you will be able to access one premium article each month, selected partner newsletters and content, plus updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board & Governance Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap