Skip to content

10 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Unilever chair

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Unilever seeks new chair; corporate purpose statements; unreadable annual reports; and helping the FRC on...

    • ESG strategy UK boards struggle to embed ESG in strategy

      Most recognise the importance of sustainability, but face challenges in translating ESG aims into strategy...

    • climate change litigation Growing climate litigation is ‘absolutely necessary’

      UN expert Ian Fry says court cases are needed to legally hold ‘to account’ those...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • audit committee

      Audit committees give investors a new perspective

      Investors who quiz the audit committee get a more rounded – albeit sometimes less comfortable...

    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Leadership ESG

      Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

      We asked 100 chairs, chief executives, other C-suite executives and company secretaries of UK companies,...

    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • Edison Energy Disclosure to Decarbonization report

      Disclosure to Decarbonization: A Guide to Setting and Achieving Your Climate Goals

      Sustainability leaders are charged with marshalling and coordinating resources, expertise, and innovation for a prosperous,...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

When employees become the competition

by Hannah Netherton, Catherine Taylor and Aisleen Pugh

How might you be affected by a global move towards the banning of employment contract non-compete clauses?

non-compete clause

Image: fizkes/Shutterstock.com

Recent developments in the US, as well as potential changes mooted in the UK, may fundamentally alter the way that organisations can impose contractual restrictions on those who hold valuable confidential information and influence.

Certain US states have limited the use of non-compete restrictions on workers on the basis that they stifle innovation. However, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently announced a proposed rule to ban non-compete clauses between employers and workers at a federal level.

The proposed rule would make it illegal across the US for an employer to:

• enter into or attempt to enter into a non-compete clause with a worker;
• maintain an existing non-compete clause with a worker; or
• represent to a worker, under certain circumstances, that the worker is subject to a non-compete clause.

The risks for businesses have perhaps never been greater, especially in today’s hybrid working world

There are some limited exceptions: non-compete clauses between a buyer and seller of a business, where the restricted person holds a minimum 25% shareholding in the business, would not be prohibited.

In justifying the policy change, the FTC commented that less onerous alternatives to non-compete clauses, in particular non-disclosure agreements, provide adequate protection to businesses.

It is notable that the position in the US is being driven by the FTC as its anti-trust regulator, indicating that this matter is seen as a broader unfair trading issue, rather than just a matter of what is fair or reasonable to impose on an individual. Similar commentary is now being seen from the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority, as well as its European counterparts, on unfair competition practices when recruiting and retaining talent. Employers should keep a close eye on these regulatory developments.

Will it happen here?

In the past few years, there has been talk of change to the current UK legal regime on non-compete restrictions imposed on individuals. The government launched a consultation in December 2020 on measures to reform post-termination non-compete clauses in employment contracts.

The consultation, which closed in February 2021, sought views on two main options for reform:

1. making post-termination non-compete clauses enforceable only when an employer provides compensation during the term of the clause, and
2. introducing an outright ban on non-compete clauses (akin to the FTC’s approach).

A number of interested parties, including the Employment Lawyers Association, responded to the consultation, flagging the lack of clear evidence that such changes would achieve the stated policy aims and also that legislative reform in this area would cause enormous upheaval to the current common law legal regime.

We consider that the most likely route for reform is that an employer must compensate the employee during the restricted period.

The outcome of the consultation is awaited, although a minister confirmed on behalf of BEIS that the government was in the process of analysing responses to the consultation and that a response would be published “in due course”.

For now, employers can continue to include post-termination non-compete covenants in their employment contracts. These remain a useful and legitimate business protection measure.

We consider that the most likely route for reform is that an employer must compensate the employee during the restricted period. This would align with the approach in other European jurisdictions where the payment of compensation is a prerequisite for enforceability.

There is, however, little point in UK employers taking formal steps to adopt such an approach within their businesses at this stage because any changes will be a long way off.

In addition, the payment of compensation is not a factor that the UK courts currently take into account in determining the enforceability of restrictive covenants under the existing common law regime. Payment mechanisms are being used in some sectors in the UK but can be unwieldy and add another arena for dispute. Garden leave is a more straightforward alternative.

What should businesses be considering at this point?

Despite the above, it remains the case under the current legal regime in the UK that many businesses either do not consider that the contractual restrictions often imposed on key stakeholders are effective or find that it can often be disproportionately time-consuming and costly to seek to enforce them. But the risks for businesses have perhaps never been greater, especially in today’s hybrid working world.

Where enforcement via litigation is not the preferred (or, perhaps, realistic) route, there are other measures that businesses can rely on to protect their legitimate interests.

For example:
• implementing enhanced information security arrangements such as employee monitoring (subject to compliance with data privacy obligations), access restrictions, prohibiting the use of personal email addresses, and system alerts in respect of unusual copying, printing or downloading activities;
• extending notice periods and making use of garden leave clauses instead of payments in lieu of notice;
• refreshing restrictions and other retention mechanisms as a matter of course on promotion or role change or location change.

There may be other causes of action available where a former employee sets up—or prepares to set up—in competition. For example, during the course of their employment, employees are subject to a duty of fidelity which includes an obligation not to compete with their employer.

Businesses should not forget the statutory protection afforded to their trade secrets under the Trade Secrets (Enforcement, etc) Regulations 2018, where an employer has taken “reasonable steps” to protect the information and can establish that that information is secret and has commercial value.

Business protection via litigation against (ex)employees and other stakeholders is sometimes unavoidable. However, with the legal landscape changing in the US and potentially also in the UK, the direction of travel in this area is becoming less favourable to employers. Businesses should consider what they can do to both mitigate the impact of these legal developments and shore up their internal business protection practices to prevent issues from arising in the first place.

Hannah Netherton and Catherine Taylor are partners in law firm CMS’s employment team and Aisleen Pugh is a professional support lawyer in the team.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Why risk perception is vital
    June 9, 2022

    It is easy to see the tragic situation unfolding in Ukraine in terms of a failure of risk perception by both Russia and the West.

  • Share schemes could make employees 'better off' during cost of living crisis
    October 26, 2022

    EQ's 2022 Shareholder Voice survey finds shareholders back support for employees as inflation soars, while interest in ESG grows.

  • How 'risk blindness' threatens the effectiveness of board decisions
    January 25, 2022
    Businesswoman on a cliff edge

    A board's highly sophisticated procedure for making risk decisions can often be undermined by a failure to identify risk in the first place.

  • Embrace data analytics to boost risk assessment, advises CIIA
    November 30, 2022
    risk data analytics

    Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors’ report cites a lack of skills, resources and time as organisational barriers to effective analysis.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Aisleen Pugh, BEIS, Catherine Taylor, CMS, competition, Competition and Markets Authority, contract of employment, data security, employment law, Employment Lawyers Association, ethics, Federal Trade Commission, Hannah Netherton, insight, Insights, intellectual property, law, legal, non-compete, Regulation, regulatory, risk, risk management, stakeholders, trade secrets, US

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • UK boards struggle to embed ESG in strategy
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to be an effective chair during volatile times
  • Audit committees give investors a new perspective
  • Top stories of 2022: corporate governance gets political

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|