Shareholder activism might sound good, but it won’t change much
Relying on shareholders to make corporations more accountable is misguided. There are far more direct and effective measures available.
Image: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock
In the wake of systemic corporate misconduct scandals such as those brought to light in the Australian Banking Royal Commission, and issues such as income inequality and climate change, there are growing public demands for increased corporate accountability and less emphasis on shareholder returns.
Corporate governance reform has become a hot button political issue and big business is feeling nervous. “Social licence to operate” and “trust” are now popular buzzwords in board land.
While company annual general meetings (AGMs) have long been the forum for individual vocal and activist shareholders to embarrass boards, large shareh
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
Want gender diversity on corporate boards? Try a diversity of tactics
Pushing a particular formula for getting more women onto boards is a surefire way to narrow the conversation and slow progress, argues Catherine Banat.
-
The promises and limitations of institutional investors
Policymakers believe that investment institutions can be persuaded to take a greater role in corporate governance. But do they really possess the willingness and capacity to embrace their stewardship role?
-
ESG ‘not a factor’ in share price resilience during Covid-19 crisis
Researchers found that firms' ESG ratings were also “significantly negatively associated with returns” in the Q2 recovery period.
