Skip to content

24 May, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • UK Corporate Governance Code

      Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • gender pay gap

      Act now to close the gender pay gap

      This month, it is 55 years since the Equal Pay Act, yet pay inequality persists....

    • monitor sustainability

      How to equip the auditco to monitor sustainability

      The board’s expanding remit to oversee non-financial reporting calls for significant reforms, with stakeholder trust...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • gender pay gap

      Act now to close the gender pay gap

      This month, it is 55 years since the Equal Pay Act, yet pay inequality persists....

    • leadership on AI How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • Route to the top 2025

      Route to the Top 2025

      Heidrick & Struggles’ report draws on an analysis of the profiles of the 1,232 CEOs...

    • Director Reference Guide: Fostering the board-CEO relationship

      This Board Agenda Director Reference Guide on fostering the board-CEO relationship provides practical advice to...

    • Forvis Mazars AI 2025

      Performance Pulse: Are UK businesses prepared for AI?

      Forvis Mazars measured the AI preparedness of more than 300 UK businesses: 97% say they're...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

BlackRock expands voting choice in response to investor demand

by Gavin Hinks on June 14, 2022

Voting will now be available to clients representing 47% of index equity assets globally, including 650 funds based in the US and UK.

BlackRock offices in San Francisco

Image: Tada Images/Shutterstock.com

As an exercise in corporate democracy it is impressive. BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, is expanding the “voting choice” measures that allow clients, such as pensions funds, to make their own decisions when it comes to voting at annual general meetings.

An announcement this week sees voting choice expanded to clients representing 47% of index equity assets globally, including 650 funds based in the US and UK. Funds valued at $530bn, or a quarter of eligible assets, have now shifted to their own voting, while half the assets ($4.7trn) managed by BlackRock are eligible to vote their own preferences.

Voting choice is available for 100% of US pension funds using BlackRock, and round 80% of assets managed in Europe and the UK.

According to Sandy Boss, global head of BlackRock investment stewardship, voting comes as a response to investor demand. “Our clients have a range of investment horizons, risk preferences and financial needs. We understand that some client are seeking increased customisation, including the opportunity to align their voting with their unique investment philosophies or their views.”

Current moves, however, which started in October 2021, may just be the start. Salim Ramji, global head of iShares and index investments at BlackRock, says: “While BlackRock’s Voting Choice program is an industry first, we see it as just a beginning. Our ambition is to make voting choice convenient and efficient for all investors, as we are working with policymakers and industry participants around the world to extend voting choice for our clients.”

Size and voting power

Voting choice, or preferences, has been a concern here in the UK too. Recommendation 20 of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) report on voting for pensions schemes calls on asset managers to allow pensions an “expression of wish”.

In December last year the DWP minister Guy Opperman wrote to 44 asset managers asking them to implement Recommendation 20. He said in a letter he saw “no reason why trustees should not be able to set an expression of wish if they want to do so”.

Fund managers, and in particular BlackRock, have faced complaints for some time about their sheer scale and voting power. When it was announced in October last year, the New York Times DealBook column wrote: “Allowing investors to vote their shares gives BlackRock some cover, especially when it comes to what has become its thorniest issue: its size. In recent years, BlackRock has been simultaneously criticized for having too much power and for not using it to push for more changes at companies in which it invests.”

But it wasn’t just size that mattered to some observers. Also of concern was the leadership of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink in pushing ESG measures. According to a piece on the Harvard Law School governance blog, his “outsize role” in ESG has made the fund manager a “a target for protests” from campaigners to push the organisation further.

That is unlikely to end soon. BlackRock wields too much power and many investors will continue to allow the fund manager to vote their shares. But the company can say it has played a part in allowing investors the chance to make their own voting decisions.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Good governance boosts companies' CSR performance
    July 5, 2021
    Board members looking at corporate reports

    Study concludes that “corporate board reforms... appear to have a positive spillover for non-financial stakeholders”.

  • ‘Poor’ proxy advisers ‘stifle’ investor stewardship
    November 7, 2022
    board proxy advisers

    Many chairs believe the focus on compliance has led to the board’s relationship with institutional investors deteriorating, report finds.

  • Stakeholder capitalism 'won't work'—but investors need to do more
    January 24, 2022
    shareholder vote, shareholder dissent

    London Business School/Investor Forum report backs the shareholder model, but urges investors to take responsibility for stakeholder issues.

  • Investors influence ESG performance, study reveals
    July 26, 2022
    Investors influence ESG

    Researchers find that, among the many drivers for improving ESG, intervention by corporate investors is key.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

AGMs, Blackrock, corporate governance, investors, strategy, Voting rights

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap