Skip to content

11 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

How the revised shareholder directive will help overcome short-termism

by Florence Bindelle and Aleksandra Palinska

The EU’s amended Shareholder Rights Directive came into force in June 2017, and will be rolled out across member states by 2019. It aims to tackle short-termism among investors. But what are the law’s key elements?

Short-termism, long-termism

Image: Shutterstock

On 9 June 2017, the EU directive 2017/282 on long-term shareholder engagement, also known as the revised Shareholder Rights Directive (SRD II), came into force. Most of the measures apply in all EU member states as of 10 June 2019. The remaining provisions, covered by European Commission regulation in September 2018, are to be implemented into local rules within 24 months.

SRD II provides a right for companies to identify their shareholders, and intermediaries are obliged to cooperate in this process.

The new rules were proposed to address investors’ short-termism and shortcomings in the corporate governance of listed companies, which were exposed by the financial crisis and created strong social and political criticism.

Among the hot topics were serious impediments to the exercise of shareholders’ rights; excessive short-term risk-taking by some investors and fund managers; and directors’ pay, which was perceived in some companies as excessive and not sufficiently justified by performance. The directive tries to address these and other issues while aiming to strike the right balance by providing a bundle of rights and obligations on companies, institutional investors, asset managers and proxy advisers.

On the one hand, companies have been granted the right to identify their shareholders but, on the other, they must provide greater transparency on executive pay and related-party transactions. Investors have gained more control over executive compensation and related-party transactions, but they will also be subject to more stringent transparency rules.

Overview of new requirements

1. Identification of shareholders

SRD II provides a right for companies to identify their shareholders, and intermediaries are obliged to cooperate in this process. That means that companies have the right to obtain information on shareholders’ identity from intermediaries.

To set up a communication channel ahead of annual general meetings, it is important for the issuer to identify its shareholders and ensure they receive all the information necessary in a timely manner, allowing for participation in the AGM.

Unfortunately, the directive allows member states to impose a threshold of up to 0.5% of shares, or voting rights, below which companies will not be compelled to identify their shareholders.

Moreover, as the directive aims to enhance shareholder engagement, thus transferring more power to shareholders regarding the remuneration of directors and related-party transactions, an effective cross-border shareholder identification system is essential.

Unfortunately, the directive allows member states to impose a threshold of up to 0.5% of shares, or voting rights, below which companies will not be compelled to identify their shareholders.

The issue is that, given the dispersed ownership of many companies, we hear that if a threshold is set at 0.5%, few shareholders would be identified. For example, one of the large German blue-chip companies in the DAX30 currently has more than 200,000 shareholders. If you set a threshold at 0.1%, only between 30 and 50 shareholders would be identified. If the threshold is at 0.5%, not even 10 shareholders would be identified.

Another issue that currently many companies face is cost. In some countries shareholder identification is very expensive due to intermediaries’ fees. For instance, in Italy some companies pay €2.5m to identify its one-million shareholders (€2.50 per shareholder), or €1m in the case of 230,000 shareholders (€4.34 per shareholder).

In Germany the cost reimbursed for transfer of shareholder data by issuer to the intermediary is up to €0.10, meaning significantly less. Therefore, the provisions of the directive regarding proportionality and transparency of costs are very welcome. It is also important that there is healthy competition among the providers of such services and that companies have the choice of whose services to use.

2. Communication between companies and investors, and facilitation of exercise of shareholder rights

New rules aim to facilitate the exercise of shareholders’ rights and to increase shareholder participation and voting at general meetings. Intermediaries are obliged to provide all information from the company to shareholders that will ensure the appropriate exercise of their rights.

These provisions are important both for investors and companies as there have been many so-called “plumbing” issues within the intermediary chain, especially in cross-border situations.

As a result, investors are discouraged from active engagement as they often face high costs and administrative burdens. It may even happen that a shareholder is denied attendance at an AGM due to poor attention to deadlines or even improperly completed documentation.

EuropeanIssuers has been chairing the industry group that developed Market Standards for General Meetings, which attempted to improve the situation. Unfortunately, due to their non-binding nature, certain market participants did not see the incentive in complying. We hope that these standards will be taken into account as the commission implements regulation.

3. Directors’ remuneration

To comply with the new provisions, companies will need to provide for a remuneration policy in relation to directors and draw up a clear and understandable remuneration report, providing a comprehensive overview of the remuneration awarded, or due, in accordance with the remuneration policy.

The directive provides that directors’ remuneration should contribute to the company’s business strategy, long-term interests and sustainability.

The directive also grants shareholders the right to vote on the remuneration policy (ex ante) and on the remuneration report (ex post) of the company’s directors. The former is in principle a binding vote, while the latter is advisory.

The remuneration policy must be submitted to a vote whenever there is a material change and at least every four years. The policy should also be publicly disclosed after the shareholder vote at the general meeting. The directive provides that directors’ remuneration should contribute to the company’s business strategy, long-term interests and sustainability.

The directors’ performance should be assessed considering both financial and non-financial performance criteria. The commission is working on the guidelines aimed at standardised presentation of the remuneration report.

4. Related-party transactions

The directive requires companies to publicly disclose material transactions with parties related to the company no later that at the time a transaction is concluded.

They must be accompanied by all necessary information to assess the fairness of the transaction. Also, material related-party transactions shall be approved by the shareholders, or the administrative or supervisory body, to provide adequate protection for the interests of the company and all its shareholders.

Recognising the fundamental differences between company law systems in Europe, it was left to member states to define material transactions and whether the approval should be granted by the general meeting or by the administrative or supervisory body. Member states may also make exempt those transactions entered in the ordinary course of business and concluded on normal market terms.

5. Transparency for institutional investors, asset managers and proxy advisers

Institutional investors and asset managers shall develop and publicly disclose an engagement policy including information on the exercise of voting rights, monitoring of the investee company, dialogue with the company, and the management of conflicts of interest. If not, they need to provide a proper explanation as to why they have chosen not to do so.

There are views that SRD II is only a step forward, and that more is necessary to improve engagement.

Institutional investors are also required to publish the main elements of their investment strategy and arrangements with asset managers. Asset managers are required to disclose to institutional investors how their investment strategy and its implementation complies with their arrangements and contributes to medium to long-term performance of the assets.

Similar requirements apply to proxy advisors whose important role in providing research, advice or voting recommendations to shareholders, has been recognised.

Nevertheless, there are views that SRD II is only a step forward, and that more is necessary to improve engagement. In that respect, accountability of funds to investors—as funds invest other people’s money at no risk to their own—and of proxy advisors to issuers and investors, could be addressed.

Next steps

The European Commission published the implementing regulation laying down minimum requirements on shareholder identification, transmission of information and facilitation of the exercise of shareholder rights on 10 September 2018.

The guidelines on remuneration are expected to be published by the second quarter of 2019. Meanwhile, member states are working on the transposition of the Directive.

Florence Bindelle is secretary general and Aleksandra Palinska is senior policy adviser at EuropeanIssuers.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • AGMs: Will changes to pre-emptive rights mean changes in votes?
    August 3, 2023
    pre-emptive rights

    New FRC guidance may affect how investors vote at UK AGMs, so boards should look to build shareholder trust by using their new powers wisely.

  • UK sees fall in number of shareholder votes against directors' re-election
    July 19, 2021
    shareholder vote, shareholder dissent

    In H1 there have been 38 significant shareholder votes against individual directors, the lowest six-month total in four years.

  • Europe sees 18% increase in shareholder revolts on executive pay
    September 7, 2021
    Businessman voting electronically

    Spain saw the greatest opposition to remuneration-related resolutions, with 60.6% contested—an increase of 33.2% year on year.

  • Shareholder dissent focuses on pay
    September 12, 2023
    AGM 2023

    AGM season review reveals that remuneration is still the topic that attracts most shareholder opposition in Europe.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap