Skip to content

11 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Audit woes and reform wrangles

by Gavin Hinks on September 19, 2018

A fierce debate is underway over the future of audit. Could it be resolved with an independent body appointing company auditors?

Photo: Shutterstock

In July 2002 Lord Sharman, a former chairman of KPMG International, conceded in the pages of Accountancy Age, a trade publication for bean counters, that having a public sector body audit listed companies might be a good idea.

Almost exactly 16 years later and history repeats itself, more or less. Last week a partner with the international accountancy and audit firm Grant Thornton floated the idea that a public body should be appointing auditors to listed companies.

The two ideas are subtly different. Lord Sharman suggested the National Audit Office might audit companies or, at the very least, be auditor of “last resort”, mirroring the role of the Bank of England to lenders. Grant Thornton’s proposal is that a public institution, such as the PSAA, the body that appoints auditors for local authorities in England, should appoint auditors to companies.

While the methods differ slightly, the aim remains the same: use a public, independent body to improve competition among audit firms and break the link that means that auditors check the homework of the people who appoint them.

Lord Sharman’s idea, though reasonable in principle, and perhaps a little shocking for audit firms at the time, failed to fly. Is Grant Thornton’s proposal likely to meet with greater support?

While the methods differ slightly, the aim remains the same: use a public body to improve competition among audit firms and break the link that means that auditors check the homework of the people who appoint them.

Appointing auditors

It’s worth reviewing the role of the PSAA. Created in 2014, the PSAA (Public Sector Audit Appointments) selects auditors for around 500 separate bodies, structured around five-year contracts based on aggregate expenditure of £54.5m annually, including the body’s costs.

However, PSAA does not appoint auditors on a one-contract-at-a-time basis. To make the process more economic, PSAA awards a contract that includes a “block” of audits; firms tender to be auditor then the body allocates the audits. Auditors are therefore never pitching to audit a specific local authority, thereby neatly side stepping potential conflicts of interest.

PSAA does one other interesting thing. It vets proposals for auditors to supply non-audit services to local authorities. In other words, non-audit services have to be disclosed and approved by PSAA before they can happen.

Audit committee chairs faced with reorganisation like that could expect significant upheaval in their work and responsibilities.

But a body like the PSAA for listed companies is not the only idea around addressed at resolving what has become an audit crisis. Others have suggested the Big Four audit firms —KPMG, PwC, EY and Deloitte—limit their activities to a certain percentage of the audit market. Some have suggested 80%, others say 60% would be a more reasonably slice of the cake.

Elsewhere, there are proposals for joint audits: two audit firms working on each audit. This is what happens in many European countries where the argument is that it ensures independence and allows smaller audit firms the chance to develop their capacity by sharing work.

Yet another frequently floated solution is to have a committee of investors appoint the auditors. That might be difficult, given how fleeting the holding period is for some shareholders. But those managing tracker funds might be cajoled into becoming involved.

Yet another idea that has so far received little airtime in the current debate is the possibility reforming the ownership rules for audit firms. Currently, only qualified auditors can own audit firms. Paul Boyle, a former chief executive of the Financial Reporting Council—the body that regulates auditors and writes the UK’s corporate governance code—argues that a change in the rules would allow more entrants to the audit market, thus making it more competitive.

Audit market, audit quality

Many in the audit industry concede that these are plausible reform proposals. But the Big Four firms are expected to argue that they miss one big issue: they probably do little to address audit quality.

The argument goes that the reliability of audit is where the scandals come from, the latest being KPMG’s much criticised work on the audit of Carillion, the UK construction giant that failed at the beginning of this year. (This week it also emerged the firm has admitted “misconduct” over regulatory work it did for BNY Mellon, an investment bank).

The Big Four will argue that audit quality issues are being conflated with market issues. One won’t solve the other.

As one audit veteran told Board Agenda this week: “Having different players in a flawed system, doesn’t make the system any better.”

That leads to an argument that the underlying problem is a financial reporting system which now places too much store in telling the future and is accompanied by few obvious statements about the risk involved in compiling and, likewise, reviewing forward looking information. While companies are expected to devine the future, and auditors expected to sign off on it, big shocks remain likely.

“As one audit veteran told Board Agenda this week: “Having different players in a flawed system, doesn’t make the system any better.”

Whatever the arguments perhaps the bigger issue is whether government has the appetite, or bandwidth, to invest in significant change. History suggests it will plumb for incremental change, well short of anything significantly disruptive.

More than a decade ago Lord Sharman wrote: “I am completely confident that if audit firms rededicate themselves to their stated obligation of working on behalf of the shareholders then the wind of change will only have blown beneficially for corporate governance.” Sharman may be disappointed with audit as it is now. But his hope also jars with the current zeitgeist, or public sentiment, that companies must be run for a wider group of stakeholders than just stock owners. That alone could be enough to compel government into some form of action.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • FRC unveils new audit committee standards
    November 10, 2022
    audit committee standards

    Watchdog’s guidance to audit committees aims at expanding choice and addressing competition within the audit market.

  • Further delay for audit reform
    September 1, 2023
    audit reform delay

    Long-awaited legislation to create a new audit and governance watchdog may not see light until after the election, says news report.

  • Jan du Plessis gives first insights into FRC governance and audit reform
    January 27, 2022
    BT chair Jan du Plessis

    The prospective FRC chair acknowledged that the watchdog's own governance needs reform, and that audit scandals have damaged its reputation.

  • Government publishes response to audit reform proposals
    May 31, 2022
    Magnifying glass on audit documents

    While directors will face sanctions for inadequate company reporting and audit committee duties, other key reforms have been watered down.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap