Skip to content

12 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Heartache to headache: why workplace relationships are a problem

by Gavin Hinks

McDonald’s and BlackRock have both parted ways with senior executives after workplace relationships came to light. So what are the risks of an office romance?

heart on an office window, workplace relationships

Image: Wavebreak Media/Shutterstock

Late last year workplace relationships hit the headlines with a bang. First global fast-food chain McDonald’s fired its British chief executive Steve Easterbrook for having a relationship with an employee. Then it happened again. This time BlackRock, the world’s biggest fund manager, parted company with senior executive Mark Wiseman for similar reasons following a “romantic relationship with a colleague”. Wiseman had been touted as a potential successor to BlackRock’s CEO Larry Fink.

Suddenly, workplace relationships were boardroom topics in two of the world’s most successful companies. Wiseman said in a statement that he was going because he had failed to disclose a consensual relationship. Easterbrook went because he broke a company rule that outlaws relationships between high-ranking leaders and their subordinates.

Such events—and here we’re talking only about consensual relationships—are messy. It’s heartache and a career car crash for the individuals involved and a reputational quagmire for boards and their companies. There are also difficult succession issues if it results in the loss of key managers and staff.

The risks of romance

According to Laurie Girand, president of the US-based not-for-profit I’m With Them, relationships at work inevitably involve the company.

“In short, when two consenting adults working for the same employer are in bed, the company is in bed with them,” she says. “Sometimes, spouses are too. It gets crowded.”

Putting aside the human drama of conducting a secret relationship at work, what the Easterbrook and Wiseman examples highlight is the need for clear policies at work that everyone understands.

Some statistics support this. Last year Vault, a US workplace analyst, found that only 42% of more than 700 people polled had not engaged in an office romance. Of those that had, 64% had kept it secret. Forbes magazine reports that 41% of employees do not know their employer’s policies on such romances.

“When two consenting adults working for the same employer are in bed, the company is in bed with them”

—Laurie Girand, I’m With Them

Workplace relationships are to some extent inevitable; indeed, many people meet their future partners at work. It should come as no surprise that senior executives would form bonds with people at the place where they spend so much of their time and give so much of their physical and emotional energy. These are the people with whom they will possibly share many of the most intense highs and lows of their careers, even their lives.

But leaders should also understand the risks they are running. Decision-making may be impaired; a company could face claims of unfair treatment at work—either from an individual spurned in a workplace relationship, or from colleagues who feel the relationship caused them to be overlooked.

Girand says it’s an “integrity” issue. Employers have an obligation to provide “quality” performance that benefits the employer. A relationship in the office can undermine that promise. She compares it to substance abuse that interferes with performance and choices made at work. “An intimate relationship in a work setting can also impair judgment,” she says.

Problems for a company can turn on whether a relationship turns sour and the asymmetrical power that may exist between those in the relationship.

Most intimate relationships end. Of those, many end badly, says Girand. “The problem may not be with the happy couple of which everyone approves but the potential for a rocky ending which adversely affects colleagues or has financial or legal impact on the company.

“When the relationship involves a power differential, the chances that the company will be engaged in a claim of unfair employment treatment are higher; such a claim could come from the less powerful party, or from others who would claim they were passed over for opportunities because of favourable treatment of the paramour.”

Establishing expectations

All of this adds up to clear policies in the employee handbook that set clear expectations for all employees. According to Rachel Suff, senior employment relations adviser at the CIPD, a professional body for HR departments, some employers will take a common sense approach, while others choose to “set out expectations of behaviour”.

“It’s for each organisation to establish the rules that should apply in the event of a senior leader forming a romantic consensual relationship with a more junior employee,” says Suff. “It is best to be open and transparent about the relationship, if possible, and discuss any implications with the wider team.

“If there are confidentiality issues or a potential conflict of interest, it’s advisable for there to be a requirement for the individuals to declare the relationship to the HR team, so any wider implications can be discussed concerning work and wider team morale.”

“The company will need to take a view on whether a particular corporate risk arises by the nature of the relationship”

—Philippa Foster Back, Institute of Business Ethics

Potential conflicts of interest, or fairness if one person manages the other, can be dealt with in a number of ways. An individual can be transferred to another team or area of the business under different managers. Alternative arrangements can be made for performance reviews.

According to Philippa Foster Back, director of the Institute of Business Ethics, disclosure to HR is a critical step.

“It should be clear that each staff member has to take responsibility and tell HR when this arises as the company will need to take a view on whether a particular corporate risk arises by the nature of the relationship—e.g. a member of accounts having password control on a payment system having a relationship with the payables manager,” says Foster Back.

She adds: “Equally the company should be clear in its policy that if the relationship is non-consensual then individuals should report such behaviour immediately through the normal ‘speak up’ channels.”

Putting policies in place will necessarily mean legal advice on employment law and a board’s fiduciary duties.

A last word to Laurie Girand. Despite the fact it’s easier today than ever before to meet people who do not work with you, people will always form relationships at work. But boards expect managers to act with good judgment and exercise self-control.

“Will there be people who don’t always exhibit good judgment and self-control? Yes,” says Girand.

“Are they the people you want running a company? No.”

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Ethics in the technology sector remains a headline issue
    January 26, 2022
    Businessman has biometric data scanned

    For a second year running technology is the sector that garnered the most news stories about ethical lapses—with data privacy a key concern.

  • FTSE 350 fall short on codes of ethics
    May 15, 2023
    FTSE ethics

    Of the half of companies that have publicly available codes of ethics, only 57% of the codes are up to scratch, survey finds.

  • Annual survey reveals 42% of the public consider business 'unethical'
    January 18, 2022
    Employees commuting to work

    The Institute of Business Ethics says just 40% of those polled in its annual survey think business is ethical—down from 59% in 2020.

  • Investment managers hesitant to embrace ethics as part of ESG
    March 21, 2022
    Business ethics on cogs

    Study finds investors shy away from direct talk of ethics, but some are assessing company culture as an indicator of ESG performance.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap