Skip to content

8 February, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • CEO legacy

      Long-standing CEOs can leave a legacy of trouble for boards

      Performance and productivity can suffer after a long-tenured chief executive leaves the company, researchers find.

    • cost-of-living crisis Aviva highlights cost-of-living crisis

      Fund calls for ‘mindful’ pay ratios, showing executive pay is now firmly an issue for...

    • diversity talent pipeline News round-up: this week in governance

      Target diversity early; directors job market 'ossified'; US extends duty of oversight; 'kindness bias' hinders...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • mission zero

      Can the UK achieve net zero by 2050?

      To gain economic benefits, UK businesses will need resilient and flexible supply chains to provide...

    • governance recession

      What use is governance in a recession?

      Companies seeking competitive advantage in uncertain times will find that effective governance allows much sharper...

    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO legacy Long-standing CEOs can leave a legacy of trouble for boards

      Performance and productivity can suffer after a long-tenured chief executive leaves the company, researchers find.

    • diversity talent pipeline News round-up: this week in governance

      Target diversity early; directors job market 'ossified'; US extends duty of oversight; 'kindness bias' hinders...

    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Debate over ‘shareholder’ or ‘stakeholder’ primacy goes global

by Gavin Hinks on August 28, 2019

The US Business Roundtable’s recent letter saw scores of chief executives sign up to a stakeholder model of governance. Around the world commentators have offered their analysis of the decision.

Photo: Shutterstock

It takes a Nobel prize-winning economist to make the obvious comment. Writing on the US Business Roundtable’s decision to switch from backing “shareholder” primacy to a “stakeholder” model as its guiding mantra, Joseph Stiglitz writes it has caused “quite a stir”.

And indeed, it has. Since the Roundtable made its announcement last week, reversing a core tenet of US business values that placed profits and share price above all other objectives, an untold number of words has been written in commentary around the world as observers came to terms with what it might mean.

Some veered toward proclaiming the end of days, or at least the end of capitalism, as we know it. Others offered a wordy “about time” kind of view. Some have described it as a cynical effort to curry favour with Democrat presidential candidates who have made the reform of US corporate governance a central plank of their campaign policies. Others see in the change of heart a profound observation about what motivates executives.

“There must be a level playing field, ensuring that firms with a conscience aren’t undermined by those that don’t”

—Joseph Stiglitz

Led by Jamie Dimon, chair and chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, the Roundtable said in an open letter: “Each of our stakeholders is essential. We commit to deliver value to all of them, for the future success of our companies, our communities and our country.”

In his own comments, Dimon implied this latest step would help repair the American dream, which he described as “alive, but fraying”.

Stiglitz points out that he has been writing about the problems with “shareholder primacy” since the late 1970s, quite rightly bringing attention to the fact that this is a debate that has been around for decades.

Writing for Project Syndicate, he argues the real implication of the Roundtable’s decision is that corporate America needs regulation to ensure all companies are operating in the same way because, while some may choose a “stakeholder” path, others would not as part of their own efforts to win competitive advantage.

“But while many CEOs may want to do the right thing (or have family and friends who do), they know they have competitors who don’t,” Stiglitz writes.

“There must be a level playing field, ensuring that firms with a conscience aren’t undermined by those that don’t. That’s why many corporations want regulations against bribery, as well as rules protecting the environment and workplace health and safety.”

Stiglitz then observes that Dimon is part of an industry—banking—that has lobbied against regulation contained in 2011’s Dodd-Frank Act, legislation designed to help avoid another financial crisis.

Dimon is targeted again in another commentary. In Katharina Pistor’s observations she notes Dimon is both chair and CEO of JPMorgan Chase, a position in direct contravention of US corporate governance principles which advises against the same leader occupying both posts.

But Pistor’s commentary runs deeper. She is concerned the Roundtable has moved to embrace “stakeholders” because they see a greater threat to themselves and their ability to hold on to their positions: shareholders.

“Share-price primacy has not only ceased to protect CEOs in the way it once did; it has become a threat”

—Katharina Pistor

Shareholding, Pistor writes, is now formed into blocs with institutions beginning to wield great power. This is far from the days when shareholdings were highly “dispersed”, which allowed executive to make a “mockery’ of shareholder control. Shareholder primacy, she writes, never meant “shareholder democracy”, instead it provided cover for executives to do what they pleased.

Jamie Dimon
Business Roundtable chair and JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon at the Fortune Global Forum. Image by Fortune Live Media, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

“Why, then, would CEOs come out against a status quo that has allowed them to reign almost unchallenged, in favor of a stakeholder-governance model that puts employees and the environment on an equal footing with shareholders?” asks Pistor.

“The answer is that revolutions often devour their children. Share-price primacy has not only ceased to protect CEOs in the way it once did; it has become a threat.

“After all, it is one thing to champion shareholders when they are too dispersed to organize themselves. It is quite a different matter when shareholders have assembled into blocs with effective veto power and the ability to coordinate in pursuit of common goals.”

Others offered a welcome and a warning. Writing in the Financial Times, Sarah Kaplan, a professor at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, said the Roundtable’s move demonstrated a “will” to address the “conflicting interests of various stakeholders”.

“But ensuring that this is note mere window dressing will take skill,” she notes and points out that solutions are not easy and that “trade-offs” uncovered in business models as they manage diverse stakeholders should be used as “opportunities for innovation and rethinking” the way business is done.

In the same feature Geoffrey Owen, head of industrial policy at the Policy Exchange, a think tank, argues that the argument over shareholder or stakeholder primacy is based on a error in the way business is understood.

“When businesses concern themselves directly and predominantly with profits, they are not showing excessive regard for owners as distinct from stakeholders. Nor are they slighting other worthy objectives or allowing greed to govern its actions. Prioritising profits means focusing on the most obvious value to society.

“The idea that a company’s main contribution to society comes from other aspects of its activities not directly related to profitability derives from a fundamental misunderstanding of what business does.”

Theo Vermaelen, professor of finance at INSEAD, goes further, calling the stakeholder model a “practically useless concept” because it fails to offer guidance to managers on how to make decisions. He says it does nothing to answer how to manage trade-offs between different stakeholders and their interests.

“The [Business Rountable] statement lacks clarity about how corporations can juggle the needs of all these stakeholders and what happens if shareholders decide to take their much-needed cash elsewhere,” writes Vermaelen.

“The always-superior, Western corporate mechanism theory is now more inclined to the China approach. The turning point for mutual studying between Eastern and Western corporate systems is approaching”

—Cao Heping

Lastly, perhaps one of the most interesting comments comes from Cao Heping,  a professor in the School of Economics at Peking University. Heping suggests the Roundtable’s statement brings western capitalism closer to Chinese companies and their capital structures, for example Huawei, with its employee shareholder programmes, which he calls a “partnership model”.

This, he suggests, highlights global competition and how it might play out.

“If joint-stock listed companies don’t do anything to change their governance methods, they may lose to the challenges posed by such partnership companies.

“It seems that China has a comparative advantage to pass on and develop such a partnership model, given its historical emphasis on public goods.

“The always-superior, Western corporate mechanism theory is now more inclined to the China approach. The turning point for mutual studying between Eastern and Western corporate systems is approaching.”

Joseph Stiglitz comments that it is too early to know the true implications of the Roundtable’s statement. We can only wait and see.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • ESG reporting all-important in stakeholder engagement
    July 7, 2022
    stocks, asset management, shares, investor engagement

    Experts advise that by boosting their annual reporting, boards can build trust and form more meaningful relationships with investors.

  • Shell faces shareholder litigation over climate risk
    March 15, 2022
    Shell logo

    Campaign group ClientEarth claims board members have breached their directors’ duties by failing to “properly prepare” for climate change.

  • Ericsson faces shareholder ire over Iraq investigation
    March 29, 2022
    Ericsson building in Stockholm, Sweden

    Reports say investors including Cevian and Norges Bank will vote against a resolution to discharge board liability over compliance breaches.

  • BlackRock to test shareholder democracy in the UK
    November 3, 2022
    Blackrock shareholder democracy

    Chief executive Larry Fink seeks ‘to translate individual investor views into voting instructions’ for the first time.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Business Roundtable, Jamie Dimon, Joseph Stiglitz, shareholder primacy, Stakeholder primacy

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Investors favour votes against directors over say-on-climate proposals
  • Shell overhauls its board
  • ESG grows in importance as driver of M&As
  • What use is governance in a recession?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|