Skip to content

20 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • woke silicon valley bank

      News round-up: this week in governance

      GOP declares SVB ‘woke’; banks slow to sustainability; fund managers accused of dodging voting risks;...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty

      Boards lack the understanding needed to face environmental and social challenges, according to LBS professor.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

    • digital transformation

      Digital transformation: Get the basics right

      Board involvement at the get-go will boost the chances of a successful digital transformation for...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

ESG reporting: what is the endgame?

by George Dallas

Non-financial reporting is a challenge for issuers, investors and standard-setters on both sides of the Atlantic. The task ahead is to develop a coherent vision and unified agenda.

wind turbines, climate change, ESG, LGIM

Image: Shutterstock

On a chilly evening in early December 2018 the Oxford Union was filled to capacity to witness a debate on the seemingly arcane topic of non-financial information.

The motion before the House was the question as to whether corporate sustainability reporting should be mandated and standardised by the FASB and IASB for it to be most useful for investors.

The debate itself was a spirited mixture of rhetorical flourish, informed insight and entertainment, replete with cries of “rubbish”, accusations of rudeness, continual interruptions and cocksure interjections from swashbuckling undergrads.

At the end of it all, the House was divided on the question at hand, with no clear outcome by show of hands nor by vocal ayes and nays.

Of note, however, is less who the won the debate than the fact that non-financial information, which investors often call ESG (environmental, social, governance) reporting, is being debated publicly, and passionately, as a serious matter for financial standard-setters—and broader public policy.

Differing philosophies

The fault line laid down in the Oxford debate as to the desirability of the accounting standards bodies to take on non-financial reporting under their wings was in many ways a reflection of differing economic philosophies. If there was an elephant in the room shaping these different philosophies it was geographical bias—one with a strong American accent, the other very much British/European.

The American perspective is characterised by the view that financial accounting information and standards are fundamentally different from non-financial reporting, and that it is inappropriate to blend the two. This reflects in many ways a traditional, and narrow, focus on the primacy of rules-based financial reporting, for the benefit of shareholders. It also belies a sometimes overt—and sometimes unstated—suspicion of the political agenda of those who advocate ESG reporting.

ESG reporting is a way to communicate many non-financial aspects of stakeholder relations

On the opposite side of the Atlantic, both in continental Europe and in the UK, the argument reflects a different vision of capital markets and corporate reporting. ESG reporting is regarded less as a political preference and more as a broader view of risk and opportunity—both for individual companies, but also for stakeholders, societies and markets more broadly.

In the UK this reflects the core directors’ duties in Section 172 of the Company Act of 2006 to “have regard” for stakeholder interests in promoting the long-term success of the company. It also builds from the recent focus given to stakeholder relations in the 2018 revision of the UK Corporate Governance Code.

In this context, ESG reporting is a way to communicate many non-financial aspects of stakeholder relations, and integrated reporting is growing in visibility for a platform to frame financial, ESG performance and other forms of non-financial disclosures in a unified way.

The value of ESG reporting

While the debate on the role of standard-setting bodies in non-financial reporting may be at an impasse, the investor community has begun to weigh in to this argument, not by expressing specific regulatory preferences, but rather by explaining why investors value ESG reporting and what they are looking for from companies and standard-setters.

To this end, in October 2018 the International Corporate Governance Network and Principles for Responsible Investment published a discussion paper supported by contributions from a group of global investor organisations. It framed the understanding of ESG issues as a fiduciary duty of investors interested in long-term corporate success and addressed a wide range of reporting questions.

Of the many points addressed the key conclusions were as follows:

• There is a clear business case for ESG reporting for investors and companies. Particularly in a world in which 85–90% of market capitalisation can be in the form of intangible assets, ESG reporting can help investors and companies better understand material ESG-related risks and opportunities that help to account for these intangibles. Academic studies increasingly support the claim that there is a clear linkage between ESG factors, company performance and investor preferences.

• There is no single solution—one set of metrics or a single framework—that will satisfy all users of ESG data. The heterogeneity of ESG data users —investors, stakeholders and companies—will remain, and this is not inherently a bad thing. However, it should be possible to serve different needs and still come to a more unified agenda. From companies’ perspectives, ESG issues are endogenous and difficult to standardise. In spite of these challenges, we believe that companies should seek to identify and publish material ESG issues and relevant key performance indicators (KPIs) as part of their annual reports. Integrated reporting may provide a good framework for this.

There is no single solution—one set of metrics or a single framework—that will satisfy all users of ESG data

• At the same time, it would be beneficial for companies to disclose standardised ESG information at a basic level to complement more customised ESG reporting, just as financial accounting has required its own disclosure standards. Over time, this can lead to developing standards of third-party assurance with regard to ESG information.

• Both investors and companies need to think more about systemic issues, including the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations, the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their links to individual companies. For companies this is a matter of strategy and sustainable value creation. For investors, particularly those with longer-term time horizons, systemic risks need to be reflected in valuation models and incorporated into engagement with company executives and board members.

• Investors would benefit from members of the Corporate Reporting Dialogue (CRD) proactively articulating how its different bodies fit together. The CRD is an important initiative to provide a clear direction and coordination for a range of standard-setters of both financial accounting and non-financial information. It is positive to note that the CRD has embarked upon a two-year project aimed at greater harmonisation of its constituent bodies, exploring the complementarities, as well as the potential disconnects or conflicts. Investor bodies are in dialogue with the CRD and we believe that a workable “solution” can be achieved with the existing data providers and standard-setters: namely, the current members of the CRD. Investors generally support improving coordination of existing frameworks rather than creating new ones. However, it is incumbent on the standard-setting organisations to present a coherent vision of how these standards can and should work together.

As to the question as to whether it should be FASB, IASB or some other standard-setter to mandate and standardise non-financial information, that debate may have greater clarity at the end of this CRD deliberation.

But what is the endgame?

A commonly agreed vision between issuers, investors and standard-setters is a nice place to start—one that enables ESG reporting to grow in quantity, relevance and quality—with a view towards a wider understanding of opportunities and risks for all market participants.

George Dallas is policy director at the International Corporate Governance Network.

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Cutting quarterly reporting may undermine the value of companies
    November 2, 2021
    Quarterly results in cityscape

    Research suggests a decrease in quarterly reporting is linked to decreased company value—and impacts smaller firms more than larger firms.

  • ESG reporting all-important in stakeholder engagement
    July 7, 2022
    stocks, asset management, shares, investor engagement

    Experts advise that by boosting their annual reporting, boards can build trust and form more meaningful relationships with investors.

  • Climate leadership: meeting the challenges of ESG
    April 5, 2022
    Businessman with ESG and climate items

    A new certification programme aims to equip boardrooms with knowledge to confront the challenges and opportunities presented by climate risk.

  • Jan du Plessis lined up as next chair of the Financial Reporting Council
    January 7, 2022
    BT chair Jan du Plessis

    The appointment of Du Plessis, chair of BT Group and a former chair of Rio Tinto and SABMiller, is subject to parliamentary approval.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Corporate Reporting Dialogue, ESG, ESG reporting, George Dallas, ICGN, non-financial reporting, Principles for Responsible Investment

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty
  • How to boost decision making
  • Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|