Skip to content

23 April, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • AI agents

      The AI risk faced by every board right now

      Even if no one in the organisation planned their arrival, AI agents are already present...

      sustainability litigation

      Is your board at risk of sustainability litigation?

      ESG disclosures, until recently focused on reputational risk and stakeholder expectations, are now becoming legal...

      sustainability Asia

      Navigating sustainability in Asia

      Boards operating across regions need to leave aside assumptions and consider the impact of a...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • AI agents

      The AI risk faced by every board right now

      Even if no one in the organisation planned their arrival, AI agents are already present...

      sustainability litigation

      Is your board at risk of sustainability litigation?

      ESG disclosures, until recently focused on reputational risk and stakeholder expectations, are now becoming legal...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

      stewarding AI

      AI is a ‘special case for governance’

      As AI use in the boardroom grows, it’s essential to focus on the ethical and...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • female CEO

      Number of women in leadership stays unchanged

      In 2021, there were only eight female CEOs in the FTSE 100—a figure that is...

      female NED

      UK female non-executives earn £73k less than male NEDs

      Although the UK’s average gender pay gap on boards is shrinking, it is still one...

      directors duties

      3 top tips on directors’ duties

      When directors fall short of their responsibilities, the consequences can be devastating. How can board...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • FRC audit approach cover march 2026

      An evolved audit supervision approach 2026

      The Financial Reporting Council outlines its revised approach to audit supervision, which focuses on firms’...

      Protiviti 2026 governance AI

      The Board’s AI Moment, 2026

      This report, from Protiviti’s 2026 Global Board Governance Survey results, focuses on artificial intelligence.

      HEIDRICK GOVERNANCE 2026

      Governing Under High Uncertainty: Opportunities for Emerging-Market Boards

      This report from Boston Consulting Group, Heidrick & Struggles and INSEAD examines how boards are...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Enduring institutions prosper through serving society

by Denis B Kilroy

The drive for sustainability has to some extent undermined the concept of shareholder value. Denis Kilroy argues that the key strategy companies should be pursuing is creating ongoing value and wealth.

Photo: Shutterstock

Favorite

The real economic challenge facing the board and executive team of a listed company is not to maximise value for existing shareholders, or even to create shareholder wealth per se. Instead, it is to build an enduring institution capable of creating value for customers and wealth for shareholders on an ongoing basis.

The word “ongoing” here is key, because the way a company goes about creating customer value and building shareholder wealth is often the primary determinant of its ability to continue to do so. And it is entirely possible to pursue these joint and mutually reinforcing goals in ways that deliberately set out to enhance the wellbeing of all legitimate stakeholders, including the wider community and the environment.

Of course, there is no obligation for business leaders to steer their company in this direction—at least not yet. But those that do will need a clear understanding of the value or benefit that they are setting out to create for customers. Will it be real customer value stemming from the provision of useful, beneficial or healthy products or services, the consumption or use of which contributes to their customers’ long-term wellbeing? Or will it be artificial value arising largely from the satisfaction of desires created by successful marketing campaigns, with no thought given to their customers’ longer-term wellbeing?

If sufficient companies choose to focus predominantly on creating real or authentic value for customers, then the foundations of a new and more socially responsible business paradigm will have been laid.

The economic aspects of directors’ duties should probably be reinterpreted as a requirement to build an enduring institution that can create value for customers, and wealth for shareholders, on an ongoing basis

Under that new paradigm, the goal of listed company leadership teams could be to seek to build enduring organisations that prosper through serving society. They could do this by creating real or authentic value for customers, by building significant wealth for shareholders, and by doing both in ways that quite deliberately set out to enhance the wellbeing of all legitimate stakeholders (including employees, suppliers, the wider community and the environment).

Noble intent

There are two components to the mindset required to move in this direction. The first is a noble intent or purpose that goes well beyond just seeking to maximise shareholder value. A focus on creating real or authentic value for customers reflects such an intent.

The second is the realisation that all legitimate stakeholders are really allies in creating customer value and building shareholder wealth over the long term—not adversaries in the pursuit of profit over the short term. In fact, the longer the planning horizon, the more the interests of all stakeholders align.

Central to this new stream of thought is a material breakthrough in applied corporate finance and business economics called the Bow Wave of Expected Economic Profits. The EP Bow Wave construct provides a complete financial justification for a more noble, more inclusive and perhaps more conscious approach to business. It has profound implications for corporate governance and offers unique insights into some of the most pressing issues that confront listed companies.

These include quantifying the impact on value of investing in innovation, and providing a clear and unequivocal means through which to resolve the tension that often exists between meeting short-term financial performance goals and creating value over the longer term.

There is a Bow Wave of Expected EP embedded in the share price and market capitalisation of every listed company at every point in time. Wealth is created for shareholders, when management finds a way to enhance the shape of the EP Bow Wave—making it higher with enhanced returns, wider through greater growth, or longer from actions that make the business more sustainable, as illustrated in Figure 1, below.

Fig 1: The Bow Wave of Expected Economic Profits

The EP Bow Wave provides the first truly reliable mechanism with which to establish exactly how the performance achieved by management in the market for their company’s products and services translates into the capital market outcomes experienced by shareholders.

Indeed, it represents such a fundamental shift in understanding the economics of listed companies, that it provided Westpac Banking Corporation’s forward-thinking CEO Brian Hartzer with the analytical and conceptual underpinning of what he had come to believe through years of business experience: that despite what many executives and commentators believe, there is no conflict at all between doing the right thing by customers, staff and the community, and doing the right thing by shareholders.

Measuring wealth creation

A Pair of EP Bow Waves constructed in two dimensions rather than three at the beginning and the end of a measurement period can tell us a lot about how wealth was created over that period. As is evident in Figure 2, there are always two potential sources of wealth creation: that created by exceeding existing EP expectations during the measurement period, and that created by establishing new EP expectations to be delivered beyond the measurement period. The latter is more important, and particularly so for more successful companies.

For the 63 ASX-listed, 69 NYSE-listed and 67 LSE-listed companies within the top 100 in each market, which succeeded in creating wealth for shareholders between 2010 and 2015, the main source of wealth creation was not exceeding existing EP expectations, but an increase in expectations in relation to longer-term performance.

The more successful the company, the higher the proportion of wealth creation that came from establishing new EP expectations (see the right-hand side of Figure 2, below), and the greater the proportion that came from making the business more sustainable (that is, from a longer EP Bow Wave). The underlying driver of this phenomenon is innovation focused mainly on finding ways to enhance value for customers.

Fig 2. Wealth creation profile for top performers in ASX100, S&P100 and FTSE100—2010-2015

This understanding runs completely counter to the views of most business commentators, many of whom are obsessed with companies meeting or exceeding short-term financial performance targets. Yet it supports the contention that the true economic objective of a listed company leadership team is to build an enduring institution.

A wealth-creating endeavour

Companies that become enduring institutions tend to have EP Bow Wave profiles that improve steadily over time, up to a natural limit of around 50 to 60 years. After that, maintaining the EP Bow Wave becomes a wealth-creating endeavour in its own right. But allowing the EP Bow Wave to erode will always destroy shareholder wealth, irrespective of current business performance.

The implications of this new understanding for corporate governance practice, for performance measurement and management, for executive reward plan design, and for the interpretation of the economic aspects of the fiduciary duties of directors, are significant.

In the case of fiduciary duties, in most jurisdictions directors’ duties are not owed to shareholders. They are owed to the company, with the interests of shareholders being satisfied through the success of the company. However, it is not uncommon for the economic aspects of those duties to be distilled into a requirement to maximise returns for existing shareholders.

All legitimate stakeholders are really allies in creating customer value and building wealth over the long term

The EP Bow Wave construct shows that this simplistic interpretation is built on an incomplete understanding. In combination with the EPS Myth (the widely held but misguided belief that enhancing short-term earnings or EPS will enhance shareholder wealth), this interpretation of directors’ duties has been contributing inadvertently to the propagation of short-termism within listed companies for many years.

One of the most important consequences of the understanding that comes with the EP Bow Wave construct is that the economic aspects of directors’ duties should probably be reinterpreted as a requirement to build an enduring institution that can create value for customers, and wealth for shareholders, on an ongoing basis. Success in this is evident in the shape, and in the change in shape, of the company’s EP Bow Wave.

There are many examples of this contained in our book, Customer Value, Shareholder Wealth, Community Wellbeing, published in August. The book also puts the case for a complete rethink of executive reward plan design.

The EP Bow Wave construct shines a light on the fact that current approaches to executive reward have also been a major contributor to the propagation of short-termism.

Denis B Kilroy is the co-author with Marvin Schneider of Customer Value, Shareholder Wealth, Community Wellbeing: A Roadmap for Companies and Investors, published by Palgrave Macmillan, August 2017.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • UK sees fall in number of shareholder votes against directors' re-election
    July 19, 2021
    shareholder vote, shareholder dissent

    In H1 there have been 38 significant shareholder votes against individual directors, the lowest six-month total in four years.

  • Europe sees 18% increase in shareholder revolts on executive pay
    September 7, 2021
    Businessman voting electronically

    Spain saw the greatest opposition to remuneration-related resolutions, with 60.6% contested—an increase of 33.2% year on year.

  • Shareholder dissent focuses on pay
    September 12, 2023
    AGM 2023

    AGM season review reveals that remuneration is still the topic that attracts most shareholder opposition in Europe.

  • How to streamline workplace supply chains
    March 4, 2024
    streamline workplace

    Sometimes it pays—in terms of efficiency, sustainability and a healthier bottom line—to consolidate your suppliers.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 - UK insights

Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy