Skip to content

11 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Human capital disclosure – resist, comply or exploit?

by Paul Kearns on August 1, 2017

Efforts to improve global reporting on human capital management represents a major shift in corporate governance, and offers companies a competitive advantage that no board should ignore.

Image: Blueguy, Shutterstock

On 6 July 2017, the Human Capital Management Coalition (“the Coalition”), a group of 25 asset owners representing more than $2.8trn in assets, petitioned the US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) to change its rules requiring company reporting to “disclose information about their human capital management policies, practices and performance”.

The Coalition is seeking these disclosures because it is convinced that they are material to their investments; any board would be delinquent if it failed to investigate further.

The implications of this development are far-reaching, and a well-conceived response is required if you are to avoid any unwanted repercussions. The Maturity Institute’s comment to the SEC has already been posted and should be useful in helping you to formulate your response.

Of course, your preferred option might be to ignore the petition, especially if your company does not fall within the SEC’s jurisdiction. Such a stance is unlikely to help though. This petition is not the only initiative on human capital reporting. The ISO (International Organization for Standardization) supports the petition, as part of improving global HR standards and, in the UK, ShareAction’s Workforce Disclosure Initiative, backed by 79 investment bodies, has already landed on the desks of the FTSE100.

If you want such activity to add value, rather than add further “box-ticking” to your bureaucracy, you should be proactive and take control of the agenda. The Coalition is seeking these disclosures because it is convinced that they are material to their investments; any board would be delinquent if it failed to investigate further.

Competitive advantage

When you understand the full implications of human capital disclosure you will begin to realise that it represents the most significant shift in corporate governance in your lifetime and a tremendous competitive advantage if you do it right.

Your first advantage comes when you realise that the SEC, the Coalition, the ISO and ShareAction have no expertise in the field of human capital measurement. For example, the petition asks for “specific rules-based disclosures such as the amount spent on employee training in the past year” (page 27). You might see nothing untoward in this apparently innocuous data and you probably collect it already.

Talking about people as your “greatest asset” is one thing; providing evidence that you realise its value is another.

A mature, human capital analyst, however, views it in a totally different light. They regard it as throwing money at training without any evidence of value to show for it. It implies you employ people who like going on courses without taking any accountability for the outcome. Ill-conceived human capital metrics can unwittingly send all the wrong signals.

Talking about people as your “greatest asset” is one thing; providing evidence that you realise its value is another. The requirement to treat people as valuable capital is already disrupting the conventions of management.

Human capital value

Ask yourself where human capital value is shown in your company accounts today: it is nowhere to be seen, because the conventional training your chief financial officer (CFO) received only measures people in terms of their cost. Any professional CFO will quietly admit as much.

In fact, it is the accounting bodies signed up to the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), based at the ACCA HQ in London, which is promoting a new “integrated reporting framework” to incorporate human capital—even though they have yet to produce convincing measures.

“People as cost” has always been a fundamental flaw in accounting theory, and “people risk” continues to be a huge blind spot in audit practice.

“People as cost” has always been a fundamental flaw in accounting theory, and “people risk” continues to be a huge blind spot in audit practice. This is why annual reports have so little to say about the value of employees, and any references to people being your “greatest asset” are likely to ring hollow, even if they are genuinely heartfelt.

People never were an asset and never will be. Better to focus on the value they create today and their potential value for the future. Scrap existing measures of “training hours”: at best, they make you appear like a “benevolent patriarch/matriarch” but from an earlier, antiquated, style of leadership.

Human resources

The person you might reasonably expect would have all the right data, your chief human resources officer, was the one who produced employee numbers and training hours for your last annual report. If he/she has not already earned a place on your board, it is probably because they never provided any evidence of their own value. Before you invite them to your next board meeting you should realise that they face the same predicament as the accountants. Their biggest professional body, the SHRM (the American Society for Human Resource Management), signally failed to rise to their own challenge of setting international standards for “investor metrics”, under the auspices of ISO, back in 2012.

This partly explains why the Coalition had to open up their own direct route to the SEC. Moreover, they are particularly concerned with having the most accurate and predictive indicators of long-term performance. They have to be able to spot the missed value opportunities and hidden risks behind the present, very limited, and sometimes misleading information offered.

For example, which bank is most likely to be harbouring the next “rogue trader”? How confident are you that the next scandal or crisis, in terms of people risk, is not just around the corner? Your shareholders and investors need to know today, not after the event.

Human capital indicators

Who knows how the SEC will react to this petition? Will it result in better human capital indicators? At least the Coalition is ahead of the human capital information field when it asks for “… more open-ended principles-based disclosures like how training expenditures are aligned with a changing business strategy” (page 26). This is right on target in value terms, and you would do well to make a simple decision on this today.

All training that fails to satisfy either of these two clear criteria is, by definition, unfocused and potentially worthless expenditure.

You can establish a solid principle, and a workable policy, for every single employee attending any training programme. Before they attend, they should be required to explain how their training will align with the business operations, and there are only two factors they need to consider: Will this training add value (defined by the MI as a combination of output, cost, revenue and quality) or will it reduce any risk factor? All training that fails to satisfy either of these two clear criteria is, by definition, unfocused and potentially worthless expenditure.

Human capital disclosure should prove to be the best of both worlds if you handle it carefully. It shows respect to the regulators, in their legitimate efforts to maintain a level playing field for legal competition while not being swayed by outmoded management conventions in finance and HR.

So, use this opportunity now to set an example of good governance. Embrace the advent of meaningful human capital disclosure with better metrics. Your shareholders and employees will be very grateful for the value it creates.

Paul Kearns is chair of the Maturity Institute.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • MEPs protest over EU sustainable corporate governance measures
    June 25, 2021
    EU flag

    Members of the European Parliament have written to commissioners amid fears that key measures in the legislation will be watered down.

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • ESG legislation: What are the FRC proposals?
    August 17, 2022
    FRC proposals sustainability ESG

    The FRC has set out its plans to help integrate sustainability into corporate governance, reporting and audit reforms.

  • US regulator to vote on new climate disclosure rules
    March 5, 2024
    US climate disclosure

    The level of materiality in the new regulations from the Securities and Exchange Commission remains to be seen.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap