Skip to content

7 December, 2023

Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • workers on boards

      ‘Workers on boards’ idea is back on the table

      European-style two-tier board system may help to end stagnation in the UK, reports the Resolution...

    • AI catastrophe Avoiding AI catastrophe is ‘beyond corporate governance’

      It is ‘inevitable’ that the risks from artificial intelligence require public governance, according to a...

    • sustainability Where next for sustainability?

      An expert panel discussed their view of global trends for the business world in Board...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • AI priorities

      AI priorities for the board

      To reap the benefits of artificial intelligence, boards will need to work on their organisational...

    • purpose statement

      On purpose: crafting an authentic statement

      Purpose statements define how organisations align purpose and people. Here’s how to make a statement...

    • first-time CFO

      How to succeed as a first-time CFO

      The remit and responsibilities of the chief financial officer have changed, which can seem daunting...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uk corporate governance

      Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up

      The LSE’s response to the government’s panicky U-turn on governance regulation is not helpful to...

    • faith in the UK Audit reform is essential to restore faith in the UK

      When it comes to understanding what attracts investors to a capital market, the London Stock...

    • U-turn on audit reform An uncomfortable U-turn on audit reform

      The government’s bonfire of the regulations expected for audit reform creates a source of uncertainty...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • sustainability Where next for sustainability?

      An expert panel discussed their view of global trends for the business world in Board...

    • reporting elements Boards urged to retain ‘beneficial’ reporting elements

      Although the government cancelled the requirement, resilience disclosures ‘cannot be wasted effort’, says senior auditco...

    • energy transition Collaboration is key to UK energy transition

      Communication, innovation and engagement are needed for the move to net zero, an expert panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • gender diversity study Academics criticise BlackRock gender diversity research

      Its methodology came under fire, with some critics also pointing out it was wrong to...

    • diversity of thought How to boost diversity of thought

      Companies benefit from diverse workforces, but also from having the input of different opinions and...

    • minority NED Number of minority NEDs drops

      Although there is some progress in diversity in other board roles, research suggests that boards...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Risk Map: Top Risks 2024

      Control Risks' Top Risks for 2024 cut across the geopolitical, security, operational, regulatory, and cyber/digital...

    • A Director’s Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

      An internal investigation must be handled meticulously to avoid legal exposure, regulatory or criminal prosecution...

    • Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023 cover

      Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023

      The 2023 UK Spencer Stuart Board Index is a review of board composition and governance...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Human capital disclosure – resist, comply or exploit?

by Paul Kearns on August 1, 2017

Efforts to improve global reporting on human capital management represents a major shift in corporate governance, and offers companies a competitive advantage that no board should ignore.

Image: Blueguy, Shutterstock

On 6 July 2017, the Human Capital Management Coalition (“the Coalition”), a group of 25 asset owners representing more than $2.8trn in assets, petitioned the US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) to change its rules requiring company reporting to “disclose information about their human capital management policies, practices and performance”.

The Coalition is seeking these disclosures because it is convinced that they are material to their investments; any board would be delinquent if it failed to investigate further.

The implications of this development are far-reaching, and a well-conceived response is required if you are to avoid any unwanted repercussions. The Maturity Institute’s comment to the SEC has already been posted and should be useful in helping you to formulate your response.

Of course, your preferred option might be to ignore the petition, especially if your company does not fall within the SEC’s jurisdiction. Such a stance is unlikely to help though. This petition is not the only initiative on human capital reporting. The ISO (International Organization for Standardization) supports the petition, as part of improving global HR standards and, in the UK, ShareAction’s Workforce Disclosure Initiative, backed by 79 investment bodies, has already landed on the desks of the FTSE100.

If you want such activity to add value, rather than add further “box-ticking” to your bureaucracy, you should be proactive and take control of the agenda. The Coalition is seeking these disclosures because it is convinced that they are material to their investments; any board would be delinquent if it failed to investigate further.

Competitive advantage

When you understand the full implications of human capital disclosure you will begin to realise that it represents the most significant shift in corporate governance in your lifetime and a tremendous competitive advantage if you do it right.

Your first advantage comes when you realise that the SEC, the Coalition, the ISO and ShareAction have no expertise in the field of human capital measurement. For example, the petition asks for “specific rules-based disclosures such as the amount spent on employee training in the past year” (page 27). You might see nothing untoward in this apparently innocuous data and you probably collect it already.

Talking about people as your “greatest asset” is one thing; providing evidence that you realise its value is another.

A mature, human capital analyst, however, views it in a totally different light. They regard it as throwing money at training without any evidence of value to show for it. It implies you employ people who like going on courses without taking any accountability for the outcome. Ill-conceived human capital metrics can unwittingly send all the wrong signals.

Talking about people as your “greatest asset” is one thing; providing evidence that you realise its value is another. The requirement to treat people as valuable capital is already disrupting the conventions of management.

Human capital value

Ask yourself where human capital value is shown in your company accounts today: it is nowhere to be seen, because the conventional training your chief financial officer (CFO) received only measures people in terms of their cost. Any professional CFO will quietly admit as much.

In fact, it is the accounting bodies signed up to the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), based at the ACCA HQ in London, which is promoting a new “integrated reporting framework” to incorporate human capital—even though they have yet to produce convincing measures.

“People as cost” has always been a fundamental flaw in accounting theory, and “people risk” continues to be a huge blind spot in audit practice.

“People as cost” has always been a fundamental flaw in accounting theory, and “people risk” continues to be a huge blind spot in audit practice. This is why annual reports have so little to say about the value of employees, and any references to people being your “greatest asset” are likely to ring hollow, even if they are genuinely heartfelt.

People never were an asset and never will be. Better to focus on the value they create today and their potential value for the future. Scrap existing measures of “training hours”: at best, they make you appear like a “benevolent patriarch/matriarch” but from an earlier, antiquated, style of leadership.

Human resources

The person you might reasonably expect would have all the right data, your chief human resources officer, was the one who produced employee numbers and training hours for your last annual report. If he/she has not already earned a place on your board, it is probably because they never provided any evidence of their own value. Before you invite them to your next board meeting you should realise that they face the same predicament as the accountants. Their biggest professional body, the SHRM (the American Society for Human Resource Management), signally failed to rise to their own challenge of setting international standards for “investor metrics”, under the auspices of ISO, back in 2012.

This partly explains why the Coalition had to open up their own direct route to the SEC. Moreover, they are particularly concerned with having the most accurate and predictive indicators of long-term performance. They have to be able to spot the missed value opportunities and hidden risks behind the present, very limited, and sometimes misleading information offered.

For example, which bank is most likely to be harbouring the next “rogue trader”? How confident are you that the next scandal or crisis, in terms of people risk, is not just around the corner? Your shareholders and investors need to know today, not after the event.

Human capital indicators

Who knows how the SEC will react to this petition? Will it result in better human capital indicators? At least the Coalition is ahead of the human capital information field when it asks for “… more open-ended principles-based disclosures like how training expenditures are aligned with a changing business strategy” (page 26). This is right on target in value terms, and you would do well to make a simple decision on this today.

All training that fails to satisfy either of these two clear criteria is, by definition, unfocused and potentially worthless expenditure.

You can establish a solid principle, and a workable policy, for every single employee attending any training programme. Before they attend, they should be required to explain how their training will align with the business operations, and there are only two factors they need to consider: Will this training add value (defined by the MI as a combination of output, cost, revenue and quality) or will it reduce any risk factor? All training that fails to satisfy either of these two clear criteria is, by definition, unfocused and potentially worthless expenditure.

Human capital disclosure should prove to be the best of both worlds if you handle it carefully. It shows respect to the regulators, in their legitimate efforts to maintain a level playing field for legal competition while not being swayed by outmoded management conventions in finance and HR.

So, use this opportunity now to set an example of good governance. Embrace the advent of meaningful human capital disclosure with better metrics. Your shareholders and employees will be very grateful for the value it creates.

Paul Kearns is chair of the Maturity Institute.

Related Posts

  • World Economic Forum issues business guidance on human rights
    May 24, 2022
    World Economic Forum logo

    Launched this week at Davos, the WEF report contains five questions for boards to consider regarding their conduct towards stakeholders.

  • Board focus is essential to improving human rights
    November 22, 2022
    human rights benchmark

    Companies that take human rights due diligence seriously tend to lead on the issue from the top, finds global benchmarking report.

  • Pressure renewed for human rights due diligence
    August 31, 2022
    Child labourer breaking rocks

    New poll reveals public backing for laws forcing companies to head off and weed out human rights and environmental abuses.

  • Companies protest delay in EU human rights due diligence legislation
    February 9, 2022
    EU flag

    Companies including Ikea, Danone and Aviva Investors have signed a letter calling on the EU to accelerate its work on human rights proposals.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, corporate reporting, human capital disclosure, Human Capital Management Coalition, human resources, IIRC, Integrated Reporting, ISO, Maturity Institute, ShareAction, US SEC

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us





Most Popular

  • Sustainability governance is on the rise
  • Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up
  • Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to future-proof your board

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|

Copyright © 2023 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap