Skip to content

13 June, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • public markets

      How can we boost public markets?

      Growing companies need adequate liquidity, together with smart regulation and corporate governance that is not...

    • global disruption

      5 essential tenets for coping with global disruption

      With global geopolitical tensions on an unprecedented scale, disrupting markets and data, how can governance...

    • crisis pattern

      How to avoid reputational pitfalls

      There are patterns to business crises, meaning boards can anticipate reputation threats across the stages...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • Warren Buffett

      CEO succession: what boards can learn from Warren Buffett

      The billionaire investor is handing the reins to Greg Abel, after a long, strategic succession...

    • gender pay gap Act now to close the gender pay gap

      This month, it is 55 years since the Equal Pay Act, yet pay inequality persists....

    • leadership on AI How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • ACCA sustainability reporting 2025 cover

      Sustainability reporting: risk and materiality 2025

      ACCA’s sustainability guide takes a practical approach to helping businesses with sustainability reporting.

    • Cybercrime Trends 2025 cover

      Cybercrime Trends 2025

      SoSafe’s report breaks down what’s shaping cybercrime in 2025, outlining six trends, including AI and...

    • UK Stewardship Code 2026 cover

      The UK Stewardship Code 2026

      The UK Stewardship Code 2026 is the FRC’s update of the 2020 edition of the...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Facebook creates oversight board to judge complaints about content

by Gavin Hinks on September 18, 2019

The independent board will seek to provide a detached application of Facebook’s ethical standards to improve the governance of social media content.

Facebook, social media governance

Image: Alexandra Popova/Shutterstock

Under pressure to deal with complaints about the nature of extreme content that finds its way onto Facebook, the social media giant this week announced an answer: an innovation in governance.

Facebook will establish an external independent board of wise men and women to adjudicate on complaints about content. Funded by a trust, the board will come into being in the next months and will seek to provide a detached application of the networking site’s ethical standards.

The move comes after a wave of scandals involving the site and its use for spreading “fake news”, as well as its management of user information.

Board members will constitute “panels” to sit in judgement on cases, with the full board making “binding decisions” on specific items of content.

Mark Zuckerberg, the site’s founder, chief executive and chair, said in a statement: “The board will be an advocate for our community—supporting people’s right to free expression, and making sure we fulfill our responsibility to keep people safe.

“As an independent organisation, we hope it gives people confidence that their views will be heard, and that Facebook doesn’t have the ultimate power over their expression.

“Just as our board of directors keeps Facebook accountable to our shareholders, we believe the oversight board can do the same for our community.”

Extreme content

The move, foreshadowed by Zuckerberg earlier this year, comes as all social media platforms grapple with maintaining a stance on freedom of speech while at the same time managing extreme content published on their sites.

Dealing with the governance of social media content is not an easy process. In April Google announced it was shutting down its own ethics board after controversy emerged over the appointment of key members. Google said it would “go back to the drawing board” in developing its ethical approach to issues such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and facial recognition.

This week’s move from Facebook received a positive response in some quarters. Responding to Facebook’s pledge to publicly explain why it will or won’t implement an oversight board decision, Kate Klonick, a professor at St John’s university Law School, told Bloomberg news it was a “huge deal” and constituted “probably the most accountable we’ve ever seen Facebook”.

Others pointed to obstacles that could soon be confronting the new board. Philippa Foster Back, director of the Institute of Business Ethics, said the Facebook oversight board raised two areas of concern.

“The first is the timeliness of the panel reviewing cases, when the platform operates real time, and the second is relying on the judgement of the panel members which might not preclude bias,” she said.

Timeliness could be a critical issue during election campaigns which typically run over short time frames and might require quick decision over material considered either misleading or extreme.

But Foster Back also pointed out that public trust in social media remains at comparatively low levels and could form a big issue undermining the board’s work. Edelman’s 2019 Trust Barometer revealed this year that trust in social media in both Europe and North America stood at just 34%. Meanwhile, trust in European traditional media was at 60% and in North America at 65%. Overall, 73% of those polled said they worried bout false information or fake news being used as a weapon.

“These statistics make for a potentially high level of scepticism towards the Facebook initiative, particularly on the back of Google’s failure with their introduction of an Ethics Council,” said Foster Back.

‘User democracy’

Elsewhere, other have already argued that a “Supreme Court” style approach, while a step in the right direction, might not restore public faith in Facebook.

According to Henning Meyer, a research associate at the London School of Economics and director of consultancy New Global Strategy, Facebook not only needs to take judgements outside its existing structures but also implement “user democracy” to help develop its own rules.

In a blog post in June, Meyer said the “Supreme Court” approach takes decisions away from the company, creates accountability and transparency and ensures decisions were not determined by commercial interests.

But it would “fall short” because of doubts over the legitimacy of Facebook’s rules. “What counts is what the users consider to be legitimate,” Meyer said.

He concluded: “In a period in which private sector companies exercise public functions, the transfer of more elements of democratic statehood into the corporate governance of companies could be a suitable instrument for tackling their problems of legitimacy.”

That would be a radical step for any social media outfit, where founders have become notorious for attempting to retain as much control over their organisations as possible.

But Henning may be right and organisations like Facebook may be involved in a process of governance evolution. Other platforms are yet to show their hands over the governance of content, despite political and public pressure. Social media companies are still grappling with the ethical questions raised by their services. They may follow Facebook’s example, they may innovate further.

Read Facebook’s full statement here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Let AI pick up the board’s admin only, experts advise
    October 13, 2022
    AI governance

    It may be some way off yet, but governance by robots is coming and directors need to be ready, according to new research.

  • Could ChatGPT technology join the board?
    March 23, 2023
    ChatGPT technology

    Although governance may stop artificial intelligence replacing anyone on the board today, AI may soon prove to be a useful boardroom tool.

  • Pandemic 'opened door' to the use of new boardroom technology
    August 27, 2021
    Man working remotely

    A recent webinar hosted by Board Agenda and Diligent explored the ways boards are using technology to enhance effectiveness.

  • Changes to company law would enable use of ‘robot directors’
    August 5, 2021
    Robot director in suit

    Researchers say that the use of artificial intelligence on boards “is possible with minor reconsiderations to the current legislation".

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap