Skip to content

30 May, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ESG battle

      ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

    • McDonald's antibiotics News round-up: this week in governance

      Investors challenge McDonald’s over antibiotic use; Norges Bank’s ESG push criticised; diversity box-ticking; revolt at...

    • boost audit Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls

      UK watchdog’s proposals include giving audit committees greater reporting responsibilities and addressing ‘overboarding’.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

How the Google walkout was no ordinary employee protest

by Gavin Hinks on November 5, 2018

Google staff staged a walkout in their thousands over the handling of sexual misconduct cases, possibly one of the first such actions where highly paid workers protested over company values.

Google, tech acquisitions

Image: Sundry Photography/Shutterstock

On Thursday last week, using Google was no different from any other day. You typed in your search term and up came the results.

However, a quick search on the browser would also reveal that many of the company’s staff were not at their desks executing amazing technology tricks, but on a planned walkout protesting over management’s treatment of three executives in relation to sexual misconduct allegations. One of the managers received a $90m exit package.

The news first appeared in the New York Times, but in the age of #MeToo, staff were incensed. It is estimated that around 20,000 Google workers participated in the walkout, around 20% of the company’s total workforce based in 50 cities around the world. Employee activism looked as if it had reached a peak. Or had it?

The walkout came as the latest event in which Google employees have protested, not over pay and conditions, but over their company’s values.

While the walkout garnered news headlines around the world, and may have given jitters to company bosses globally over the possibility of a growing trend of employee action, Google’s events had a special context.

Indeed, the walkout came as the latest event in which Google employees have protested, not over pay and conditions, but over their company’s values.

Google has this year developed a record of lobbying. In August, chief executive Sundar Pichai was forced to offer reassurances over the possibility of relaunching the search engine in China. A staff petition had circulated Alphabet, Google’s parent company, calling for more transparency over decision-making and greater representation of “rank and file” staff.

Then in early October Google announced it would withdraw from bidding for a defence department contract, following a decision that it would be in breach of company principles. At the beginning of the year staff protested internally over supplying the Pentagon with facial recognition software. In that instance Google decided it would not renew a contract with the military.

It seems Google’s well-paid tech wizards are less interested in higher pay and better working conditions (the company has made great play of being leaders in both) than ensuring the company lives up to its own values.

Silicon Valley disputes

According to Melanie Simms, a professor of work and employment at the University of Glasgow, Google’s labour relations is unrelated to many industrial disputes that have recently made the news, including strikes at Amazon depots across Europe, and those by Uber Eats and Deliveroo workers for better pay and conditions.

However, what they do have in common is being part of the wave of Silicon Valley companies going global and attempting to manage labour relations in a way that suits their business models. She says tech companies have, in general, made strenuous efforts to communicate to staff using ways that avoid going through unions.

As these new models mature, tensions are emerging as staff find that their grievances cannot be answered by the communication modes chosen by managers.

But as these new models mature, tensions are emerging as staff find that their grievances cannot be answered by the communication modes chosen by managers. “There’s always a point that staff realise they can achieve more collectively than they can as individuals,” says Simms.

Uber and Deliveroo have particular labour relations issues borne out of the self employment models they rely upon for frontline workers, and the problems inherent in these models have been coming home to roost. While some have resulted in courtroom conflicts, others are inevitably turning into strike action. “What I think we can say is that in the experiments with new ways of working, the downsides are increasingly obvious. And one response is to complain collectively,” adds Simms.

This is particularly true at a time of low wage growth, says Simms, which typically produces more complaints from workers.

Of course, workers who are self-employed face obstacles to becoming organised. They tend not to work in a single location which enables communications and allows access for organisers. New unions are springing up, however, to serve their needs, such as the Independent Workers of Great Britain.

Gig economy

Elsewhere, the government has attempted to get a grip on regulating the so-called gig economy. A report out in July made a series of recommendations to the government in an attempt to close down the legal “no man’s land” in which such workers are employed. One step was to create a new legal status: “dependent contractor”, which would allow gig economy workers to access holiday and sick pay, as well as other benefits.

But this a far cry from the issues at Google, which revolve much more around the kind of company its employees thought they were working in.

Michael Etter, a lecturer at King’s College London, notes that events at Google are unusual and observes that this may be one of the first examples of “highly paid” employees taking action against an employer over a point of principle.

The walkout may actually do Google some good because it suggests its employees stand up for doing the right thing…

In an article for The Conversation, he even argues that the walkout may actually do Google some good because it suggests its employees stand up for doing the right thing, while for consumers it demonstrates that a tech-driven organisation that occasionally encounters controversy over its services has a human face. This would help set the company “apart from Silicon Valley’s reputation for sexual abuse and gender discrimination,” he says.

However, this may depend on how management responds to employee demands. When they protested, organisers asked Google’s leaders for improved transparency in the reporting and handling of sexual misconduct cases; an “end to pay and opportunity inequality”; and for an elevation in the status of the company’s chief diversity officer.

In response, Pichai signalled he was listening. In an interview with The New York Times he conceded the company had not lived up to “our expectations”. He offered support to the workers on the walkout and made plain he acknowledged their complaint.

However, Alphabet’s board, chaired by John L. Hennessy, might do well to pay careful attention. As Michael Etter says, the worker demands have “a lot to do with corporate governance.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Ann-marie Murphy joins The Gym Group board
    April 22, 2022
    The Gym Group logo

    Murphy joined the company in April 2018 as director of people and development, and became chief operating officer earlier this year.

  • Companies must put equality at the heart of the race to zero
    November 10, 2021
    Trees reflected in buildings

    Singular pursuit of net-zero by 2050 could exacerbate inequality and derail our chances of a climate-resilient future.

  • The storm before the calm: how boards can make better decisions
    October 18, 2021
    Businessman looking at stormy sky

    Behind every apparently calm surface lies a mass of board member interests, beliefs and emotions. How these conflicts can be managed?

  • 'The most important topic we discuss is the safety of our people'
    March 4, 2022
    Ukraine energy company DTEK logo

    Ukrainian firms are facing huge operational challenges, as well as responsibilities to their employees and the economy of their country.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Alphabet, employee action, gig economy, Google, John L. Hennessy, Melanie Simms, Michael Etter, sexual misconduct, Silicon Valley, Sundar Pichai, worker rights

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|