Are directors courting legal action by keeping quiet on climate risk?
In Australia recently, shareholders filed legal action against Commonwealth Bank—it had allegedly failed to disclose climate risk accurately. Could this be the first of many such cases? How should directors report on climate change risks in the face of an uncertain future?
Photo: Chrisjtse, Flickr.
In the UK, as in many other countries, directors are legally required to consider material financial risks facing their business, and to report these risks in their corporate disclosures. This can often include the risks posed by climate change—which, after all, can be a material risk for business like any other.
The case against Commonwealth Bank was dropped after the bank released new reporting that recognised climate change as a financial risk. But many directors are still exposing themselves to liability by remaining tight-lipped: it has just been revealed that almost two-thirds of FTSE 100 companies are not including climate risk in
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
The great IT meltdown
There is little indication that banks are giving IT the kind of attention it undoubtedly needs.
-
Balancing act: stock exchanges and dual-class shares
As stock exchanges allow dual-class shares in a bid to attract new listings, investors worry they that represent a “watering down” of listing requirements.
-
World of uncertainty for governance as need for change intensifies
A spate of reports indicate that this is far from being a settled time for governance. In fact, the agitation for change in governance is as dynamic as demands for change in politics and economics.
