Too many ESG measures lead to reporting fatigue
Environment, social and governance have become critical issues in the way investors judge companies, but corporates face too many ESG measures suffering from too little standardisation.
Image: Shutterstock
Given the importance of sustainability to current business models, it is no surprise that those measures which rate company performance on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues have become highly influential.
But we now have scores of methods and providers. For my research, I investigated 218 different ESG initiatives and interviewed 45 asset owners, asset managers and companies in the Netherlands, the UK and Germany. I found that reporting fatigue at company level is a substantial cost that is often overlooked. What makes matters worse is the lack of convergence of ESG ratings and rankings.
Although this industry can be usefu
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
Changes to company constitutions ‘could allow use of AI on the board’
While a number of directors' tasks could be “augmented”—or entirely substituted—by the use of AI, questions remain over liability.
-
Survey launches to reveal boardroom risk thinking
Companies are operating in a world of unprecedented risk. But do boards have the skills to manage these risks—and are they prepared for the future?
-
Larry Fink: companies must make a ‘positive contribution’ to society
Larry Fink, chief executive of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, says it will step up its engagement with boards in an effort to forge a "new model of shareholder engagement".
