Skip to content

24 May, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • UK Corporate Governance Code

      Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • gender pay gap

      Act now to close the gender pay gap

      This month, it is 55 years since the Equal Pay Act, yet pay inequality persists....

    • monitor sustainability

      How to equip the auditco to monitor sustainability

      The board’s expanding remit to oversee non-financial reporting calls for significant reforms, with stakeholder trust...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • gender pay gap

      Act now to close the gender pay gap

      This month, it is 55 years since the Equal Pay Act, yet pay inequality persists....

    • leadership on AI How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • Route to the top 2025

      Route to the Top 2025

      Heidrick & Struggles’ report draws on an analysis of the profiles of the 1,232 CEOs...

    • Director Reference Guide: Fostering the board-CEO relationship

      This Board Agenda Director Reference Guide on fostering the board-CEO relationship provides practical advice to...

    • Forvis Mazars AI 2025

      Performance Pulse: Are UK businesses prepared for AI?

      Forvis Mazars measured the AI preparedness of more than 300 UK businesses: 97% say they're...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Non-execs need the right skills for effective integrated reporting

by Carol Adams

Integrated reporting is gaining in popularity, but it needs the right skills among non-executives if their credibility is to be enforced, writes Prof. Carol Adams, professor of accounting at Durham University.

integrated thinking, integrated reporting

Image: Shutterstock

It is a clear expectation that board members are financially literate and any board using a skills matrix will encapsulate this in some way. But what about an understanding of value beyond profit? Or of the broader risks and opportunities that lead to, or threaten, value creation?

Integrated reports are designed to convey to investors and other readers information about the short, medium and, most importantly, the long-term value created by an organisation and the process by which that is achieved. Value is much more broadly defined than profit, or financial gain, recognising that an increasingly smaller part of a company’s value can be measured in financial terms and included on its balance sheet.

Creating value in the long term requires an understanding of sustainable development issues. Boards should ask questions regarding the reliability of water and energy supply, if needed for manufacturing when they set up a new site; or consider whether social unrest due to inequality in a particular area might make it a risky place in which to do business.

Creating value in the long term requires an understanding of sustainable development issues.

But very few boards would include this skill on their skills matrix. When I interviewed non-executive directors of some of the largest companies in the world, one talked about their first board meeting in connection with their integrated report:

“The first meeting actually changed my whole attitude, which scared me. Scared is not a bad thing…scared in the right sense that it actually triggers your mind into action…”

This interviewee went on to elaborate further how thinking about value creation in terms broader than financial statements changed his thinking about how to do business, focusing more on the long term and thinking about opportunities and risks. He was not alone in these sentiments—the point being that the ability to acknowledge the wider meaning of value is an important skill, a need to which boards are poorly attuned.

Following the Framework

This lack of skills and even awareness of their necessity has implications for the quality of board engagement with the integrated reporting process. Yet, the current version of the International <IR> Framework requires their involvement.

Further, conducting a good strategic review in the UK (or OFR in Australia, for example) requires these skills. Following the <IR> framework helps boards and management understand how they create value and develop the integrated thinking required to prepare a good strategic review.

Apart from having the skills required to think holistically about risks and opportunities and their implications for long-term value creation, there are other things boards can do to ensure the integrity of their integrated reports. Incidentally, it’s worth noting that a couple of male board directors interviewed in the same study said women were particularly good at thinking holistically.

The board should be involved at various stages in the process of developing an integrated report, either through an established board sub-committee or an integrated report working group.

Much of the data in these reports is qualitative, and where it is quantitative it is usually non-financial (think customer satisfaction survey results, for example). But that doesn’t mean that organisations can’t put in place rigorous internal control processes to ensure information accuracy. This might be done under the purview of the CFO, whose team have a good understanding of processes to ensure data rigour.

Companies can also get an expert to review their processes or, as I have done, to work with them as they develop their statement on how they create value, articulate their business model, the external factors impacting on their ability to create value and other aspects of the Framework. This role can be seen as that of a “critical friend”, challenging the organisation’s thinking, and helping to bring considered consensus on the main ingredients of the integrated report.

The board should be involved at various stages in the process of developing an integrated report, either through an established board sub-committee or an integrated report working group. The first step in the development of an integrated report should ideally be the value-creation statement, followed by articulation of the business model. The working group should be involved in that, as well as approving proposed content and checking for connectivity in the draft. The whole board should then approve the finished product.

External assurance

Board strategy days are an opportunity to think about value creation in terms of the multiple capitals (human, natural, intellectual, social and relationship, etc.) of integrated reporting and to review the key externalities which create risks and opportunities.

External assurance can add credibility to corporate reporting. In the case of integrated reporting you will need to be very clear about what you want to get out of the exercise—that is, what you want assurance providers to do to add credibility. Assurance of integrated reports, like integrated reporting, is new so you need to specify what you want carefully, rather than get what the assurors want to provide.

The reader of an integrated report surely, as a starting point, wants to know how a company defines value and to whom, and have confidence in that statement.

The reader of an integrated report surely, as a starting point, wants to know how a company defines value and to whom, and have confidence in that statement.

So, one of the most important roles for assurance of an integrated report, beyond the role currently fulfilled by financial audit and sustainability assurance engagements, is to provide users with information which allows an assessment of whether the company concerned is working to maximise value creation according to its own definition.

How is it balancing short, medium and long-term thinking? Is it incorporating all material external factors into its analysis of risk and opportunity to inform strategy? These are important questions to readers of an organisation’s integrated report.

Boards and management might want an assurance engagement to tell them how well the organisation is tracking towards integrated thinking, and what the next steps are that need to be taken to maximise long-term value creation (broadly defined) for all stakeholders.

So in summary, boards can enhance the credibility of integrated reports by:

• having people on the board who understand a broad range of risks, including social and environmental risks;

• including people who can think in an integrated way on the board;

• governing internal controls over non-financial and qualitative data;

• drawing on the skills of experts to guide and critique;

• linking strategy development with the integrated reporting process; and

• engaging external assurors, paying special regard to the scope of the engagement.

Dr Carol Adams PhD CA FAICD is a professor at Durham University Business School, UK, and consults on corporate reporting.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • IoD: Don’t make audit committees accountable for ESG reporting
    September 8, 2023
    IoD governance

    The Institute of Directors says the FRC proposal on board governance means ‘lines of accountability will be blurred’.

  • FRC says climate disclosures are 'failing to meet investor expectations'
    September 11, 2021
    Climate disclosures warning sign

    Review by the UK regulator finds there is "little evidence" that business models and strategy are being influenced by climate considerations.

  • Facebook owner Meta names Tony Xu as board director
    January 18, 2022
    Meta logo and Facebook logo

    Xu is co-founder, chief executive officer and chair of DoorDash, the leading online food delivery company in the US.

  • Jan du Plessis lined up as next chair of the Financial Reporting Council
    January 7, 2022
    BT chair Jan du Plessis

    The appointment of Du Plessis, chair of BT Group and a former chair of Rio Tinto and SABMiller, is subject to parliamentary approval.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Autumn 2017, board skills, Carol Adams, Integrated Reporting, integrated thinking, long term value, non-executive directors, sustainable development, value creation

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap