Skip to content

31 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Facebook’s fail: the ‘story’, the risks and the role of the board

by Stilpon Nestor

Cambridge Analytica harvested the data of 50 million Facebook users to help swing the US presidential election, but amid the trend for corporate governance ‘narratives’, did Facebook’s directors forget the chapter on ethics?

Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, data harvesting, data ethics

Image: AlexandraPopova / Shutterstock.com

One of the arguments that one increasingly hears these days is that corporate governance in the new economy will be all about the “story” of the company, not about its performance or assets. Value will be primarily dependent on the narrative of future growth.

The role of boards in the future will therefore be to weave this story and make it as credible as possible to investors and other resource providers.

Directors are there to kick the story around, to challenge and dent its shiny, futuristic polish.

This argument is partly right. The shareholder value of “growth” companies is not a result of the paltry value of their (tangible or, in the strict accounting sense, intangible) assets. It is very much dependent on the credibility of their growth narrative. Moreover, the present value of this narrative to “new economy” shareholders seems, in itself, much higher than the present value of assets/prospects in other industries.

Even after the Cambridge Analytica breach came to light earlier this year, Facebook traded at more than 10-times sales, as opposed to a factor of slightly more than two, at most, for the broader S&P 500.

However, when it comes to the board this argument is wrong. New economy or not, directors are not there to cheer the executives as they develop their story. They are there to kick the story around, to challenge and dent its shiny, futuristic polish. Their job is to make sure that the strategy reflects the key risks faced by growth companies of the “network” kind, of which Facebook is the prime example.

Data-harvesting fallout

We all witnessed the extraordinary story of Facebook‘s failure to stop Cambridge Analytica from harvesting data from more than 50 million users. As a result of this story, Facebook lost more than 110 billion of its market capitalisation (although it has recently somewhat recovered). The “elephant” risks, whose realisation (or sharply increased likelihood) resulted in this huge shareholder loss, were well known to Facebook.

The first one is a classic legal risk: the company might be sued by some of the 50 million users whose data were stolen and face multibillion-dollar fines as a result.

The second one is a regulatory risk, or in the words of Facebook’s 2016 Annual Report, the risk that “…proposed or new legislation and regulations could … significantly affect our business”.

Last, but not least, there is a classic reputational risk: a perception of loss of the network’s integrity could easily translate into a largely asymmetrical loss of trust on the part of the network’s users, who might switch their allegiance to other competitors.

The consensus view seems to be that the “fail” was management’s fault alone and that the board was effectively irrelevant in overseeing risk or holding management accountable for managing it properly

To use again the language in Facebook’s disclosures “…there (might) be decreases in user sentiment about the quality … of our products or concerns related to privacy and sharing, safety, security, or other factors; we, developers whose products are integrated with our products, or other partners and companies in our industry are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity… If we are unable to maintain or increase our user base and user engagement, our revenue and financial results may be adversely affected.”

Where was the board?

There is something quite remarkable in the reaction to Facebook‘s “epic fail” (as per The Economist). Neither the company, nor the various commentators on its travails, have asked what is almost a cliché question in similar situations: Where was the board? Was it only there to help with the “story” in new economy companies?

The consensus view seems to be that the “fail” was management’s fault alone and that the board was effectively irrelevant in overseeing risk or holding management accountable for managing it properly, two of its key duties in “plain vanilla” companies.

So, let us take a closer look at Facebook’s board. It is an illustrious board of nine individuals, seven of whom are non-executives. These non-executives mostly hail from the new economy. Only one, the lead independent director, Susan Desmond Helman, is not currently a professional investor in the sector.

There is a clear public policy/public interest perspective in every social network and one would think that the ethics that underpin a platform for social interaction would be a prominent concern of the board.

Old-world examples

To use some “old-world” examples, most well-governed mining company boards have established environment and health and safety committees, while more and more banks have established financial risk committees as well as conduct committees.

While at least three Facebook directors could contribute to a discussion from a public policy/public interest perspective, at least on the basis of their CVs, there does not seem to be any committee or other forum which could make use of their expertise and where such discussions could take place.

What is even more striking is the little influence that shareholders, other than the CEO and founder, Mark Zuckerberg, have in the composition and performance of the board. Zuckerberg controls appointments through a special class of shares with enhanced rights.

What is even more striking is the little influence that shareholders, other than the CEO and founder, Mark Zuckerberg, have in the composition and performance of the board.

What’s more, this is a “shareholder-only” company: according to it latest 10-k form, equity consists of almost 90% of the balance sheet. There are precious few bond holders or bank creditors to enforce outside discipline on the company. This fact makes the power of the founder even more glaring.

A partial remedy to this asymmetry could have been a more balanced board with a powerful independent component representing a perspective different to the “story” of the industry. A board forum to oversee the “elephant” risks, informed by ethics and public policy expertise, would also have been very welcome.

Maybe none of this is needed and investors will soon start buying the “story” again, in a wholesale fashion. But maybe not. Maybe it is time for the Facebook “story” board to take a page out of the Uber book before it’s too late…

Stilpon Nestor is managing director, Nestor Advisors, and chairman, AKTIS

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures
    April 22, 2022
    Board risk meeting

    There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

  • Ian Dyson named as new chair of the board at Asos
    October 15, 2021
    ASOS package

    Nick Beighton will be stepping down as CEO of the online fashion retailer, while Jørgen Lindemann joins as non-executive director.

  • A remixed roadmap for the future of board leadership
    October 18, 2021
    Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

    A recent report identifies the need for a new governance model that reflects the changing responsibilities of boards and their leaders.

  • Board effectiveness in the new world of work
    April 21, 2022
    Boardroom at sunrise

    Boards should use this post-pandemic period to reflect and reinvent themselves and their working practices.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board risk oversight, Cambridge Analytica, corporate governance, data ethics, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|