Skip to content

18 June, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • public markets

      How can we boost public markets?

      Growing companies need adequate liquidity, together with smart regulation and corporate governance that is not...

    • global disruption

      5 essential tenets for coping with global disruption

      With global geopolitical tensions on an unprecedented scale, disrupting markets and data, how can governance...

    • crisis pattern

      How to avoid reputational pitfalls

      There are patterns to business crises, meaning boards can anticipate reputation threats across the stages...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • Warren Buffett

      CEO succession: what boards can learn from Warren Buffett

      The billionaire investor is handing the reins to Greg Abel, after a long, strategic succession...

    • gender pay gap Act now to close the gender pay gap

      This month, it is 55 years since the Equal Pay Act, yet pay inequality persists....

    • leadership on AI How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • ACCA sustainability reporting 2025 cover

      Sustainability reporting: risk and materiality 2025

      ACCA’s sustainability guide takes a practical approach to helping businesses with sustainability reporting.

    • Cybercrime Trends 2025 cover

      Cybercrime Trends 2025

      SoSafe’s report breaks down what’s shaping cybercrime in 2025, outlining six trends, including AI and...

    • UK Stewardship Code 2026 cover

      The UK Stewardship Code 2026

      The UK Stewardship Code 2026 is the FRC’s update of the 2020 edition of the...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Facebook’s fail: the ‘story’, the risks and the role of the board

by Stilpon Nestor

Cambridge Analytica harvested the data of 50 million Facebook users to help swing the US presidential election, but amid the trend for corporate governance ‘narratives’, did Facebook’s directors forget the chapter on ethics?

Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, data harvesting, data ethics

Image: AlexandraPopova / Shutterstock.com

One of the arguments that one increasingly hears these days is that corporate governance in the new economy will be all about the “story” of the company, not about its performance or assets. Value will be primarily dependent on the narrative of future growth.

The role of boards in the future will therefore be to weave this story and make it as credible as possible to investors and other resource providers.

Directors are there to kick the story around, to challenge and dent its shiny, futuristic polish.

This argument is partly right. The shareholder value of “growth” companies is not a result of the paltry value of their (tangible or, in the strict accounting sense, intangible) assets. It is very much dependent on the credibility of their growth narrative. Moreover, the present value of this narrative to “new economy” shareholders seems, in itself, much higher than the present value of assets/prospects in other industries.

Even after the Cambridge Analytica breach came to light earlier this year, Facebook traded at more than 10-times sales, as opposed to a factor of slightly more than two, at most, for the broader S&P 500.

However, when it comes to the board this argument is wrong. New economy or not, directors are not there to cheer the executives as they develop their story. They are there to kick the story around, to challenge and dent its shiny, futuristic polish. Their job is to make sure that the strategy reflects the key risks faced by growth companies of the “network” kind, of which Facebook is the prime example.

Data-harvesting fallout

We all witnessed the extraordinary story of Facebook‘s failure to stop Cambridge Analytica from harvesting data from more than 50 million users. As a result of this story, Facebook lost more than 110 billion of its market capitalisation (although it has recently somewhat recovered). The “elephant” risks, whose realisation (or sharply increased likelihood) resulted in this huge shareholder loss, were well known to Facebook.

The first one is a classic legal risk: the company might be sued by some of the 50 million users whose data were stolen and face multibillion-dollar fines as a result.

The second one is a regulatory risk, or in the words of Facebook’s 2016 Annual Report, the risk that “…proposed or new legislation and regulations could … significantly affect our business”.

Last, but not least, there is a classic reputational risk: a perception of loss of the network’s integrity could easily translate into a largely asymmetrical loss of trust on the part of the network’s users, who might switch their allegiance to other competitors.

The consensus view seems to be that the “fail” was management’s fault alone and that the board was effectively irrelevant in overseeing risk or holding management accountable for managing it properly

To use again the language in Facebook’s disclosures “…there (might) be decreases in user sentiment about the quality … of our products or concerns related to privacy and sharing, safety, security, or other factors; we, developers whose products are integrated with our products, or other partners and companies in our industry are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity… If we are unable to maintain or increase our user base and user engagement, our revenue and financial results may be adversely affected.”

Where was the board?

There is something quite remarkable in the reaction to Facebook‘s “epic fail” (as per The Economist). Neither the company, nor the various commentators on its travails, have asked what is almost a cliché question in similar situations: Where was the board? Was it only there to help with the “story” in new economy companies?

The consensus view seems to be that the “fail” was management’s fault alone and that the board was effectively irrelevant in overseeing risk or holding management accountable for managing it properly, two of its key duties in “plain vanilla” companies.

So, let us take a closer look at Facebook’s board. It is an illustrious board of nine individuals, seven of whom are non-executives. These non-executives mostly hail from the new economy. Only one, the lead independent director, Susan Desmond Helman, is not currently a professional investor in the sector.

There is a clear public policy/public interest perspective in every social network and one would think that the ethics that underpin a platform for social interaction would be a prominent concern of the board.

Old-world examples

To use some “old-world” examples, most well-governed mining company boards have established environment and health and safety committees, while more and more banks have established financial risk committees as well as conduct committees.

While at least three Facebook directors could contribute to a discussion from a public policy/public interest perspective, at least on the basis of their CVs, there does not seem to be any committee or other forum which could make use of their expertise and where such discussions could take place.

What is even more striking is the little influence that shareholders, other than the CEO and founder, Mark Zuckerberg, have in the composition and performance of the board. Zuckerberg controls appointments through a special class of shares with enhanced rights.

What is even more striking is the little influence that shareholders, other than the CEO and founder, Mark Zuckerberg, have in the composition and performance of the board.

What’s more, this is a “shareholder-only” company: according to it latest 10-k form, equity consists of almost 90% of the balance sheet. There are precious few bond holders or bank creditors to enforce outside discipline on the company. This fact makes the power of the founder even more glaring.

A partial remedy to this asymmetry could have been a more balanced board with a powerful independent component representing a perspective different to the “story” of the industry. A board forum to oversee the “elephant” risks, informed by ethics and public policy expertise, would also have been very welcome.

Maybe none of this is needed and investors will soon start buying the “story” again, in a wholesale fashion. But maybe not. Maybe it is time for the Facebook “story” board to take a page out of the Uber book before it’s too late…

Stilpon Nestor is managing director, Nestor Advisors, and chairman, AKTIS

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Succession planning can calm the market
    October 20, 2022
    CEO succession

    When a good CEO announces their departure, revealing a succession plan eases the pain in more ways than one, finds research.

  • Boards urged to establish an ethical culture
    October 3, 2023
    ethical culture

    The Institute of Business Ethics is sending a clear message to the many FTSE 350 companies that lack an accessible ethics code.

  • Governance must not stand in the way of innovation
    October 27, 2022
    governance and innovation

    As regulation increases, innovation suffers—but a diverse, savvy board can promote a corporate culture open to change.

  • Review reveals leadership failure at PwC Australia
    September 28, 2023
    pwc australia

    Investigation into confidentiality leak finds ‘excessive’ power at the top and says poor decisions added to initial wrongdoing.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap