Skip to content

8 February, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • CEO legacy

      Long-standing CEOs can leave a legacy of trouble for boards

      Performance and productivity can suffer after a long-tenured chief executive leaves the company, researchers find.

    • cost-of-living crisis Aviva highlights cost-of-living crisis

      Fund calls for ‘mindful’ pay ratios, showing executive pay is now firmly an issue for...

    • diversity talent pipeline News round-up: this week in governance

      Target diversity early; directors job market 'ossified'; US extends duty of oversight; 'kindness bias' hinders...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • mission zero

      Can the UK achieve net zero by 2050?

      To gain economic benefits, UK businesses will need resilient and flexible supply chains to provide...

    • governance recession

      What use is governance in a recession?

      Companies seeking competitive advantage in uncertain times will find that effective governance allows much sharper...

    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO legacy Long-standing CEOs can leave a legacy of trouble for boards

      Performance and productivity can suffer after a long-tenured chief executive leaves the company, researchers find.

    • diversity talent pipeline News round-up: this week in governance

      Target diversity early; directors job market 'ossified'; US extends duty of oversight; 'kindness bias' hinders...

    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Unilever’s takeover rejection becomes a turning point

by Andrew Cave on August 8, 2017

Unilever this year defeated a takeover bid from American rival Kraft. But the episode has prompted questions over the Anglo-Dutch group’s ability to maintain its much-envied sustainable business model.

Unilever, cleaning products, household goods, consumer goods

Image: Shutterstock

“Don’t talk, but clean.” Unilever chief executive Paul Polman likes to quote this apparently well-known Dutch proverb to explain how his company headed off an opportunistic $143bn takeover approach from American groceries giant Kraft Heinz in February.

Maybe there’s something lost in translation. Polman admitted as much after the event, settling on “let’s just deliver” as his battle cry and crediting his “Calvinist Dutch approach” for allowing the company’s actions to do the talking.

It’s not what was expected from a man best-known for his passionate communication of the importance of sustainable development and a sense of purpose in business. Then again, Polman did act with uncommon speed to derail this bid that never was. He is said to have gathered his advisers, made an impassioned speech about the need to defend Unilever, and asked them to confirm their allegiance to him and the company.

Dutch companies are more consensual and less prone to shareholder activism than their Anglo-Saxon cousins.

He then wrote directly to Kraft Heinz’s two largest shareholders—US investor Warren Buffett and Brazilian private equity firm 3G Capital—to inform them that an offer would not have the support of the Unilever board and that the Anglo-Dutch company would use every tool at its disposal to fend it off.

Kraft Heinz duly announced that it was withdrawing its offer “amicably”—just 48 hours after admitting its interest in the consumer goods manufacturer.

For all the contrasts drawn between the short-term profiteering of 3G’s leader Jorge Lemann, and Polman’s commitment to long-term sustainable outcomes, Unilever’s bid defence still seems to have been wrapped in the complexities of Dutch corporate culture.

Dutch companies are more consensual and less prone to shareholder activism than their Anglo-Saxon cousins, while foreign takeovers in the Netherlands are protected against by “poison pills”, and dual management and supervisory board structures.

This is a powerful combination that also derailed this year’s $29.5bn attempt by US coatings group PPG Industries to buy Dulux paint-maker AkzoNobel.

Calling it quits

Professor John Colley, of Warwick Business School, an expert in international mergers and acquisitions, says: “Unilever and PPG both clearly took the view that they were not only up against intransigent boards … but also Dutch courts and the government. A hostile takeover bid against such opposition was likely to be both expensive and protracted.

“And as the US dollar declined against the euro, the takeovers became more expensive too.”

Kraft Heinz’s official statement on the failed bid agrees with at least the first part of this. “Kraft Heinz’s interest was made public at an extremely early stage,” says company spokesman Michael Mullen.

“Our intention was to proceed on a friendly basis but it was made clear that Unilever did not wish to pursue a transaction. It is best to step away early so both companies can focus on their own independent plans to generate value.”

But what does Unilever’s Dutch defence mean for this Anglo-Dutch business, and will it change the terms of any future takeover attempts of British companies?

Long relationship

Anglo-Dutch business relations have a mixed track record dating back 400 years, to the time when the English and Dutch set up rival East India companies within 15 months of each other.

Then, in 1826, a British foreign minister sent his country’s ambassador in The Hague a coded message stating that: “In matters of commerce the fault of the Dutch is offering too little and asking too much.”

Some 80 years later, Royal Dutch Shell was created. Then came Unilever, born from a 1930 merger of Margarine Unie of the Netherlands with Britain’s Lever Brothers.

[Polman] has put purpose at the heart of Unilever, making public statements on human rights, violence and discrimination against women, sustainable development and infrastructure, and climate change.

Publisher Reed-Elsevier arrived via a merger in 1996, while British Steel and Hoogovens united as Corus in 1999, the same year that Reckitt & Colman combined with Dutch household products group Benckiser to form Reckitt Benckiser.

Only the latter, which swiftly integrated into a single company, has been an unqualified success. The rest had a legacy of joint boards, joint chairmen or, even worse, joint CEOs. Shell finally demerged in 2005. Unilever, for example, still has two parents, Unilever NV and Unilever plc, which operated with two chairmen until 2005.

The companies’ boards are the same and Dutchman Marijn Dekkers now chairs each, with the firms and their subsidiaries operating as near as possible as a single economic entity, while remaining distinct corporations with their own shareholders and stock exchange listings.

Unilever net profit margins
Source: Unilever

However, while Unilever’s share price underperformed until the bid, most recent grumbles about the group were aimed not at its cumbersome structure, but at the commitment that Polman has made to generating long-term sustainability, rather than pure shareholder value.

One of his early actions was to abandon Unilever’s quarterly reporting of its financial results on the basis that it was too short-termist. He moved the employee share scheme’s goalposts from three to five years for the same reason.

For Polman, the driving force is alignment with customers, with genuine shareholder returns produced when the company understands its consumers intimately and reflects their concerns by operating responsible, purpose-driven brands.

He has put purpose at the heart of Unilever, making public statements on human rights, violence and discrimination against women, sustainable development and infrastructure, and climate change.

Polman claims that the Unilever brands that meet the highest standards for social and environmental impact are growing 40% faster than the group’s other products.

A near-death experience

Before the Kraft Heinz approach, this philosophy was coming under attack, with some shareholders anxious for more growth.

Ironically the bid played into Polman’s hands, with the American company easily caricatured as displaying the opposite kind of capitalism to Unilever’s.

In an open letter to Polman published in March, Richard Buxton, chief executive of Old Mutual Global Investors, called the Kraft Heinz bid a “near-death experience” for the company.

“Unilever is a poster child for the pursuit of long-term, sustainable returns,” he wrote. “3G/Kraft/Heinz is a throwback to the 1980s antics of the late Lords Hanson and White [at Hanson Group].

“Do not succumb to the voices of short-termism. Rally your board, employees and shareholders around your business model and balance sheet. It is not just Unilever at the crossroads: the right or wrong sort of capitalism is at stake.”

Value creation

After Kraft Heinz’s withdrawal, Unilever launched a comprehensive review of  “options to accelerate value creation”. This produced plans to offload the margarine spreads business, review its dual Anglo-Dutch structure, increase its dividend and debt levels, launch a €5bn share buy-back, and arrange its continuing business to enable easier separation of its food operations into a standalone company.

Dekkers described the plans as a “balance” between a conservative approach and a capitalist one based on “huge leverage and cost reduction”.

Polman, meanwhile, drew a different balance between not giving up on a long-term sustainability model that has delivered total shareholder return of 190% under his stewardship, and “satisfying increasingly a group of shareholders who want to see at any time the short-term return.”

Wake-up call

Unilever will progress its post-bid plans, plus the “Connected 4 Growth” cost-cutting strategy that the company quietly unveiled in November, promising to make itself more market-facing and agile.

Unilever does seem to accept, however, that the failed bid was a wake-up call—that it could not continue operating in exactly the same way.

“While we rejected their proposal, we do see it as an inflection point,” chief financial officer Graeme Pitkethly told a New York conference the week after the bid intention was withdrawn.

“In the UK, although you have it written that the board needs to protect the interests of a broad range of stakeholders, it is very much shareholder-oriented.”

–Paul Polman, Unilever

Saying that he was issuing a “mea culpa” over the group’s communications, he added: “Quite simply, we should have done a better job of landing the message.

“The bid substantially undervalued Unilever but the events show us the challenge to unlock more value faster in the shorter term, rather than focusing more heavily on steady value creation over the longer term, which is what we do.

“This has certainly been a trigger moment for Unilever and we will not waste it.”

As the Financial Times commented in April, however, Unilever’s post-bid plan essentially means that “Unilever is 3G-ing itself half-heartedly”.

“Unilever’s management was unfortunate in that Kraft Heinz was easy to discourage,” warned the paper. “The next bidder may not be.”

Takeover protection

Perhaps that’s why Polman is calling on prime minister Theresa May to review Britain’s takeover protection, learning lessons from Kraft’s Cadbury takeover and Pfizer’s failed bid for AstraZeneca.

“In the UK, although you have it written that the board needs to protect the interests of a broad range of stakeholders, it is very much shareholder-oriented,” he complained. “Some other countries have a broader view.”

No prizes for guessing which nation Polman might be referring to most, and the dual-listing review may come up with a solution, leading Unilever to say goodbye to its London stock market listing and headquarters.

“It would be irresponsible to jump to a conclusion without having done the work,” said Polman in April. “But what we have discovered as we drive to unification [is that] we actually have more possibilities to guarantee the future of this company.”

PAUL POLMAN IN QUOTES

“Refugees are often young and bring diversity and skills. Many have qualities related to perseverance, overcoming challenges, hard work and an ability to problem-solve, as well as self-motivation. Not surprisingly, countries that embrace refugees usually have a healthier outlook.” Unilever press release, 20 June 2017

“Our recent review concluded once more that our strategy for long-term value creation through growth and compounding returns on investment is the right one for Unilever and for our shareholders. It also highlighted the opportunity to go faster and further. The progress already made with Connected 4 Growth allows us to now accelerate the programme.” Unilever press release, 6 April 2017

“Actually, that is one of the key issues in the world right now – the lack of global governance in a world that has become far more interdependent. Some countries have played their role historically, but seem to be falling back to their home base; others have not been able to step up to the plate, claiming developing market status. But increasingly the issues that we are facing – climate change, unemployment, social cohesion, food security – these are issues of global proportions. We are often trapped in short-termism … or other things.” The Guardian, 25 January 2016

“I don’t call it courage. I just call it leadership.” On running Unilever, Forbes, 20 July 2015

Andrew Cave is a business journalist who has written for The Telegraph and Forbes.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Ann-marie Murphy joins The Gym Group board
    April 22, 2022
    The Gym Group logo

    Murphy joined the company in April 2018 as director of people and development, and became chief operating officer earlier this year.

  • Companies must put equality at the heart of the race to zero
    November 10, 2021
    Trees reflected in buildings

    Singular pursuit of net-zero by 2050 could exacerbate inequality and derail our chances of a climate-resilient future.

  • The storm before the calm: how boards can make better decisions
    October 18, 2021
    Businessman looking at stormy sky

    Behind every apparently calm surface lies a mass of board member interests, beliefs and emotions. How these conflicts can be managed?

  • 'The most important topic we discuss is the safety of our people'
    March 4, 2022
    Ukraine energy company DTEK logo

    Ukrainian firms are facing huge operational challenges, as well as responsibilities to their employees and the economy of their country.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

3G Capital, AkzoNobel, Kraft, Kraft Heinz, Marijn Dekkers, Paul Polman, PPG industries, Summer 2017, sustainable business, takeover bids, Unilever

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Investors favour votes against directors over say-on-climate proposals
  • Shell overhauls its board
  • ESG grows in importance as driver of M&As
  • What use is governance in a recession?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|