The continuing saga over the future of one-time Renault-Nissan chief executive Carlos Ghosn presents significant questions for running strategic alliances.

Splitting the roles of CEO and chair may help companies prepare for future challenges and avert the risks associated with concentrating power in the hands of one individual.

Since Japan introduced a corporate governance code in 2015, there may be signs that the country is improving its governance—but critics argue that it is a facade that hides the country’s fallibility.

Norway’s $970bn oil investment fund says chair and CEO roles should not be combined but separated. Will it make a difference?

The AMF is told there are concerns about a transfer of powers at Renault-Nissan, and that the role of chief executive Carlos Ghosn may involve conflicts of interest.

Scandals, distrust of big business and a belief that business should be about more than turning a profit are some of the themes underlying the big governance stories in 2016.

Nissan chairman and chief executive consolidates leadership to create three-way alliance.

Francois Hollande may introduce binding shareholder votes on executive pay following Renault boss’s payout.