Skip to content

16 May, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs

      Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • AI will transform

      4 ways AI will transform board dynamics

      Opportunities and challenges are arising from the integration of artificial intelligence into corporate governance.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • meritocracy Fairness makes for meritocracy

      Favouring actions over persuasion, boards can take small yet extremely effective steps to improve diversity,...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

    • EU non-financial reporting reforms are an ‘opportunity’

      Firms can take advantage of the delayed implementation of CSRD and CSDDD to take stock...

  • Career
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board & Governance Services
    • Director Reference Guide: Fostering the board-CEO relationship

      This Board Agenda Director Reference Guide on fostering the board-CEO relationship provides practical advice to...

    • Forvis Mazars AI 2025

      Performance Pulse: Are UK businesses prepared for AI?

      Forvis Mazars measured the AI preparedness of more than 300 UK businesses: 97% say they're...

    • Parker review cover

      Improving the Ethnic Diversity of UK Business, Parker Review update 2025

      The 2025 Parker Review update report, supported by EY. Over the past year, significant progress...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Transparency should be at the heart of executive pay reform

Executive pay levels have caused rows and debate across Europe. The answer for many is increased transparency.

executive pay reform

Image: Shutterstock

Will greater transparency in high executive pay curb boardroom excess? The high pay packages of top executives have been stirring up widespread concern across continental Europe and the UK, triggering measures to introduce new laws, tighten corporate governance codes and shine a light on opaque remuneration schemes.

In the UK, the government published a corporate governance consultation paper in November 2016, to reform spiralling executive pay. The paper comes as public and institutional investor anger grows over the widening pay gap between elite directors and the rest of the workforce.

The reform proposals have gained strong support from institutional investors, employers’ groups and think-tanks, and followed a joint letter from trade unions, governance professionals and company directors to Theresa May, UK prime minister, earlier this year calling for a clamp down on boardroom excess.

Among the top-paid UK bosses in 2015 were Sir Martin Sorrell, who received £70m at advertising agency WPP, and Bob Dudley, BP chief executive, with a pay package of £13.3m.

Executive pay levels in UK companies are running particularly high. A study of 701 listed companies, by Vlerick Business School’s Executive Remuneration Centre, showed that UK chief executives were paid much more than their European peers in Germany, Sweden, The Netherlands, Belgium and France in 2015. Among the top-paid UK bosses in 2015 were Sir Martin Sorrell, who received £70m at advertising agency WPP, and Bob Dudley, BP chief executive, with a pay package of £13.3m.

Xavier Baeten, director of Vlerick’s Brussels-based Executive Remuneration Centre, says: “In continental Europe, pay levels of chief executives have not gone up so much as the UK in the past ten years.”

Boosting transparency on executive pay structures is a substantial part of the green paper proposals. They require chief executives to compare and publish their pay with that of the average worker and to boost disclosure over the variable part of remuneration such as bonuses and complex short and long-term incentive plans that push up pay levels. More frequent binding votes on pay by shareholders are also included.

Pay ratios

Stefan Stern, director at think-tank the High Pay Centre, says: “We have pushed hard on publishing pay ratios, which would be an important part of shaping the discussion on pay and bringing more transparency.” He adds that mandatory publishing of pay ratios “is not too much of a stretch for companies to handle”.

Earlier this year BlackRock, the world’s biggest asset manager, took steps to toughen its approach to executive pay excess. In a letter to FTSE 350 chairmen, signed by Amra Balic, managing director of investment stewardship, the asset manager said that “pay should only be increased each year, if at all, at the same level of the wider employee base, and in line with inflation”. BlackRock says companies that make year-on-year pay rises which are out of line with the rest of the workforce must give a clear reason to support the decision.

“Retail investors, long-term shareholders and asset managers will take notice of pay ratios.”

–Rients Abma, Eumedion

Some European countries have also taken action to strengthen their corporate governance rules. The Netherlands recently revised its code, requiring listed companies to disclose chief executive pay ratios with that of average workers. Companies have to comply with this, or explain in their reporting why they have not done so.

“Retail investors, long-term shareholders and asset managers will take notice of pay ratios,” says Rients Abma, executive director of Eumedion, the Dutch corporate governance and sustainability forum for institutional investors. “When drafting pay policies companies should look at internal pay ratios and benchmarking.”

Abma expects to see increasing pressure from institutional shareholders on companies where the gap between top executives’ pay and the median worker is out of kilter, and more companies being transparent over ratios this year.

The revised Dutch code goes further, requiring chief executives to comment internally on their own pay levels. The comments are then scrutinised by remuneration committees before any top pay schemes are decided.

Making a difference?

But will such measures to boost transparency make a difference to escalating pay levels? Abma believes they do. “We already saw the effects of this. The management board of SBM Offshore [an Amsterdam-listed oil services company] voluntarily proposed a 10% reduction of base pay for a period of 12 months from September 2016, as well as a 50% reduction to any 2016 short-term incentive awards, considering the company’s job cuts,” he says.

Disquiet over high-earning executives in France has triggered new legislation, giving shareholders a binding say on pay and more transparency on the variable part of remuneration packages. Anger came to a head last year when Renault ignored shareholders who voted against the €7.3m pay package of chief executive, Carlos Ghosn, and faced down the anger of the French government, which has a stake in the carmaker.

executive pay reform, Vlerick Business School, remuneration
Source: Vlerick Business School Chief Executive Remuneration Study 2016

“We have made everything on pay more transparent: fixed and variable remuneration, benefits, LTIPs,” says Agnès Touraine, chairwoman of the Institut Français des Administrateurs, the association of directors, which supports the new laws.

However, there can be unintended consequences. Touraine points out that an increase of transparency levels over the past ten years resulted in international remuneration comparisons between top executives, triggering pay inflation. “Transparency for the time being has not brought more moderation on pay—it has inflated pay.”

Germany had a similar experience. The government ushered in legislation in 2005, requiring executive remuneration to be published in annual reports, in a push to increase transparency and to decrease executive board salaries.

“The opposite happened as executives looked at other companies’ executive remuneration, and this pushed up pay,” says Manfred Gentz, outgoing chairman of the German Corporate Governance Code Commission. He favours the best-practice pay disclosure approach outlined in the German corporate governance code, where executive “fixed remuneration, bonuses, short-term and long-term incentives, pensions and even a car or subsidised mortgages, as payments in kind, are clearly laid out in two charts, overseen by the supervisory board.”

Gentz hopes that as the supervisory board “sees all these numbers, they will restrict pay increases to a reasonable level, but do so on a voluntary basis.”

Corporate governance review

In the UK, the Financial Reporting Council also aims to beef up governance. The accounting watchdog plans a review of the UK corporate governance code, which would extend its powers to include company directors and pay issues. Companies would have to explain how targets and remuneration are linked to business performance and how they make pay decisions in relation to dividends and capital investment.

Vlerick’s Xavier Baeten says making high pay levels more transparent is likely to help curb excess, but does not believe governments should intervene. “The job of curbing high pay should be done by shareholders,” he says. He believes the key to change “should take place at board level. They should ask ‘is this a decent level of pay?’ You cannot legislate for this.”

“The job of curbing high pay should be done by shareholders.”

–Xavier Baeten, Vlerick Business School

It is not just senior directors who are under scrutiny on pay. The UK government’s proposals for governance reform also raise the question of whether there should be mandatory disclosure on how fund managers vote at annual general meetings. Publishing the rationale for individual voting decisions could throw more light on pay packages.

Stefan Stern agrees that such a reform would be “a helpful move to greater transparency on pay.”

Others do not support mandatory disclosure of shareholder voting. “We think disclosure is good but most institutional investors in the UK do this,” says George Dallas, policy director at International Corporate Governance Network, an investor-led organisation that promotes governance and investor stewardship. He questions how this would work for international investors outside the UK and believes “it would be better to leave it discretionary.”

Raising the curtain on executive pay packages in the UK also raises the question of whether such a measure would make it more difficult for UK companies to recruit the best international talent for the top jobs. In 2015, 40% of UK bosses at listed companies were foreign, compared with 31% in Sweden and 28% in the Netherlands and Belgium, according to Vlerick Business School research.

Vlerick Business School, remuneration, executive pay reform
Source: Vlerick Business School Chief Executive Remuneration Study 2016

But Stern does not believe this is a problem for the UK. “There is no evidence of flight [over pay disclosure] in the UK or people turning down jobs. I don’t think we should be bluffed about deterrents to do us out of transparency.”

The UK is even less likely to be at a recruitment disadvantage with its European peers at a time when a more level playing field on pay disclosure is underway across European Union member states. The EU recently strengthened its shareholders’ rights directive, giving investors a vote on company pay policy—at least every four years—and increasing transparency on the link between directors’ pay and company performance, providing a bigger picture for the basis of pay deals.

As the annual general meeting season warms up this year, shareholders are in fighting mood over pay excess. At Thomas Cook, the FTSE 250 travel company, one-third of investors voted against the chief executive’s bonus plan, which led to a reduction of the payout in February. Other companies are carefully scanning their remuneration proposals ahead of their AGMs.

In such an environment, widespread measures to improve pay transparency could be the right spur to curb boardroom excess. It will certainly give shareholders more muscle to hold boards of big companies to account for out-of-control compensation.

“Now it is up to the shareholders to vote with their feet if they do not see enough transparency on pay,” says Ms Touraine.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Search


Follow Us

Boardroom Intelligence

Stay in the know and register for free to receive our essential Boardroom Intelligence Briefing featuring:

  • Top governance headlines, expert opinion & boardroom insights, exclusive whitepapers & strategy guides, delivered to your inbox every week – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

By registering you will be able to access one premium article each month, selected partner newsletters and content, plus updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board & Governance Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap