Skip to content

18 May, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • venture capital startup

      How venture capital boosts good governance

      It’s not merely financial support: venture capital expertise can put an early-stage business in the...

      AIM diversity

      AIM’s failure to act on diversity threatens governance

      The alternative investment market is not keeping pace on gender diversity, to the detriment of...

      future ready

      Why the best boards invest in multiple futures

      In an unpredictable world, the best boards fund multiple pathways and move as fast as...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • early warning

      Are you ignoring a crucial early warning system?

      When organisations choose to silence those who question corporate actions, it is bad for society—and...

      venture capital startup

      How venture capital boosts good governance

      It’s not merely financial support: venture capital expertise can put an early-stage business in the...

      AIM diversity

      AIM’s failure to act on diversity threatens governance

      The alternative investment market is not keeping pace on gender diversity, to the detriment of...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

      stewarding AI

      AI is a ‘special case for governance’

      As AI use in the boardroom grows, it’s essential to focus on the ethical and...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • AIM diversity

      AIM’s failure to act on diversity threatens governance

      The alternative investment market is not keeping pace on gender diversity, to the detriment of...

      UK and US CEO

      Corporate shift toward experienced CEOs

      Leadership succession shows fewer first-time chief executives, especially in the US, according to turnover figures.

      female CEO

      Number of women in leadership stays unchanged

      In 2021, there were only eight female CEOs in the FTSE 100—a figure that is...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • board's role in a rewired world fgs 2026 cover

      A hard job getting harder: The board’s role in a rewired world

      The role of director is demanding intellectually, ethically and strategically. FGS interviewed 175 experts and...

      Internal Control Failure!

      This Chartered IIA report analyses FCA enforcement action and examines cases where weaknesses in internal...

      European Corporate Governance Barometer 2026

      EcoDa's report highlights emerging governance challenges for European boards, such as technology, cyber risk and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Support grows for retaining core sustainability reporting

by Gavin Hinks on September 9, 2025

A letter signed by 475 companies and investors sets out measures to achieve ‘the EU’s economic and sustainability goals’.

sustainability

Image: chayanuphol/Shutterstock.com

Favorite

Hundreds of companies and investors—among them names such as H&M Group, Nokia and Allianz—have signed a letter calling on the European Union to retain the core elements of sustainability reporting currently under review as part of a drive for improved EU competitiveness.

In all, there are 475 signatories to the letter, which details measures they claim will maintain the EU’s sustainable finance framework.

Among them is a call to apply new rules in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to companies with 500 employees or more, rather than the 1,000—or even 3,000 worker—threshold proposed in some quarters.

The letter says: “Rules on sustainability reporting, transition plans, climate targets and corporate due diligence are a key foundation for achieving the EU’s economic and sustainability goals.”

It adds that rules such as the CSRD and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) are “essential for achieving the EU’s wider sustainability growth and competitiveness ambitions”.

The rules were placed under review in February, following a report from former European Central Bank chair Mario Draghi in which he said: “The EU’s sustainability reporting and due diligence framework is a major source of regulatory burden magnified by a lack of guidance to facilitate the application of complex rules and to clarify the interaction between various pieces of legislation.”

Who’s covered?

One issue has been the scope of the new rules, or which companies they apply to. The new letter calls for it to cover companies with 500 employees, much broader than the 3,000 proposed by Jörgen Warborn, European Parliament rapporteur, a threshold that would drastically reduce the number of companies caught by the new rules.

The most recent movement from the commission has been the publication of newly revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), the reporting rules at the heart of the CSRD.

The body that oversees development of ESRS has proposed an overall 69% reduction in mandatory and voluntary data points to be reported.

Double materiality

The body also wants to “streamline” the double materiality assessment companies must undertake.

In the recent letter, the companies, investors and campaign groups call for an ESRS simplification that “maintains the double materiality approach” of the earlier CSRD; ensures the scope of CSRD is for companies of 500 employees; and ensures the CSDDD remains in line with UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and OECD guidelines.

Current proposals for CSDDD have been criticised for diverging from UNGP. The International Federation for Human Rights has argued the proposals go too far in “stripping the CSDDD of its practical utility.”

The omnibus has a little way to go, though European officials are on an accelerated timetable, hoping to finalise changes by the end of 2025. That means there are many voices attempting to grab headlines and sway opinion among decision makers. The final rules are unlikely to please everyone.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • UN weighs in on EU human rights due diligence debate
    February 17, 2025
    human rights due diligence

    UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights calls on EU "not to reopen" controversial measures in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.

  • Call to restrict sustainability reporting to EU firms with 3,000+ staff
    June 17, 2025
    EU rapporteur Jörgen Warborn

    European Parliament rapporteur Jörgen Warborn proposes changes for ‘less red tape and fewer burdens for businesses’.

  • France calls for a halt on EU sustainability disclosure laws
    January 27, 2025
    France CSDDD

    The French government seeks ‘indefinite postponement’ of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.

  • New EU laws will make boardrooms more 'accountable'
    April 19, 2023
    EU board accountability

    Proxy adviser ISS says recent directives will grant shareholders much greater influence when voting at this year’s European AGMs.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 - UK insights

Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy