Skip to content

7 September, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • climate risk

      Now is the time to take action on climate risk

      Whatever direction national policies take, nature and climate remain as drivers of value and risk...

      AI risk

      AI is about strategy, not technology

      Clients are judging how professional services firms are performing against their AI expectations, but most...

      organisational capability

      5 ways to assess organisational capability

      Strong strategy is not enough—boards also need to know whether the organisation has the people,...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • climate risk

      Now is the time to take action on climate risk

      Whatever direction national policies take, nature and climate remain as drivers of value and risk...

      ai skills gap

      Don’t forget to price up the AI skills gap 

      With AI set to be biggest force reshaping organisations, it is time to put workforce...

      qualities

      Audit quality: from progress to consistency

      Can the audit profession capitalise on its improvements to meet its next challenge—embedding quality across...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • governance

      How better governance helps private companies grow

      If governance is to become mature, management decision-making has no place on the board’s agenda,...

      future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • board skills clash

      When board skills clash

      Board composition in terms of expertise has a clear impact on entrepreneurial decision-making and strategy,...

      female ceos

      FTSE 100 CEO appointments rise

      The number of CEO appointments has doubled in six months, although the global picture suggests...

      board role

      How to engage with outreach

      When board opportunities knock, should you answer the door? Here are tips from a new...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • Georgeson 2026 European AGM Season Review

      Georgeson’s deep dive into the evolving dynamics of investor voting across nine major European markets in...

      2026 MidYear Executive Benchmark Survey: The Verification Gap

      AI enthusiasm is running into reality: 1 in 4 executives in this Workiva survey say...

      Seven Steps for Futureproofing Business

      This guide from Business in the Community aims to help businesses build a practical strategy...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

France and Germany call for ‘1 for 1’ on new sustainability reporting rules

by Gavin Hinks on September 1, 2025

The EU’s two biggest states aim for more streamlining of sustainability reporting framework as EU consultation continues.

EU sustainability

Image: Christophe Licoppe/Shutterstock.com

Favorite

Germany and France have called for a “1 in 1 out” approach to corporate sustainability reporting rules as a further measure in the “omnibus” process currently underway to simplify disclosures for companies operating in the EU.

The call follows a meeting of ministers from the two leading states at the end of August and faces criticism that it strikes a tone suggesting sustainability reporting is a “competitive disadvantage”.

A statement following the summit says French and German leaders want to see the omnibus process accelerated and “restraint” on new reporting rules.

“In addition to ambitiously reducing existing reporting obligations,” the statement says, “limit new obligations by introducing a ‘1 for 1’ rule on information transmissions obligations based on the principle that any new obligation to declare, report or transmit information at European level should accompanied by an equivalent cost reduction.”

The meeting of ministers was not part of the formal omnibus process but will lever extra pressure on EU officials currently trying to ease the regulatory burden of sustainability reporting rules on companies .

The statement met with some criticism. Andreas Rasche, a business professor at Copenhagen Business School, posted on LinkedIn: “The direction is clear: both [Germany and France] will push heavily for further sustainability ‘simplifications’ (eg through the new environment omnibus that is planned for the Fall).

“But, declaring sustainability regulations a competitive disadvantage may appease populist and revisionist sentiments. But it is not a winning strategy for Europe’s future.”

The omnibus process, launched in February, followed a report on European competitiveness from Mario Draghi, former European Central Bank president, which said the EU’s framework for sustainability reporting amounted to a problem.

“The EU’s sustainability reporting and due diligence framework is a major source of regulatory burden magnified by a lack of guidance to facilitate the application of complex rules and to clarify the interaction between various pieces of legislation.”

Part of the omnibus process was to review the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) developed for inclusion in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).

At the end of July a new set of standards were issued for consultation reducing the number of data points required in reports by around two thirds.

EFRAG, the body developing the revised ESRS, said it had cut mandatory datapoints by 57% and, with a cut in voluntary datapoints, the overall reduction in disclosed content would be 68%.

“Following extensive feedback from companies already reporting under CSRD, as well s those those preparing to do so, EFRAG focused on cutting complexity and improving usability,” a statement said.

Datapoints are not the only adjustment. EFRAG also wants to “streamline” the double materiality assessment included in ESRS, making it easier for companies to assess their impact on key societal factors like the environment and people.

The omnibus also includes other major proposals including a reduced scope for CSRD. Initially it was planned to apply to companies with 250 employees, but proposals are focused on companies with 1,000 workers. European Parliament figures have argued the threshold should be as much 3,000.

Consultation on ESRS runs until 29 September. While the EU is anxious to deliver a streamlined reporting framework by the end of the year, there is much still to settle. The question is whether the process will deliver reduced regulation while delivering on the EU’s green agenda.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Omnibus reform process for non-financial reporting struck by competing demands
    May 27, 2025
    omnibus CSDDD

    The European Commission is working on reforms to CSRD and CSDDD but is faced with diverging demands from diverse interest groups.

  • EU sustainability reporting reforms trigger backlash from NGO coalition
    April 22, 2025
    EU, European Union, European Commission

    Sustainability cited as the biggest loser in the EU’s omnibus process, with claims process is "undemocratic" and "untransparent"

  • EU faces calls to retain 'double materiality'
    August 5, 2025
    reporting challenges

    Organisations argue the EU must hold on to principle that mandates companies to report on the impact of climate on their business models and the effect of their activities on society and the environment.

  • Listed companies switch jurisdictions to ‘get better valuations’
    November 11, 2024
    switch jurisdictions

    Moving stocks is on the rise, but rarely because of a company’s financial performance, research into activist investors reveals.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

The Future of FTSE 350 Chairs: Pathways, Pipelines & Barriers 2026

This report is a collaboration between the FTSE Women Leaders Review and Professor...

Agentic AI from principles to practice 

‘A C-suite guide to capturing value without losing control’, this Forvis Mazars...

Route to the Top: Europe 2026 

This survey report from Heidrick & Struggles finds that companies are tending...
board's role in a rewired world fgs 2026 cover

A hard job getting harder: The board's role in a rewired world

The role of a corporate director is demanding intellectually, ethically and strategically—and...

Boardroom resilience: Practical governance for risk, readiness and rapid response

Boards are operating in a world defined by uncertainty. Geopolitical tensions, climate...

Board Value Index Summer 2026

Board Intelligence found 86% of directors say rigid processes and inconsistent frameworks...

Governance Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Governance Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy