Skip to content

9 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Now is the time to consider the UK Corporate Governance Code

by Richard Sheath

Boards can find positivity—rather than pain—if they approach the coming requirements with vigour and rigour.

UK Corporate Governance Code

Image: Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock.com

It’s striking how little we are hearing about the revised UK Corporate Governance Code, or seeing audit committees react. Maybe it’s because the changes seemed quite tame, once the politics had led to a severely pruned rework. Or maybe it’s because a lot of the changes don’t kick in until 2026. Or perhaps it comes down to companies concluding that it’s all just about reporting.

If changes are needed, leaving it longer could end in an unhelpful rush at the 2026 reporting year deadline.

Whatever the cause, boards need to come to a clear position once 2025 gets under way. If changes are needed, leaving it longer could end in an unhelpful rush at the 2026 reporting year deadline. That might mean a lost opportunity to get business value from the changes as time pressure leads to a minimalist, compliance-driven solution. So audit and risk committees need to decide: does this require much change for us (and, if so, what?) or can we rely on what we already do and just tweak the reporting?

It’s not straightforward. There is always the option to comply in form but not substance, simply looking to report that bit more—but that entails some risk. Making public statements in the annual report may not feel quite as demanding as reporting to a regulator but, if something goes wrong, it would be unsurprising if some start delving into the detail of directors’ statements in the annual report.

Minimal compliance is also rather a blinkered approach. Code-driven changes in reporting are often a good opportunity to stand back and check that you are doing things as well as you think. Reporting and compliance requirements can often drive better behaviours that bring benefits to the business, and not just to the auditors and lawyers.

Areas of focus

Let’s just recap briefly on the main changes, setting out what stands to be gained by not missing these opportunities.

First up, the change requires boards to explain how they have assessed the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control framework, not just confirming that they have. Vague or boilerplate explanations could end up looking unconvincing. Too often we see committees that equate effectiveness with having recognisable ERM structures and processes, without also considering whether the risk management framework is having the intended impact. Sometimes they overlook things such as the risk culture, learning from risks that have crystallised, or the need to frame how things are working in the context of strategic development.

Next is the new requirement for the board to make a declaration on the effectiveness of material controls, along with an explanation of how weaknesses will be tackled (or have been already). Making a declaration is different from merely reporting on how the control framework works. The risks for the board and management are different—especially when you’re explaining how a previously identified weakness has been successfully addressed.

There is a raft of questions around how much documentation is needed and what processes need to be established: making a declaration on the effectiveness at balance sheet date will have to depend on effectiveness assessment during the course of the year. Most audit and risk committees will already be doing a lot around this, but structuring it to support certification may mean augmenting it to a level we don’t always see except, to a degree, in SOX compliance cases.

What’s needed will depend partly what you define as “material”: there is no specific guidance and each board will have to decide.

There is also the approach to identifying and managing emerging risks. This will have to be described. Often, this is quite vague. What’s “emerging” is unclear: how far out do you go before it’s unrealistic or nonsensical to try to assess the scale of the risk, never mind formulate a response?

We often see boards having interesting discussions around emerging risks at the strategic level, but rarely pinning down the response.

We often see boards having interesting discussions around emerging risks at the strategic level, typically on their away day, but rarely does that go on to the next step of pinning down the response. Maybe it just needs to be a high level description of how you scan horizons and begin developing the mitigation. But, with emerging risks being so varied in nature and immediacy, a general catch-all description might come over as bland and evasive.

The key to getting this right will be adopting the appropriate mindset. If you merely approach it from a compliance and reporting viewpoint, then the outcome will be process-driven reporting that convinces neither stakeholders nor the board itself.

Consider how this new requirement can actually help the business and the value should become evident. Won’t most businesses benefit from a rigorous approach to checking that risk management is having the expected impact? That material controls are, in fact, in good shape? And that emerging risks are being anticipated, and prepared for?

It can be hard to embrace new regulatory demands, especially when they appear to be just adding more and more to the annual report. Draw out the business benefits, however, and it should at least become positive rather than painful.

Richard Sheath is a director of board evaluation consultancy Independent Audit Limited

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Governance code reforms will ramp up internal controls
    July 12, 2022
    Patisserie Valerie

    Watchdog ‘lays groundwork for the creation of ARGA’ with planned consultation on audit committee ‘minimum standards’.

  • The UK needs an audit and corporate governance reform bill
    July 16, 2024
    audit reform

    Adopting proposals ditched by the previous government would foster growth and a transparent, trustworthy business ecosystem.

  • Audit committees name ESG reporting as top agenda item
    February 14, 2023
    Audit ESG reporting

    US audit committees are focused on sustainability reporting despite ESG becoming a point of friction in US politics.

  • Years after Carillion’s collapse, the UK still waits for audit reform
    October 31, 2022
    minister

    Researchers say inquiry focused on apportioning blame to individuals, rather than investigating the regulatory system.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap