Skip to content

8 February, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • growth in a volatile year

      5 strategies for growth in a volatile year

      A survey of the C-suite in Europe reveals the practical and pragmatic approaches being taken...

      AI governance

      6 steps to protect leaders in the era of AI

      Organisational trust and board members’ reputations increasingly need safeguarding in a digital, algorithm-driven world.

      audit reform

      This is the worst time to abandon audit reform

      High-quality audit, accurate corporate reporting and strong governance give investors confidence and help companies operate...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • growth in a volatile year

      5 strategies for growth in a volatile year

      A survey of the C-suite in Europe reveals the practical and pragmatic approaches being taken...

      audit reform

      This is the worst time to abandon audit reform

      High-quality audit, accurate corporate reporting and strong governance give investors confidence and help companies operate...

      ai truth

      Is AI telling you the truth?

      In an age of flattering machines that encourage complacency, we need ‘collisions with error’ for...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • 2026 OUTLOOK

      Are you ready for 2026?

      Buckle up: it looks like boards are in for a turbulent time. We interviewed key...

      sustainability report audit

      Thinking of sidelining sustainability? Think again

      Boards that embed sustainability into strategy will be ready to face today’s complex environment, the...

      global commerce

      Is global commerce about to be reshaped?

      As the US Supreme Court gets set to rule on the legality of tariffs, experts...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • female CEO

      Number of women in leadership stays unchanged

      In 2021, there were only eight female CEOs in the FTSE 100—a figure that is...

      female NED

      UK female non-executives earn £73k less than male NEDs

      Although the UK’s average gender pay gap on boards is shrinking, it is still one...

      directors duties

      3 top tips on directors’ duties

      When directors fall short of their responsibilities, the consequences can be devastating. How can board...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • forvis mazars ceo 2026

      C-suite barometer: outlook 2026

      Forvis Mazars collected the views of more than 3,000 C-suite executives across 40 countries, for...

      PwC Global CEO 2026 survey cover

      PwC 29th Global CEO Survey 2026

      PwC’s 29th Global CEO Survey is based on responses from 4,454 chief executives across 95...

      WEF global risks 2026 cover

      The Global Risks Report 2026

      The World Economic Forum surveyed more than 1,300 global leaders and experts, to explore global...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Proxy voting trends to watch in 2025

by Demi Derem on November 27, 2024

For AGMs in 2025 ESG will remain important; ‘pass-through’ voting will make its mark; retail investors are coming; enhanced engagement from issuers and GenAI is a ‘game changer’.

Group of raised hands on green background

Image: Arosoft/Shutterstock

Favorite

Investor engagement reached new heights in 2024 as individual shareholders took an active stance. In the US, for example, according to Broadridge’s ProxyPulseTM report, individual investors owned 31.7% of shares held beneficially in street name, and their voting participation increased to 29.8%, the highest in nine years. We also saw retail investors were more supportive of board recommendations, in comparison to institutional investors. Notably in the US, corporate director proposals and say-on-pay support rose, with approval rates reaching 91% and 88%, respectively.

While institutional investors are continuing to push for greater transparency, those serving the retail segment are needing to expand their market coverage and offer a far more retail-focused voting user experience.

As we look toward 2025, several significant trends are shaping the proxy voting landscape, and it is becoming increasing clear that the needs of institutional and retail investors are far from identical. While institutional investors are continuing to push for greater transparency, those serving the retail segment are needing to expand their market coverage and offer a far more retail-focused voting user experience, that allows quick and easy digestion of key information that they care about.

This year, institutional asset managers began offering pass-through voting options (allowing investors a say in how their assets are voted) to their investors, and this trend is likely to persist as asset owners continue to demand oversight and greater stewardship influence. We have also seen the use of AI starting to have an influence on provider offerings to both issuers and investors. Here the focus has been on predicting behaviours, engagement and extrapolating outcomes.

There are five five major trends expected to shape proxy voting in the coming year.

ESG focus will remain–but for different reasons

ESG will retain a high profile within the sphere of proxy voting, but its impact will not be uniform across segments. Institutional investors and asset owners are not necessarily expected to have a growing overall focus on ESG in its entirety. However, they will continue to dial up their interest and commitment in the core area of governance as they strive to increase demonstrable transparency and efficiency throughout the vote processing lifecycle, and optimise the overall standard of stewardship—in the knowledge that such best practices will ultimately lead to stronger leadership and higher shareholder returns.

Turning to the retail investor, and those who serve them, all ESG elements will remain important—but noting that there will be instances when “E” and “S” specific events and themes will trigger a disproportionately strong reaction that will need to be duly supported by scalable services matching the needs of the individual investors.

Voting on funds: aka “pass-through voting”

One of the top trends to watch is the rise of pass-through voting, the practice of giving investors a voice in how their asset managers vote the proxies on the underlying equities that make up the fund in which they have a position. Because the asset manager is the legal owner of the securities in each fund, fund investors do not have the right to vote on the underlying issuer meetings. However, new innovations are now making it possible to give fund investors a greater voice in the proxy process.

New innovations are now making it possible to give fund investors a greater voice in the proxy process.

In 2025, this trend is likely to continue as large asset managers strive to offer more pass-through voting options, giving fund shareholders additional transparency and control – even for the more complex fund structures such as fund of funds. To support this, asset owner platform solutions are likely to continue to evolve to provide the capturing and communication of stewardship preferences, combined with elements of research and data analysis.

The growing influence of retail investors

In 2025, retail investors in Europe are likely to become an even bigger driving force, creating an increased demand for platforms that can cater to their needs. Regulations such as the EU Shareholder Rights Directive (SRDII) opened up EU markets to them, mandating equities share dealing intermediaries to offer voting services that cater to their needs. However, those intermediaries that opted for minimum compliance (for example, excluding a voting service for US equities), will need to move quickly to meet retail investor expectations. High profile meetings such as Tesla in the summer of 2024 raised awareness across the EU retail investor community and a gap was exposed that remains for many today.

Those that have reviewed retail investor participation since SRD II have noted also that, unlike institutional investors, retail investors typically want to vote when there is an issue that they really care about. The frequency of their voting may be once a year or multiple times based on themes that they hold dear. It is also becoming increasing clear that retail participation in voting is directly linked to the user experience. The less user friendly and intuitive, the less voting participation is observed.

Enhanced engagement from issuers

For retail shareholders, digital engagement tools and platforms are expected to play a key role in effective communication.

Transparency and proactive engagement with shareholders—both institutional and retail—are growing priorities for issuers as they work to meet investors’ expectations and foster trust. The ultimate objective is attracting long-term ownership in their stock. Companies are increasingly interested in understanding shareholder perspectives on governance, social responsibility and performance. Disclosure tools and services became increasingly available in response to SRDII in Europe, enabling shareholder identification, and looking ahead open communication channels between issuers and investors, supported by technology, will become essential to meet these expectations.

For retail shareholders, digital engagement tools and platforms are expected to play a key role in effective communication. With the increased accessibility of these tools and the ability to engage with individual investors on the investors’ terms, issuers can more easily identify exactly who their underlying shareholders are, better understand their preferences, and use this information to develop more informed engagement strategies.

And, of course, AI is a game changer

AI-powered tools will play a larger role in helping issuers understand what matters most to investors.

Generative AI is revolutionising proxy voting by analysing large datasets to deliver insights into shareholder behaviour and preferences. By using predictive analytics, investor relations teams can identify patterns and segment investors, creating more targeted engagement strategies. AI-powered tools will play a larger role in helping issuers understand what matters most to investors, including insights on ESG priorities, and can anticipate voting trends that enable issuers to communicate effectively with both retail and institutional shareholders.

There are, of course, many areas of investor services that are introducing new AI use cases that will have an impact on governance and proxy voting, either directly or indirectly. Witness the continued emergence of digital brokers offering trading solutions to underlying investors and looking to AI to help drive portfolio selection and management options. Another example is the impact that AI is already having on operational process efficiency, potentially paving the way for future pricing competitiveness and investment growth.

Looking ahead

2025 promises to bring increased levels of transparency and efficiency, accessible digital platforms, and a continued stream of innovation across the proxy voting landscape. As retail investors gain more influence, it is vital that their service providers are ready to support their specific needs, not only in terms of their underlying access to ease-of-use voting tools but also to the growing desire of Europe-based individual investors to exercise their stewardship entitlements in the US. Voting on funds and collective investment vehicles also represents a step change in governance opportunities, and an area in which I anticipate further growth. These continued advancements of corporate governance through proxy voting should, in turn, continue to help drive improved shareholder returns.

Demi Derem, SVP of International Investor Communication Solutions at Broadridge.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Regulator to review impact of ESG ratings on firms
    July 11, 2022
    impact of ESG ratings

    The FRC has commissioned a review to investigate how ESG ratings agencies and proxy advisers affect investment decisions.

  • BlackRock expands voting choice in response to investor demand
    June 14, 2022
    BlackRock offices in San Francisco

    Voting will now be available to clients representing 47% of index equity assets globally, including 650 funds based in the US and UK.

  • ISS announces 2023 updates to proxy voting guidelines
    December 1, 2022
    ISS proxy guidance

    The ISS policy updates, applicable to shareholder meetings on or after 1 February, increase focus on executive pay and board accountability.

  • ISS strikes back at ESG critics
    June 15, 2023
    ISS ESG

    The global proxy advisory firm takes to task politicians who would block the use of ESG factors when making investment decisions.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 - UK insights

Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy